Daily Archives: August 3, 2024

CA4: Unlocking a door to police knocks and opening it slightly is not consent to enter

Unlocking a door, here that opens out, when the police are knocking is not implied consent to enter. Quinn v. Zerkle, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19154 (4th Cir. Aug. 1, 2024). There was a reckless geographical error in the affidavit … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Consent, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Unlocking a door to police knocks and opening it slightly is not consent to enter

IL: Invited guest in home can refuse contact with police at door without violating law

As an invited guest into the home, defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy and right to refuse contact with the police at the door without violating the law. People v. Jones, 2024 IL App (1st) 221555, 2024 Ill. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on IL: Invited guest in home can refuse contact with police at door without violating law

CA7: Franks does not apply to emergency cell phone pings

During the George Floyd murder unrest, defendant told an acquaintance he was traveling to Wisconsin with a machine gun to kill and loot. The acquaintance told law enforcement. They obtained ping information based on exigency, which was valid. Also, Franks … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA7: Franks does not apply to emergency cell phone pings

CA6: Knowing of a search starts the SoL from any claim on it

Knowing of a search starts the statute of limitations for any claim on it. Reguli v. Russ, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19008 (6th Cir. July 31, 2024). Defendant waived his motion to suppress by not adequately supporting it with factual … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Knowing of a search starts the SoL from any claim on it

TX: Court of Appeals required state to show more than necessary to show cell phone nexus; remanded

“To the extent that the court of appeals read our opinion in Baldwin necessarily to require, as a prerequisite of probable cause, that an affidavit must establish (1) use of the cell phone either during, or immediately before or after, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on TX: Court of Appeals required state to show more than necessary to show cell phone nexus; remanded

OR: First cell phone SW found unexpected SD card, second SW was tainted by overbreadth of first

Defendant’s cell phone was seized in 2011 and an SD card was unexpectedly found with sexual images of children. When defendant questioned that, a separate search warrant was sought for the SD card. The state does not show inevitable discovery … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Overbreadth | Comments Off on OR: First cell phone SW found unexpected SD card, second SW was tainted by overbreadth of first