Author Archives: Hall

N.D.Okla.: Officer’s testimony of traffic offense wasn’t believed based on his words on video

“Considering the totality of the circumstances, the Court finds that Phillips’ testimony that he observed a lane violation prior to initiating a traffic stop is not credible. The only evidence tending to support the commission of a traffic violation is … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Officer’s testimony of traffic offense wasn’t believed based on his words on video

CA6: Failure to file state SW papers with clerk not 4A violation

Failure to file the state search warrant papers with the state clerk under state law is not a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Baker, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 9315 (6th Cir. Apr. 5, 2022). The signed affidavit being incorporated … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA6: Failure to file state SW papers with clerk not 4A violation

MA: Dog alert to buttocks PC for strip search

After witnessing suspicious movement, and observing white powder on the vehicle dashboard where defendant had been sitting, police had probable cause to arrest defendant on drug charges and consequently were justified in conducting a search of the defendant incident to … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on MA: Dog alert to buttocks PC for strip search

Rawstory: ‘Outrageous’: Judges slam FBI for not breaking down rich suspect’s front door to preserve ‘aesthetics’

Rawstory: ‘Outrageous’: Judges slam FBI for not breaking down rich suspect’s front door to preserve ‘aesthetics’ by Matthew Chapman (argument video, too):

Posted in Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Rawstory: ‘Outrageous’: Judges slam FBI for not breaking down rich suspect’s front door to preserve ‘aesthetics’

W.D.Ky.: Crime victim with animosity toward def is not unreliable CI just because of that

A crime victim isn’t unreliable for informant hearsay just because of animosity toward the defendant. United States v. Collins, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63999 (W.D.Ky. Feb. 7, 2022). The trial court erred in finding defendant’s consent to a blood draw … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, Standards of review, Voluntariness | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Crime victim with animosity toward def is not unreliable CI just because of that

VA: Firefighters could call ME and police for dead body

When firefighters entered defendant’s property in response to a fire call, they found a body. It was within the scope of the fire entry to call the police and medical examiner. “Thus, all that the firefighters observed was no longer … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on VA: Firefighters could call ME and police for dead body

OR: Officer’s conclusion def violated traffic law here not reasonable

The officer’s conclusion defendant violated a traffic law here wasn’t a reasonable conclusion, and the motion to suppress should have been granted. State v. Brown, 318 Ore. App. 713, 2022 Ore. App. LEXIS 585 (Apr. 6, 2022). A named CI’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on OR: Officer’s conclusion def violated traffic law here not reasonable

CA3: “[R]easonableness [of force] under the Fourth Amendment should frequently remain a question for the jury”

“Given the totality of the circumstances, the District Court erred in concluding as a matter of law that the use of force was objectively reasonable. See Giles v. Kearney, 571 F.3d 318, 327 n.4 (3d Cir. 2009) (denying summary judgment … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: “[R]easonableness [of force] under the Fourth Amendment should frequently remain a question for the jury”

NJ: Destruction of recording of telephonic SW application requires suppression

State’s destruction of recording of a telephonic warrant application for weapons in a domestic violence case leads to suppression of the search in New Jersey. The prejudice to defendant is because he can’t now challenge the search without it. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on NJ: Destruction of recording of telephonic SW application requires suppression

Another crime leads to more surveillance

The Hill: Former federal prosecutor says Jan. 6 led to FBI increasing surveillance of American public by Brad Dress (“Journalist and former federal prosecutor Ankush Khardori on Wednesday contended that the events of January 6 have led to the increased … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Another crime leads to more surveillance

Crime Report: Installing a Security Camera? In Chicago That Will Earn $$$

Crime Report: Installing a Security Camera? In Chicago That Will Earn $$$ by TCR staff (“Chicago authorities have announced a new program that reimburses residents and businesses for installing security cameras. There’s one caveat: the cameras must be registered with … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on Crime Report: Installing a Security Camera? In Chicago That Will Earn $$$

D.N.J.: Whether this state court judge could legally issue a telephonic warrant isn’t a 4A violation

Whether a lower court judge could issue a telephonic search warrant under state law doesn’t matter in federal court or the Fourth Amendment. “To begin with, the defendant raises at best a state-law technicality that is not of federal constitutional … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Whether this state court judge could legally issue a telephonic warrant isn’t a 4A violation

Virginia Mercury: Virginia police routinely use secret GPS pings to track people’s cell phones

Virginia Mercury: Virginia police routinely use secret GPS pings to track people’s cell phones by Ned Oliver (“‘It’s as if the police tagged them with a chip under their skin’”):

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on Virginia Mercury: Virginia police routinely use secret GPS pings to track people’s cell phones

Since Sen. Cotton is one of my senators …

and I’ve been a criminal defender since November 1979 (after my stint at the local prosecutor’s office from mid-1973): WaPo: Cruz and Cotton cut to the chase on GOP’s suspicion of defense lawyers by Aaron Blake (“With their criticisms of … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Since Sen. Cotton is one of my senators …

N.-M.: In applying cost-benefits analysis of exclusionary rule, this was more than mere negligence and exclusion was necessary

In a military prosecution for adultery, the military judge found the search of defendant’s cell phone unreasonable and a violation of the Fourth Amendment but refused to suppress in its cost-benefits analysis. The court of appeals disagreed and found the … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on N.-M.: In applying cost-benefits analysis of exclusionary rule, this was more than mere negligence and exclusion was necessary

CA3: Def’s flight before the “Rodriguez moment” was on him

“We have ‘recognized the possibility that the Rodriguez moment occurs when an officer no longer pursues the tasks tied to the traffic stop even though he reasonably could have continued with those tasks.’ Garner, 961 F.3d at 270 (citing Green, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Def’s flight before the “Rodriguez moment” was on him

PA: No apparent authority that def’s mother, a visitor outside, could consent to search

There was no apparent authority for defendant’s mother to consent to police entry. They knew she was a mere visitor herself, and she offered to let them in. She was not inside; she just came up when they were there. … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Excessive force | Comments Off on PA: No apparent authority that def’s mother, a visitor outside, could consent to search

D.Colo.: A vehicle search for MJ that might have been legally possessed under CO law was still potentially a violation of federal law, and federal law controls

The probable cause analysis for arrest and search is the same. Defendant’s car was searched under the automobile exception in Colorado, and a quantity of marijuana was found. Federal law controls here (Virginia v. Moore), not state law and whether … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Colo.: A vehicle search for MJ that might have been legally possessed under CO law was still potentially a violation of federal law, and federal law controls

NC: Potential for destruction of car keys was not exigency here

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a house he was visiting along with others late at night. When the police knocked, he answered the door, and that connoted some control over the premises. His disclaimer of ownership of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NC: Potential for destruction of car keys was not exigency here

WaPo: What to know about no-knock warrants

WaPo: What to know about no-knock warrants by Courtney Kan, Nicole Dungca, and Jenn Abelson (“No-knock raids, considered one of the most dangerous and intrusive policing tactics, have been at the center of a debate in recent years over police … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on WaPo: What to know about no-knock warrants