Author Archives: Hall

OH5: Def didn’t abandon cell phone but it was still reasonable for officer to turn it on to see if he could ID owner

Defendant did not abandon his cell phone by leaving it charging in a vehicle (actually, it had fallen out but the charging cable was attached) where he was away from it. However, the officer reasonably could turn on the phone … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH5: Def didn’t abandon cell phone but it was still reasonable for officer to turn it on to see if he could ID owner

D.D.C.: 6A, due process, and F.R.Crim.P. 43 don’t mandate in person 4A suppression hearings during Covid

The court prefers to hold suppression hearings in person because, in many cases, it is the most important pretrial proceeding. But, while a suppression hearing is a critical stage where the right to effective assistance of counsel has attached, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.D.C.: 6A, due process, and F.R.Crim.P. 43 don’t mandate in person 4A suppression hearings during Covid

CA6: No suppression remedy for no-knock violation

The remedy for a no-knock violation is not suppression of the evidence—it’s a § 1983 action for violating the Fourth Amendment. Moreover, “An issuing judge need not eliminate every alternative explanation to find a ‘fair probability’ that contraband will be … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: No suppression remedy for no-knock violation

CA9: Violent take down of traffic detainee not resisting could be found excessive; no QI

Qualified immunity is denied officers for excessive force in a violent take down on a passively resisting plaintiff in a traffic stop without there being any exigency justifying it. “Viewing the facts, as we must, in the light most favorable … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Violent take down of traffic detainee not resisting could be found excessive; no QI

CA5: District court’s failure to credit def’s claim of possessory interest in car is affirmed

Defendant was a passenger in a car in which he claimed he had a possessory interest because it belonged to his domestic partner and he claimed to have paid $2000 toward the car. The district court didn’t credit that testimony … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: District court’s failure to credit def’s claim of possessory interest in car is affirmed

SD: Def’s assault on police officer can’t be suppressed because the arrest was illegal

Defendant’s assault on a police officer attempting to arrest her can’t be suppressed because the arrest might be unreasonable. State v. Schumacher, 2021 SD 16, 2021 S.D. LEXIS 28 (Mar. 3, 2021). The stop was valid based on a registration … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on SD: Def’s assault on police officer can’t be suppressed because the arrest was illegal

IA: Parking violation justifies police-citizen encounter

A parking violation justifies a police encounter with the driver. Here, the vehicle was obstructing, and the officer wasn’t obliged to merely leave a parking ticket on the car. The encounter led to an OWI arrest and conviction. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Parking violation justifies police-citizen encounter

N.D.Ohio: “Days-old sale” of ½ ounce of marijuana didn’t justify wholesale search of records at home

The affidavit for search warrant based on an uncorroborated CI for sale of a ½ ounce of marijuana failed to show probable cause and it did not justify a search for virtually every document in the house or on his … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Overbreadth | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: “Days-old sale” of ½ ounce of marijuana didn’t justify wholesale search of records at home

E.D.Ky.: Not all exculpatory evidence needs to be in the affidavit for SW under Franks

Omission of two allegedly exculpatory pieces of information from the affidavit for search warrant didn’t undercut the probable cause shown by what was there. Not all exculpatory information needs to be provided: “Moreover, it is unreasonable to expect a police … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Not all exculpatory evidence needs to be in the affidavit for SW under Franks

CA7: Pre-Riley warrantless cell phone search saved by GFE

Defendant’s cell phone was searched without a warrant pre-Riley under law at the time. “If the evidence collected during the search was to be admitted, he contends, it was only through the application of the good-faith exception recognized in Davis … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA7: Pre-Riley warrantless cell phone search saved by GFE

CA2: A mere hunch there was an arrest warrant made stop unreasonable

It was clearly established law in January 2015 that an officer’s unconfirmed hunch that an arrest warrant might possibly exist, coupled with nothing more than the officer’s recognition of a suspect from prior arrests, did not constitute reasonable suspicion justifying … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA2: A mere hunch there was an arrest warrant made stop unreasonable

CA7: Showing up for a controlled buy justifies automobile exception search

A prior controlled buy with defendant showing up for another one justifies a vehicle search under the automobile exception. United States v. Smith, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 6166 (7th Cir. Mar. 3, 2021). The trial court credited the officer’s testimony … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on CA7: Showing up for a controlled buy justifies automobile exception search

CA11: Arrest at the threshold that continued inside where def tried to enter was reasonable

Officers on patrol saw defendant in an apartment building’s parking lot. They saw the bulge they reasonably believed was a gun, and they knew he was a convicted felon. They sought an encounter with him, but defendant refused to stop … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA11: Arrest at the threshold that continued inside where def tried to enter was reasonable

E.D.Tex.: 4A arrest claim also subject to Stone bar

Defendant’s 2254 claim that his arrest was without probable cause on mistaken identity is foreclosed by Stone v. Powell the same as Fourth Amendment search claims. “The opportunity, regardless of whether it is acted upon at the state level, is … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: 4A arrest claim also subject to Stone bar

CA1: Breaking the excessive force claim into parts for analysis results in a denial of QI

The officers do not get qualified immunity in this 1983 case. “Certainly, this was not an ‘obvious case’ where the officers so blatantly violated the Fourth Amendment that recourse to factually analogous case law is unnecessary. Wesby, 138 S. Ct. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Waiver | Comments Off on CA1: Breaking the excessive force claim into parts for analysis results in a denial of QI

MO: DNA could be taken from def’s genitalia without a warrant on arrest shortly after alleged crime because of exigency

Exigent circumstances permitted the police to take DNA samples from defendant’s genitalia within minutes of an alleged rape. Time was of the essence because the DNA could be lost if defendant were left to his own devices or even possibly … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Consent, DNA | Comments Off on MO: DNA could be taken from def’s genitalia without a warrant on arrest shortly after alleged crime because of exigency

S.D.N.Y.: HomeAway and AirBnb prevailing parties in their data collection suit v. NYC

HomeAway.com and AirBnb.com were prevailing parties in their Fourth Amendment claims against the City of New York for sweeping data production, and they are awarded $595,000 in attorneys fees. HomeAway.com, Inc. v. City of New York, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: HomeAway and AirBnb prevailing parties in their data collection suit v. NYC

Reason: After the Cops Seized Her Car, the Government Waited Five Years Before Giving Her a Chance To Get It Back

Reason: After the Cops Seized Her Car, the Government Waited Five Years Before Giving Her a Chance To Get It Back by Jacob Sullum (“In Massachusetts, Malinda Harris argues, civil asset forfeiture routinely violates the right to due process.”)

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: After the Cops Seized Her Car, the Government Waited Five Years Before Giving Her a Chance To Get It Back

S.D.N.Y.: Random Covid testing reasonable search under special needs doctrine

Assuming random Covid testing of NYC school children is a Fourth Amendment search, the court applies Vernonia School District 47J and special needs and finds it reasonable. Aviles v. De Blasio, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38930 (S.D. N.Y. Mar. 2, … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, School searches, Special needs | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Random Covid testing reasonable search under special needs doctrine

CA11: Def doesn’t show searching officer’s arrest two years after his trial would have changed outcome for successor habeas

Defendant’s searching officer’s arrest two years after defendant’s conviction didn’t qualify for a successor habeas because he couldn’t show that the new information would have affected the officer’s credibility at a suppression hearing or trial, nor does he allege prejudice. … Continue reading →

Posted in Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA11: Def doesn’t show searching officer’s arrest two years after his trial would have changed outcome for successor habeas