Daily Archives: August 18, 2024

CA4: GPS monitoring for first six months of supervised release was not abuse of discretion [subtext: seems reasonable]

Six months of GPS monitoring of defendant on supervised release was tailored to him and not an abuse of discretion. It was a burden, but those on supervised release have far diminished expectations of privacy. United States v. Ellis, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA4: GPS monitoring for first six months of supervised release was not abuse of discretion [subtext: seems reasonable]

CA9: Dog handler allegedly allowing police dog to excessively bite ptf denied QI

“Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Rock, Miller allowed the canine to continue biting Rock even though he was unarmed, did not present an immediate threat to the officers or others, and did not resist or actively … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Dog handler allegedly allowing police dog to excessively bite ptf denied QI

N.D.Ga.: Merely repeating the 4A argument to the USMJ isn’t a sufficient objection to the R&R

“Defendant does not explain how the Magistrate Judge erred in her consideration of this [Fourth Amendment] argument or explanation of the binding precedent that compelled her conclusion; he merely reiterates his prior argument on this issue. This is not a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Merely repeating the 4A argument to the USMJ isn’t a sufficient objection to the R&R

CA10: Merely citing the 4A without explanation didn’t preserve the argument made on appeal

Plaintiff’s sole search claim that officers “in so doing unjustifiably trespassed on his Fourth Amendment right to privacy” did not put the district court on notice of his specific claim now asserted on appeal. United States v. Murillo-Gonzalez, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: Merely citing the 4A without explanation didn’t preserve the argument made on appeal

N.D.Cal.: iCloud SW was particular as to subject and time

This iCloud warrant was based on probable cause and was particular and had a specific time limit. “Certain of the categories of evidence authorized for seizure by the February iCloud Warrant may appear overbroad in isolation but are sufficiently particular … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: iCloud SW was particular as to subject and time