Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA5 explaining clearly established law, again; fair notice to police

CA5 explaining clearly established law, again. Elizondo v. Hinote, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 3713 (5th Cir. Feb. 5, 2026)*:

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5 explaining clearly established law, again; fair notice to police

CA6: Flock violated no duty to ptf when he was stopped based on police mistake, if there was one

Plaintiff sued Flock because he was stopped but then released because his LPN was put on a “hot list” by police, apparently mistakenly. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his LPN, and his stop was by the police, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Flock violated no duty to ptf when he was stopped based on police mistake, if there was one

CA5: Cardiac arrest during police training wasn’t a 4A seizure

“Appellant Brittney Kennedy appeals the dismissal of constitutional claims she brought on behalf of her deceased husband, Marquis Kennedy, who suffered a cardiac arrest after a self-defense simulation for police-cadet training. She claims the district court erred by concluding that … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: Cardiac arrest during police training wasn’t a 4A seizure

CA10: Consent search of house for medical furlough from hospital after being brought there by police wasn’t coerced

Defendant was detained for DUI, but he had medical issues and police wanted to release him to home under a “medical furlough.” He consented to an inspection of his house and weapons were found. He was never in custody, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Consent search of house for medical furlough from hospital after being brought there by police wasn’t coerced

CA9: No QI for knowingly presenting material false testimony in support of a warrant

No qualified immunity for knowingly presenting material false testimony in support of a warrant. Gibson v. City of Portland, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 2646 (9th Cir. Jan. 29, 2026). As to Franks: “Even if there were a material omission, inclusion … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: No QI for knowingly presenting material false testimony in support of a warrant

E.D.N.C.: No REP in one’s own property in a stolen car

Defendant was in a stolen car, so no standing at all under Byrd. (The convoluted issue of search incident after Gant with Fourth Circuit authority never revisited is avoided for now.) United States v. Tyson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15809 … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: No REP in one’s own property in a stolen car

D.N.M.: Impoundment of backpack not shown proper under police procedures

The impoundment of defendant’s car and his backpack from an apartment complex parking lot was not shown to be within the standardized procedures of the department. That’s the government’s burden. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Majedi, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Impoundment of backpack not shown proper under police procedures

MA: Missing juvenile in BOLO was subject to community caretaking function

On a traffic stop, the juvenile was recognized from a BOLO as missing. That then involved the community caretaking function. Commonwealth v. Demos D., 2026 Mass. LEXIS 6 (Jan. 13, 2026). There was reasonable suspicion for stopping plaintiff where he … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Missing juvenile in BOLO was subject to community caretaking function

N.D.Iowa: Affidavit for SW could have been more explicit, but it still was good enough for PC

The affidavit for warrant isn’t perfect but it’s good enough for the issuing magistrate to draw inferences. “Again, the affidavit could have been improved with explicit explanations of the ‘how’ and ‘why.’ But I do not fault an experienced judge … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Affidavit for SW could have been more explicit, but it still was good enough for PC

GA: REP against dog sniff at apartment door in gated complex where management let police in

A dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door seams was unreasonable, despite it being in a common area of a gated apartment building [where the general public wasn’t allowed, but management let the police in]. State v. West, 2026 Ga. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on GA: REP against dog sniff at apartment door in gated complex where management let police in

CA9: RIPP restraint was seizure and no QI here

Decedent died in a police car with an RIPP restraint bending him backwards. That’s a seizure, and the officers here do not get qualified immunity in the excessive force claim. Gonzalez v. City of Phx., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 426 … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: RIPP restraint was seizure and no QI here

LATimes: Why LAPD and other police agencies discourage shooting at cars — and why ICE still does

LATimes: Why LAPD and other police agencies discourage shooting at cars — and why ICE still does by Libor Jany:

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on LATimes: Why LAPD and other police agencies discourage shooting at cars — and why ICE still does

TN: Not objecting to SW affidavit at trial here not IAC; it fit defense theory

Defense counsel didn’t object to the search warrant and application coming into evidence in the state’s case because it fit within the defense theory, despite being full of hearsay, assuming defendant would testify, as he said he would. Then he … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on TN: Not objecting to SW affidavit at trial here not IAC; it fit defense theory

CA6: 4A doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness

A three-week-old controlled buy was part of the probable cause. The Fourth Amendment doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness. Nexus was clear: “The nexus in this case, by contrast, left nothing to the imagination.” Police used pole camera surveillance … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: 4A doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness

W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

No clear line of cases suggests the officer’s searching inside plaintiff’s underwear was unreasonable where it was not seen by anyone else. “Plaintiff’s right to be free from such a search was not clearly established at that time and Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

FL: Request for consent after stop outside city jurisdiction was reasonable

A municipal police officer had authority to request consent after a stop outside his territorial jurisdiction. One justice concurring said that’s not a Fourth Amendment violation anyway, and suppression wouldn’t be an appropriate remedy. State v. Repple, 2025 Fla. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on FL: Request for consent after stop outside city jurisdiction was reasonable

CA9: Taking too long to get SW for phone violated clearly established law

The officer here violated clearly established law by taking too long to apply for a warrant to search plaintiff’s cell phone. Plaintiff promptly sought its return, but that was denied because the officer hadn’t got a warrant yet. Langham v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Taking too long to get SW for phone violated clearly established law

MO: State can waive requirement of written motion to suppress

While statute requires a written motion to suppress, the state can agree to it being oral, which happened here. Defendant loses on the merits, however, for exigent circumstances. State v. Yates, 2025 Mo. App. LEXIS 839 (Dec. 9, 2025). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Excessive force, Motion to suppress, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on MO: State can waive requirement of written motion to suppress

LA: Communal parking area at a “trailer park” was not curtilage

Defendant’s car in a “trailer park” communal parking area near his place was not on his “curtilage.” The court of appeals erred in finding it was curtilage. State v. Charles, 2025 La. LEXIS 1624 (Nov. 19, 2025). “Here, the renewed … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on LA: Communal parking area at a “trailer park” was not curtilage

FL4: Welfare check not unreasonable just because a crime might also be involved

A 911 call about a potential impaired driver with kids in the car justified the officer’s interaction with the defendant. A welfare community caretaking check isn’t unreasonable just because it’s intertwined with a potential crime. Children can’t be expected to … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on FL4: Welfare check not unreasonable just because a crime might also be involved