Author Archives: Hall

Law.com/NYLJ: COVID-19 and the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights Is Being Tested by the Coronavirus

Law.com/NYLJ: COVID-19 and the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights Is Being Tested by the Coronavirus by John Curran, Jake Gardener and Jeffery Ding (“The coronavirus is set to test our Bill of Rights more broadly than any other event … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Law.com/NYLJ: COVID-19 and the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights Is Being Tested by the Coronavirus

E.D.Ark.: “After editing out the incomplete and false portions of the warrant affidavit, the remaining information was insufficient to establish” PC

“After editing out the incomplete and false portions of the warrant affidavit, the remaining information was insufficient to establish that Green was dead and that his death was caused by the criminal act of another person. Accordingly, the Court finds … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: “After editing out the incomplete and false portions of the warrant affidavit, the remaining information was insufficient to establish” PC

D.Nev.: Six days to draft a cell phone SW was reasonable

The government was diligent in getting a warrant over six days, including a weekend, where the agents and the USAO spent most of three days drafting it. “Still, the Fourth Amendment obligated the United States to ‘diligently obtain[ ] a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Six days to draft a cell phone SW was reasonable

CA9: Bringing police with criminal investigative motive to execute admin. warrant was unreasonable

An administrative inspection warrant is based on a programmatic probable cause standard, and not probable cause to believe that a crime occurred. Using the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office to help do a City of Lancaster administrative entry and search … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA9: Bringing police with criminal investigative motive to execute admin. warrant was unreasonable

CA8: Police shooting of man with gun who hadn’t pointed it without warning was unreasonable

The use of deadly force here wasn’t reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. The shooting victim had a gun in hand but he hadn’t threatened the officer with it. The failure to give a warning warn “exacerbate[s] the circumstances” and supports … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8: Police shooting of man with gun who hadn’t pointed it without warning was unreasonable

TN: With no findings of fact, court can look at dashcam video and draw own conclusion suppression was appropriate

The trial court didn’t make findings of fact, so the appellate court can review the dashcam video and draw its own conclusions. “The trial court reviewed the testimony of the only witness and made an implicit finding that his testimony … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Standards of review | Comments Off on TN: With no findings of fact, court can look at dashcam video and draw own conclusion suppression was appropriate

OH5: Trial court’s finding of officer’s credibility where dashcam didn’t help was binding on appeal

The dashcam video was inconclusive on whether defendant stopped, but the trial court credited the officer, and that’s binding on the court of appeals. State v. Blasingame, 2020-Ohio-3087, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2029 (5th Dist. May 21, 2020).* Two dashcam … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH5: Trial court’s finding of officer’s credibility where dashcam didn’t help was binding on appeal

M.D.Tenn.: Failure to corroborate everything, even the easy to corroborate, isn’t reckless under Franks

Defendant did not make a substantial preliminary showing that there was a reckless material statement in support of the search warrant. Moreover, “Defendant provides no authority to support his position that an officer’s failure to corroborate a fact that ‘could … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Failure to corroborate everything, even the easy to corroborate, isn’t reckless under Franks

E.D.Ky.: It was reasonable for officers to open a car door when the driver was parked and unresponsive

Defendant’s car was parked on a Waffle House parking lot from 2-5 am with the headlights on, and it was reasonable for officers to check on the car. Inside was defendant who didn’t respond to them, and it was reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: It was reasonable for officers to open a car door when the driver was parked and unresponsive

D.Me.: Order of protection between occupants of car is RS

When the officer discovers an order of protection between two people in a car, there is reasonable suspicion to investigate further. United States v. Williams, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91549 (D. Me. May 26, 2020). The police reasonably believed the … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Me.: Order of protection between occupants of car is RS

NYT: House to Vote on Limiting FBI Power to Collect Americans’ Internet Data NYTimes: House to Vote on Limiting F.B.I. Power to Collect Americans’ Internet Data by Charlie Savage (“Lawmakers compromised on an ambiguously worded amendment that narrows a failed … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, FISA, National security | Comments Off on

FL1: Retaining lawfully obtained DNA in CODIS isn’t a separate search subject to 4A

“The retention of a lawfully obtained DNA record on CODIS for future use does not constitute a separate search or implicate the Fourth Amendment.” Porter v. State, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 7218 (Fla. 1st DCA May 26, 2020). Defendant was … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on FL1: Retaining lawfully obtained DNA in CODIS isn’t a separate search subject to 4A

CA11: Seeing handrolled joint in hand in high crime area was RS

“As Officer Erik Cabrales of the Ocala Police Department and Officer Rodriguez patrolled an apartment complex known for violence and drug sales, they observed Fredericks sitting outside holding a cigarette that had been hand-rolled in brown paper. Cabrales noticed Fredericks … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Seeing handrolled joint in hand in high crime area was RS

D.N.J.: How this case determined credibility of the witnesses

“The Court credits Officer Pompeo’s testimony because he offered a version of events that is not only plausible but also aligns with the respective motivations of law enforcement and Ms. Rodriguez, in light of other, undisputed facts surrounding the events … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.J.: How this case determined credibility of the witnesses

E.D.Wis.: Open container in car justified search

An open container violation is an offense justifying a search of a vehicle for more. United States v. Hoskins, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90256 (E.D. Wis. May 22, 2020).* The stop reached the level of reasonable suspicion before dispatch responded, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Open container in car justified search

techdirt: On The Same Day The FBI Claimed No Vendor Could Crack IPhones, Another Way To Crack IPhones Made The News

techdirt: On The Same Day The FBI Claimed No Vendor Could Crack IPhones, Another Way To Crack IPhones Made The News by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on techdirt: On The Same Day The FBI Claimed No Vendor Could Crack IPhones, Another Way To Crack IPhones Made The News

OH6: State didn’t show unequivocal consent on dashcam video

Defendant’s maybe nodding her head yes was contrary to her words on the dashcam video. There was no unequivocal voluntary consent. State v. Casi, 2020-Ohio-3063, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2010 (6th Dist. May 22, 2020). “Although the video of Vaclavik’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on OH6: State didn’t show unequivocal consent on dashcam video

AZ: Cell phones are “property” subject to probation searches

“Cell phones provide access to an immense array of private information, much of which is stored in the Cloud or on sites controlled by third parties. As such, the United States Supreme Court concluded in Riley v. California that people … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on AZ: Cell phones are “property” subject to probation searches

EFF: COVID-19 Patients’ Right to Privacy Against Quarantine Surveillance

EFF: COVID-19 Patients’ Right to Privacy Against Quarantine Surveillance by Adam Schwartz (“Governments around the world are using surveillance technologies to monitor whether COVID-19 patients are complying with instructions to quarantine at home. These include GPS ankle shackles, phone apps … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: COVID-19 Patients’ Right to Privacy Against Quarantine Surveillance

TX13: Affidavit for SW shouldn’t have been admitted at trial, but it was harmless error as cumulative

The state conceded error that the affidavit for defendant’s blood search warrant should not have been admitted into evidence at trial. (Defendant objected to a paragraph of hearsay.) It was, however, harmless error and merely cumulative to what the officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on TX13: Affidavit for SW shouldn’t have been admitted at trial, but it was harmless error as cumulative