Category Archives: Qualified immunity

D.D.C.: CI’s single controlled buy off def was PC

A single controlled buy from defendant’s home is probable cause without additional corroboration. Moreover, the CI had worked for MPD for a decade. United States v. Hill, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238824 (D.D.C. Dec. 14, 2021). The fire department responded … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.D.C.: CI’s single controlled buy off def was PC

N.D.Ind.: 2254(d) “unreasonable application” review considered whether correct case law applied

In this 2254, the argument was that the state court’s application of law violated 2254’s “unreasonable” application standard, but it didn’t. The question was whether Michigan v. Long or Arizona v. Gant applies. “In sum, the State courts’ reliance on … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Seizure, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: 2254(d) “unreasonable application” review considered whether correct case law applied

MI: Inventory was reasonable and not pretextual

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the inventory search of defendant’s car because the inventory was reasonable. After the arrest of the occupants, the vehicle had to be towed, and the inventory was within policy and not a pretext … Continue reading

Posted in Hot pursuit, Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on MI: Inventory was reasonable and not pretextual

W.D.Tex.: Case on taking key from a child for police to enter house will go to a jury; no exigency, no QI

Using key obtained from a teenage daughter’s bra, in handcuffs a block away, the mom and two other daughters get to present their case to a jury that police used the key to unreasonably enter the house without announcement. E.R. … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Case on taking key from a child for police to enter house will go to a jury; no exigency, no QI

FL1: Alleged statutory violation for seizing alcohol abusers not subject to any exclusionary rule

An officer’s alleged violation of statutory procedures for dealing with alcohol abusers they encounter is not subject to an exclusionary rule. Nothing in the statute even suggests it. Jones v. State, 2021 Fla. App. LEXIS 15097 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on FL1: Alleged statutory violation for seizing alcohol abusers not subject to any exclusionary rule

M.D.Pa.: Tracking data obtained by SW is not testimonial for Crawford purposes

Tracking data on defendant’s vehicle in a stalking investigation was not testimonial for Crawford purposes, and it comes in as a business record. United States v. Miah, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224557 (M.D.Pa. Nov. 22, 2021). A citizen complaint against … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Tracking data obtained by SW is not testimonial for Crawford purposes

N.D.Ohio: One day delay of package in transit was reasonable

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of a parcel of drugs. “Even if Defendant could challenge the delay of delivering the Target Parcel, his argument fails. While ‘theoretically’ the ‘detention of mail could at some point become an unreasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Mail and packages, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: One day delay of package in transit was reasonable

CA6: Shooting a man in the back for lawfully carrying a gun doesn’t get QI [yet D.Ct. bought it]

The district court erred by granting the police officer summary judgment as to plaintiff’s excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment. Accepting plaintiff’s account of the incident, the officer violated plaintiff’s clearly established rights when he shot him six times … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Shooting a man in the back for lawfully carrying a gun doesn’t get QI [yet D.Ct. bought it]

CA11: No QI where ptf showed potential false arrest and lengthy detention where crime lab found no drugs

Plaintiff showed sufficient evidence to have a jury decide that her jaywalking arrest was bogus and that led to finding alleged cocaine. Instead, the supposed cocaine was sand leaking from a stress ball that allegedly tested positive for cocaine in … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: No QI where ptf showed potential false arrest and lengthy detention where crime lab found no drugs

CA4: Choking out and killing a mentally ill man who only vaguely threatened himself was excessive force

“This appeal arises from a tragic incident that led to the death of Joshua Lawhon, an unarmed mentally ill man. Invoking 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Virginia state law, Lawhon’s mother, as administrator of his estate, brought this action against … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Choking out and killing a mentally ill man who only vaguely threatened himself was excessive force

CA6: Individual officer not responsible for process that denied ptf prompt PC hearing under Riverside

While an arrested person has a right to a prompt judicial determination of probable cause for the arrest, it’s not necessarily on the officer to get the person before a magistrate. “[I]t was not objectively unreasonable for Wynkoop to expect … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Individual officer not responsible for process that denied ptf prompt PC hearing under Riverside

E.D.N.Y.: Handing over DL on request for police look wasn’t a seizure

Defendant was asked by the police for his ID. He gave it over and they noted it and gave it back. This was not a seizure. United States v. Stephenson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206467 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2021).* Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Handing over DL on request for police look wasn’t a seizure

N.D.N.Y.: Def’s additional exculpatory facts don’t undermine PC

There was plenty of probable cause for defendant’s arrest in his house based on statements and what the police learned in their child pornography investigation. “On top of that, the images already recovered from defendant’s devices were also more than … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Def’s additional exculpatory facts don’t undermine PC

CO: Anonymous, uncorroborated, and stale tip on school safety hotline not RS

An anonymous tip through a school safety hotline was also uncorroborated and stale and did not provide reasonable suspicion for a school search. In the Interest of C.C-S., 2021COA127, 2021 Colo. App. LEXIS 1440 (Oct. 20, 2021). See techdirt: Students … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, School searches, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CO: Anonymous, uncorroborated, and stale tip on school safety hotline not RS

SCOTUS: CA10 rule on recklessly causing an otherwise reasonable shooting rejected; QI applies

Tenth Circuit’s rule that officers can recklessly cause an otherwise reasonable shooting was not based on clearly established law. Thus, qualified immunity applies. City of Tahlequah v. Bond, 2021 U.S. LEXIS 5310 (Oct. 18, 2021) (per curiam)*:

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on SCOTUS: CA10 rule on recklessly causing an otherwise reasonable shooting rejected; QI applies

CA8: Running a false affidavit through the prosecutor doesn’t create QI

Running an allegedly false affidavit through the prosecutor doesn’t create qualified immunity for the affidavit. Wheeler v. City of Searcy, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 29364 (8th Cir. Sept. 29, 2021). The New Jersey Division of Child Protection & Permanency (“DCPP”) … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Private search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Running a false affidavit through the prosecutor doesn’t create QI

CA8: Unnecessary prolonged handcuffing of ptf overcame QI; if there was a reason for it, it had long passed

Plaintiff overcame qualified immunity here because he was unnecessarily left handcuffed without any objective reason for it. There was no reasonable suspicion. Haynes v. Minnehan, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 28550 (8th Cir. Sept. 21, 2021). In this prison search case, … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Unnecessary prolonged handcuffing of ptf overcame QI; if there was a reason for it, it had long passed

OH12: Second patdown in crotch area by male officer wasn’t unreasonable

A female officer patted this male defendant down, but she did not go around the crotch area. For officer safety, a male officer followed up and did. This was reasonable, and the contraband was found by plain feel. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk, Waiver | Comments Off on OH12: Second patdown in crotch area by male officer wasn’t unreasonable

NY Times: If the Police Lie, Should They Be Held Liable? Often the Answer Is No.

NY Times: If the Police Lie, Should They Be Held Liable? Often the Answer Is No. by Shaila Dewan (“Federal agents and police officers who work with them are often immune from lawsuits, even for serious rights violations. The Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NY Times: If the Police Lie, Should They Be Held Liable? Often the Answer Is No.

CA11: Ga. Ct. App. case on point not “clearly established law”

“Orr argues, nevertheless, that it was clearly established that the Deputies could not search him and seize his property pursuant to the order, citing State v. Burgess, 826 S.E.2d 352 (Ga. App. 2019). We disagree. For starters, Burgess is an … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Ga. Ct. App. case on point not “clearly established law”