OR: Officer’s conclusion def violated traffic law here not reasonable

The officer’s conclusion defendant violated a traffic law here wasn’t a reasonable conclusion, and the motion to suppress should have been granted. State v. Brown, 318 Ore. App. 713, 2022 Ore. App. LEXIS 585 (Apr. 6, 2022).

A named CI’s statement he witnessed defendant’s crime is a strong factor in the CI’s reliability. United States v. Bryant, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 9091 (6th Cir. Apr. 4, 2022).

Defendant’s car was validly searched either as a search incident or a protective sweep for weapons. It was unnecessary for the trial court to even go into Rodriguez. Creller v. State, 2022 Fla. App. LEXIS 2518 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr. 6, 2022).*

Defendant’s Franks motion fails because the alleged omissions were neither reckless or intended to mislead the magistrate. Moreover, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Roberts, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63564 (E.D.Tex. Mar. 24, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonableness, Search incident. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.