Author Archives: Hall

S.D.Ohio: Nexus was lacking for def’s cell phone for evidence of rape, but GFE applies

“Unlike the officers in Hodson and Neuhard, however, the officers in this case were not seeking evidence of child pornography. Instead, the Detective’s affidavit sought evidence related to ‘Rape 2907.02, Gross Sexual Imposition 2907.05.’ … A commonsense review of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Nexus was lacking for def’s cell phone for evidence of rape, but GFE applies

CA11: Anonymous 911 call with eyewitness details was RS

“Bruce insists that the officers had no reason at all to find the anonymous tip reliable, but that’s just not so. For purposes of a brief investigatory detention like the one we consider here, an anonymous 911 call giving eyewitness … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Anonymous 911 call with eyewitness details was RS

CA6: No REP in talking to a friend who was recording it

No matter how much one trusts a friend, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy that the friend won’t have recorded it and revealed it (Hoffa and White). Courser v. Mich. House of Representatives, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 31917 (6th … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: No REP in talking to a friend who was recording it

TX6: SW affidavit not admissible at trial

Defendant was prejudiced by admission of the search warrant and affidavit for it over defense objection. When defendant testified he was asked about all his porn, adult and apparent less than adult. [Why did he testify knowing that was coming?] … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX6: SW affidavit not admissible at trial

CA6: QI for workplace search of cell phone

Plaintiff is a police officer who sued over the workplace search of his cell phone (see City of Ontario v. Quon) after his wife grabbed it and turned it in claiming he was having sex with another officer. Qualified immunity … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: QI for workplace search of cell phone

CA4: Potentially glaring Franks claim proved immaterial

Defendant’s Franks claim was based on the fact that one Blount lived at the place to be searched, and Blount was associated with 7 addresses. Blount, however, had been in prison and couldn’t have lived there for a while. Nevertheless, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA4: Potentially glaring Franks claim proved immaterial

S.D.Miss.: Def was seized when his car was blocked by a police car and officer approached; there was no RS

Defendant’s car was practically blocked in a parking lot by a police car, and the officer got out and approached him. A reasonable person would not feel free to leave, and he was seized without reasonable suspicion. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Def was seized when his car was blocked by a police car and officer approached; there was no RS

CA4: Seizure of firearm was inevitable; def would have been arrested for DUI and searched incident to arrest anyway

“[W]e conclude that the district court did not err in crediting the arresting officer’s testimony and finding that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest Herman for driving under the influence. We further conclude that the district court did … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Search incident | Comments Off on CA4: Seizure of firearm was inevitable; def would have been arrested for DUI and searched incident to arrest anyway

CA5: Dist.Ct. erred in dismissing civil claim ptf never saw 32 pg attachment to SW

One of plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims was that the 32 page attachment limiting the scope of the search warrant was not attached, and he still hadn’t seen it. The district court erred in dismissing the claim without the plaintiff seeing … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA5: Dist.Ct. erred in dismissing civil claim ptf never saw 32 pg attachment to SW

CNET: Google is giving data to police based on search keywords, court docs show

CNET: Google is giving data to police based on search keywords, court docs show by Alfred Ng (“Court records in an arson case show that Google gave away data on people who searched for a specific address.”)

Posted in Digital privacy, Informational privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CNET: Google is giving data to police based on search keywords, court docs show

CA6: Def consented to expanding breadth of SW because it was in his interest

Police had a search warrant for defendant’s property with marijuana grow operation, but the warrant didn’t cover outbuildings [usually they don’t even have to to cover them]. Here, defendant consented to the breadth of the search, and it was voluntary … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA6: Def consented to expanding breadth of SW because it was in his interest

Oregon Fed.Def.: Developments in Federal Search and Seizure Law (Oct. 2020 update)

fd.org: Developments in Federal Search and Seizure Law (Oct. 2020 update) This shows defense wins, so those from the prosecution side need to be aware. (I’ll look for a usable link that doesn’t require regular updating here.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Oregon Fed.Def.: Developments in Federal Search and Seizure Law (Oct. 2020 update)

D.S.C.: Renter of hotel room had authority to consent to search of room but not her partner’s safe he brought to room

The renter of a hotel room has apparent authority to consent to its search. She did not, however, have either actual or apparent authority to consent to his safe in the room. United States v. Jaqu, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Renter of hotel room had authority to consent to search of room but not her partner’s safe he brought to room

Vice: Motherboard: The IRS Is Being Investigated for Using Location Data Without a Warrant

Vice: Motherboard: The IRS Is Being Investigated for Using Location Data Without a Warrant (“The IRS used smartphone location data from a contractor to try and track Americans without a warrant.”)

Posted in Cell site location information, Digital privacy | Comments Off on Vice: Motherboard: The IRS Is Being Investigated for Using Location Data Without a Warrant

MI: Def’s employer’s ownership of cell phone is only a factor in REP and standing; remanded

The trial court erred in finding defendant had no standing in the cell phone he had that belonged to his employer. Ownership of the phone is only one factor in standing. People v. Paul, 2020 Mich. App. LEXIS 6637 (Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on MI: Def’s employer’s ownership of cell phone is only a factor in REP and standing; remanded

D.Idaho: Even if smell of MJ only justifies search of passenger compartment, finding nothing extends it to trunk

Defendant argues that the smell of marijuana during a traffic stop only permitted a search of the passenger compartment of his vehicle. When the officer didn’t find any marijuana there, it was justified to search the trunk. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonableness, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Even if smell of MJ only justifies search of passenger compartment, finding nothing extends it to trunk

D.Utah: Ex ante motion to suppress before SW executed denied without prejudice; must follow search

Movant has notice of a search warrant not yet executed. Her ex ante motion to quash the search warrant is denied without prejudice. Under Rule 41(h), the motion should be filed after the search occurs. United States v. Richards, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Utah: Ex ante motion to suppress before SW executed denied without prejudice; must follow search

D.S.C.: Going from and back to house after drug deals showed nexus

Defendant’s going from and back to his house after drug deals showed nexus to the house for a search warrant. United States v. Jaqu, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183603 (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2020). Plaintiff’s claim that he should have been … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Nexus, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Going from and back to house after drug deals showed nexus

Specific objection to 4A USMJ’s R&R required or waived

“Mr. Stewart did not object to the Recommended Disposition regarding whether the inevitable discovery doctrine would have led to the discovery of his felon status and unlawful possession of a weapon. When no objections are made this Court is not … Continue reading →

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on Specific objection to 4A USMJ’s R&R required or waived

N.-M.: Search incident of gym bag valid as incident to arrest when def asked for the bag to be transported with him

Defendant was assigned to Anchorage as a Marine recruiter and ended up being charged with sexual assault. On his arrest by the APD, the search incident of defendant’s gym bag for weapons incident to his arrest was valid. He asked … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on N.-M.: Search incident of gym bag valid as incident to arrest when def asked for the bag to be transported with him