Author Archives: Hall

CA9: Advancing on a prior victim with a knife resulted in a police shooting, and QI applied

“The district court found that no controlling precedent had clearly established that Omar’s right under the Fourth Amendment to be free from the excessive use of deadly force by police would be violated when he was shot and killed as … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Advancing on a prior victim with a knife resulted in a police shooting, and QI applied

M.D.Fla.: IAC for failure to investigate 4A claim fails for lack of merit on search claim

“Johnson challenges his counsel’s investigation of the charged crime and his counsel’s failure to investigate the officer involved in the search warrant, surveillance, and collection of evidence. An allegation of ‘inadequate investigation does not warrant habeas relief absent a proffer … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: IAC for failure to investigate 4A claim fails for lack of merit on search claim

Cal.4th: Google turning over CP to NCMEC was private search

Google found child pornography in emails and submitted them to NCMEC. This was a private search (which is explained in detail). It is no different than the search in Jacobsen. People v. Wilson, 2020 Cal. App. LEXIS 976 (4th Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.4th: Google turning over CP to NCMEC was private search

CA9: Tight handcuffing can be excessive force, but this wasn’t

Tight handcuffing can be excessive force. Here, plaintiff complained, and they were loosened. He had only a slight bruise. That’s normal, and summary judgment was properly granted against that claim. Reyes v. City of Santa Ana, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Motion to suppress, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: Tight handcuffing can be excessive force, but this wasn’t

NY: Ex ante DNA warrant process didn’t challenge PC and it was otherwise reasonable

In New York, a search warrant for corporeal evidence allows the target to contest the probable cause before issuance and execution of the warrant on reasonableness and probable cause. Here, defendant didn’t challenge the probable cause, and the warrant could … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NY: Ex ante DNA warrant process didn’t challenge PC and it was otherwise reasonable

TX: Is abandonment of a car also abandonment of the information in a cell phone left in it?

Dissent on denial of a petition for discretionary review: The court should decide whether fleeing a car and leaving one’s cell phone behind is abandonment. The court of appeals below held it was. Wiltz v. State, 595 S.W.3d 930, 936 … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones | Comments Off on TX: Is abandonment of a car also abandonment of the information in a cell phone left in it?

W.D.Okla.: A longstanding personal relationship between owner of premises and def didn’t confer standing without guest status

Defendant’s longstanding personal relationship with the owner of the premises searched was insufficient to show standing. He wasn’t a guest. United States v. Brooks, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195402 (W.D. Okla. Oct. 21, 2020):

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: A longstanding personal relationship between owner of premises and def didn’t confer standing without guest status

M.D.Fla.: Borrower of a rental car with a suspended DL has no standing

“Because the Eleventh Circuit has not yet addressed this issue, the Court has carefully considered the reasoning of the Lyle and Bettis cases and concludes, in line with the Second Circuit, that the unlicensed driver of a rental car should … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Borrower of a rental car with a suspended DL has no standing

PA: Mere presence of cell phones near drugs in a home isn’t PC for their search

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phones, issued months after the seizure of heroin and firearms from his home, completely lacked probable cause. The mere fact cell phones were on defendant in proximity to drugs isn’t enough, and “officer’s experience” … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on PA: Mere presence of cell phones near drugs in a home isn’t PC for their search

MS: Failure to discuss 4A claims with def isn’t IAC

Defense counsel is not shown to be ineffective merely because defense counsel didn’t advise him that a motion to suppress maybe could have been pursued. Cuevas v. State, 2020 Miss. App. LEXIS 587 (Oct. 20, 2020). Defendant’s guilty plea waived … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on MS: Failure to discuss 4A claims with def isn’t IAC

MT: Plain view justifies automobile exception search

Seeing contraband in plain view justifies an entry into a car under the automobile exception. State v. Tenold, 2020 MT 263, 2020 Mont. LEXIS 2461 (Oct. 20, 2020). Three controlled buys were probable cause despite defendant’s argument that the officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on MT: Plain view justifies automobile exception search

NYTimes: The Police Can Probably Break Into Your Phone

NYTimes: The Police Can Probably Break Into Your Phone (“At least 2,000 law enforcement agencies have tools to get into encrypted smartphones, according to new research, and they are using them far more than previously known.”)

Posted in Cell phones, Digital privacy | Comments Off on NYTimes: The Police Can Probably Break Into Your Phone

D.Minn.: SW for ion scan of door for presence of drugs was at least subject to GFE

The search warrant here for swabbing defendant’s door for an ion scan to determine presence of drugs didn’t describe what the ion scan would show. The existence of case law from at least 1999 supporting ion scan warrants satisfies good … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Good faith exception, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Minn.: SW for ion scan of door for presence of drugs was at least subject to GFE

GA: Defendant’s refusal to submit to a urine test wasn’t a 5A violation

Defendant’s refusal to submit to a urine test wasn’t a Fifth Amendment violation. Motion to suppress improperly granted. State v. Awad, 2020 Ga. App. LEXIS 589 (Oct. 20, 2020):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Privileges | Comments Off on GA: Defendant’s refusal to submit to a urine test wasn’t a 5A violation

NJ: Protective sweep of house for gun inside was unreasonable where defendant was arrested outside

Protective sweep of house for gun inside was unreasonable where defendant was arrested outside. State v. Radel, 2020 N.J. Super. LEXIS 222 (Oct. 20, 2020):

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on NJ: Protective sweep of house for gun inside was unreasonable where defendant was arrested outside

NJ.com: Murphy vetoes bills requiring cops to use body cameras, citing cost and privacy concerns

NJ.com: Murphy vetoes bills requiring cops to use body cameras, citing cost and privacy concerns by Blake Nelson (“Gov. Phil Murphy says he won’t sign two bills expanding the use of police body cameras unless lawmakers made several changes.”)

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on NJ.com: Murphy vetoes bills requiring cops to use body cameras, citing cost and privacy concerns

N.D.Ohio: Giving a drug courier a duffel bag doesn’t allow one to retain standing under a bailment or joint possession theory

Defendant did not have standing under either a bailment theory or joint possession where a drug courier allegedly hauling his meth on a Greyhound bus had the bag unreasonably seized and searched. Defendant wasn’t there observing the courier holding his … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Giving a drug courier a duffel bag doesn’t allow one to retain standing under a bailment or joint possession theory

CA7: Ptf was a trespasser who had no REP

Plaintiff as a trespasser had no reasonable expectation of privacy to make a Fourth Amendment complaint. “Just as a trespasser has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the property, a trespasser also lacks a possessory interest in the property. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf was a trespasser who had no REP

CA1: Gunshot from within while waiting for SW justified entry and sweep

Police froze and surrounded defendant’s home while they sought a search warrant. While they were waiting, a gunshot came from within, so they entered in response. The government satisfied inevitable discovery even though this protective sweep ended up in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: Gunshot from within while waiting for SW justified entry and sweep

D.D.C.: Search of def’s fanny pack wasn’t valid as search incident, but it was valid because he disclaimed it

Defendant’s front license plate being on the dashboard and not affixed to the car was a traffic offense that justified his stop. “Perhaps Giles recognizes that there was probable cause to arrest him after he refused to pull over and … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Search incident, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Search of def’s fanny pack wasn’t valid as search incident, but it was valid because he disclaimed it