Category Archives: Qualified immunity

LATimes: Why LAPD and other police agencies discourage shooting at cars — and why ICE still does

LATimes: Why LAPD and other police agencies discourage shooting at cars — and why ICE still does by Libor Jany:

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on LATimes: Why LAPD and other police agencies discourage shooting at cars — and why ICE still does

TN: Not objecting to SW affidavit at trial here not IAC; it fit defense theory

Defense counsel didn’t object to the search warrant and application coming into evidence in the state’s case because it fit within the defense theory, despite being full of hearsay, assuming defendant would testify, as he said he would. Then he … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on TN: Not objecting to SW affidavit at trial here not IAC; it fit defense theory

CA6: 4A doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness

A three-week-old controlled buy was part of the probable cause. The Fourth Amendment doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness. Nexus was clear: “The nexus in this case, by contrast, left nothing to the imagination.” Police used pole camera surveillance … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: 4A doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness

W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

No clear line of cases suggests the officer’s searching inside plaintiff’s underwear was unreasonable where it was not seen by anyone else. “Plaintiff’s right to be free from such a search was not clearly established at that time and Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

FL: Request for consent after stop outside city jurisdiction was reasonable

A municipal police officer had authority to request consent after a stop outside his territorial jurisdiction. One justice concurring said that’s not a Fourth Amendment violation anyway, and suppression wouldn’t be an appropriate remedy. State v. Repple, 2025 Fla. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on FL: Request for consent after stop outside city jurisdiction was reasonable

CA9: Taking too long to get SW for phone violated clearly established law

The officer here violated clearly established law by taking too long to apply for a warrant to search plaintiff’s cell phone. Plaintiff promptly sought its return, but that was denied because the officer hadn’t got a warrant yet. Langham v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Taking too long to get SW for phone violated clearly established law

MO: State can waive requirement of written motion to suppress

While statute requires a written motion to suppress, the state can agree to it being oral, which happened here. Defendant loses on the merits, however, for exigent circumstances. State v. Yates, 2025 Mo. App. LEXIS 839 (Dec. 9, 2025). The … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Excessive force, Motion to suppress, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on MO: State can waive requirement of written motion to suppress

LA: Communal parking area at a “trailer park” was not curtilage

Defendant’s car in a “trailer park” communal parking area near his place was not on his “curtilage.” The court of appeals erred in finding it was curtilage. State v. Charles, 2025 La. LEXIS 1624 (Nov. 19, 2025). “Here, the renewed … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on LA: Communal parking area at a “trailer park” was not curtilage

FL4: Welfare check not unreasonable just because a crime might also be involved

A 911 call about a potential impaired driver with kids in the car justified the officer’s interaction with the defendant. A welfare community caretaking check isn’t unreasonable just because it’s intertwined with a potential crime. Children can’t be expected to … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on FL4: Welfare check not unreasonable just because a crime might also be involved

D.N.M.: SW nondisclosure order denied for lack of supervisor certification

In re Application for AT&T Non-Disclosure Order, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218179 (D.N.M. Nov. 4, 2025), is denied for lack of certification from a supervising official as required by statute. Defendant was subject to a probation search waiver, and there … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Nondisclosure order, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.N.M.: SW nondisclosure order denied for lack of supervisor certification

S.D.N.Y.: No REP in one’s talking to oneself in a building elevator that security cameras picked up

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in talking to himself in his building elevator. Therefore, Title III didn’t apply. He knew there was video recording but not audio. “While in the elevator, Plaintiff writes that that is when he … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No REP in one’s talking to oneself in a building elevator that security cameras picked up

S.D.Tex.: When officer knows RS for stop ceases to exist, checking license and papers unreasonable

Having discovered that there was no legal basis for defendant’s stop, asking for papers unreasonably extended the stop. “Broadening Rodriguez to allow officers to inspect documents when they are already aware that no violation has occurred would effectively sanction random … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: When officer knows RS for stop ceases to exist, checking license and papers unreasonable

D.Alaska: Sharing cell phone gives standing

Defendant shared the iPhone of another person, so he had standing to contest its search. United States v. Powers, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192621 (D. Alaska Sep. 30, 2025). Defendants don’t get qualified immunity. The jury could conclude that more … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Sharing cell phone gives standing

OH5: Alleged jurisdictional defect in warrant issuance didn’t undermine PC; no dispute as to that

Alleged defects in which court should or could issue this particular warrant was subject to the good faith exception. There was no contention that the affidavit for warrant lacked probable cause. State v. Wharton, 2025-Ohio-4485 (5th Dist. Sep. 25, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on OH5: Alleged jurisdictional defect in warrant issuance didn’t undermine PC; no dispute as to that

IA: RS for this DUI stop was the gait of def walking toward his car

Reasonable suspicion for this DUI stop was the gait of defendant walking toward his car. State v. Nockels, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 812 (Sep. 17, 2025). Plaintiff was hurt during police response to a domestic dispute. “Hoover filed this suit … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: RS for this DUI stop was the gait of def walking toward his car

W.D.Wis.: § 1983 search claim producing $4,000 damages verdict supported $84,690 in attorneys fees

Plaintiff’s § 1983 search claim produced a damages verdict for $500 compensatory and $3500 punitive. The attorney’s fees award of $84,690.00 is granted. Pfalzgraf v. Reisner, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168405 (W.D. Wis. Aug. 28, 2025). Cracked windshield and tinted … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: § 1983 search claim producing $4,000 damages verdict supported $84,690 in attorneys fees

CA8: A summons to come to court is not a 4A seizure

A summons to come to court is not a Fourth Amendment seizure. Brown v. City of Dermott, Arkansas, 23-3073 (8th Cir. Aug. 19, 2025). The search of defendant’s vehicle was valid both under the automobile exception and inventory. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: A summons to come to court is not a 4A seizure

Guam case shows: Don’t cross examine about the CI without a clear goal in mind

This started with a CI for a search warrant, but the hearing on the motion to suppress revealed there were actually three others. That information was outside the “four corners” but it cemented the probable cause. Guam v. Guerrero, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Guam case shows: Don’t cross examine about the CI without a clear goal in mind

CA5: Officer’s resting hand on truck while talking to def wasn’t a seizure

The officer resting his hand on defendant’s truck while talking to him during a stop was not a separate seizure of him. United States v. Larremore, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20757 (5th Cir. Aug. 14, 2025). The closest case plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Qualified immunity, Seizure, Standards of review, Trespass | Comments Off on CA5: Officer’s resting hand on truck while talking to def wasn’t a seizure

CA11: RS required for a prison visitor’s strip search; out of circuit authority can be considered in whether the law is clearly established

Reasonable suspicion is required for a prison visitor’s strip search. Out of circuit authority can be considered in whether the law is clearly established. Here it essentially was. Gilmore v. Ga. Dept. of Corr., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17209 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA11: RS required for a prison visitor’s strip search; out of circuit authority can be considered in whether the law is clearly established