Category Archives: Franks doctrine

E.D.Cal.: Material information relevant to a Franks challenge was withheld by the gov’t, and the court finds a Brady violation

Material information relevant to a Franks challenge was withheld by the government, and the court finds a Brady violation. If known to defendant, the outcome might have been different. United States v. Sheikh, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97663 (E.D. Cal. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Material information relevant to a Franks challenge was withheld by the gov’t, and the court finds a Brady violation

TX14: No RS for going up to parked car in parking lot without RS

The officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop and talk to defendant sitting in a car with another in a parking lot at night doing nothing. The area was considered high crime, but there was nothing suggesting any need … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX14: No RS for going up to parked car in parking lot without RS

MN: McNeely retroactive under Birchfield

“The rule announced in Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. 141, 133 S. Ct. 1552 (2013), that the dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream is not a per se exigency justifying the warrantless search of a suspected impaired driver-applies retroactively when … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MN: McNeely retroactive under Birchfield

Franks from IL and CA

The affidavit for this search warrant from a 1992 California murder did not include intentional falsities or misrepresentations. The affiant summarized witnesses’ versions of defendant’s description. Even if they were false, removing them from the affidavit still leaves probable cause. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on Franks from IL and CA

E.D.Ark.: “After editing out the incomplete and false portions of the warrant affidavit, the remaining information was insufficient to establish” PC

“After editing out the incomplete and false portions of the warrant affidavit, the remaining information was insufficient to establish that Green was dead and that his death was caused by the criminal act of another person. Accordingly, the Court finds … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: “After editing out the incomplete and false portions of the warrant affidavit, the remaining information was insufficient to establish” PC

M.D.Tenn.: Failure to corroborate everything, even the easy to corroborate, isn’t reckless under Franks

Defendant did not make a substantial preliminary showing that there was a reckless material statement in support of the search warrant. Moreover, “Defendant provides no authority to support his position that an officer’s failure to corroborate a fact that ‘could … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Failure to corroborate everything, even the easy to corroborate, isn’t reckless under Franks

D.Nev.: Franks challenges have two elements; failure of one is failure of the claim

The court can resolve Franks challenges by answering the easiest of the two questions, falsity or materiality, since both are required. Here, the alleged falsity wasn’t material to the probable cause determination, and that ends the inquiry. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Franks challenges have two elements; failure of one is failure of the claim

CA6: Lack of PC for SW doesn’t deprive court of jurisdiction over criminal case

In seeking a successor habeas petition, inter alia: (1) all the alleged ineffective assistance claims were known at the time of the original petition; (2) “Joy’s claim that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over his prosecution because the search-warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Lack of PC for SW doesn’t deprive court of jurisdiction over criminal case

OH5: Walking down the middle of the street at night in a high crime area justified a patdown

Walking down the middle of the street at night in a high crime area justified a patdown. State v. Hall, 2020-Ohio-2937, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1913 (5th Dist. May 15, 2020).* Replica of Glover: State v. Anglin, 2020-Ohio-2907, 2020 Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH5: Walking down the middle of the street at night in a high crime area justified a patdown

OR: Common authority, not ownership, confers actual authority to consent

“It is common authority, not legal ownership, that confers actual authority to consent to a search. … In this case, the evidence was sufficient for the court to find that A shared common authority with defendant over the bedroom and … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on OR: Common authority, not ownership, confers actual authority to consent

NY3: Even if CSLI was wrongly obtained, it was harmless error

Assuming, without deciding, that obtaining defendant’s CSLI in a knife attack case was unreasonable, it was harmless error on this record. Plenty of other evidence connected him. People v. Perez, 2020 NY Slip Op 02684, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on NY3: Even if CSLI was wrongly obtained, it was harmless error

N.D.Ohio: Private party, here the owner, can be enlisted to help in computer search

Both the Fourth Amendment and Ohio law permitted law enforcement to seek private assistance in executing a search warrant, here of a computer, and the search was conducted by the company that owned the computer. United States v. Powell, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Private party, here the owner, can be enlisted to help in computer search

E.D.Mich.: Innocent explanations for pole camera evidence to get SW didn’t make a Franks challenge because there still was PC

Defendant’s innocent explanations for what pole camera videos showed that were not in the affidavit for search warrant do not amount to a Franks challenge. There still was probable cause. United States v. Joye, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66463 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Pole cameras, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Innocent explanations for pole camera evidence to get SW didn’t make a Franks challenge because there still was PC

D.N.J.: There were material misrepresentations in the affidavit for a vehicle SW, but they are mooted by the automobile exception

The validity of the search warrant for defendant’s car was irrelevant where the automobile exception applied. Therefore, defendant’s Franks challenge is moot despite the fact there were material misrepresentations in the affidavit because the officers were trying to keep a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.N.J.: There were material misrepresentations in the affidavit for a vehicle SW, but they are mooted by the automobile exception

E.D.Ky.: Ambiguities in affidavit for SW not a Franks violation

Alleged ambiguities in the affidavit for the search warrant didn’t show a Franks violation where there clearly was probable cause. United States v. Jenkins, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69247 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 21, 2020). A 911 call from a cell … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Ambiguities in affidavit for SW not a Franks violation

FL2: Search incident of backpack for being in park after hours invalid

Defendant was stopped for sitting in a park with his bicycle after hours, a violation of a county ordinance. The search incident of his backpack for this offense violated the Florida Constitution. Booker v. State, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 5718 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on FL2: Search incident of backpack for being in park after hours invalid

N.D.Ind.: Merely saying in a motion to suppress def was arrested without probable cause doesn’t state grounds

Defendant does not offer further context or analysis. Based upon his failure to fully address this issue, the Defendant’s argument regarding an alleged illegal search and seizure is denied without prejudice. See United States v. Collins, 796 F.3d 829, 836 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Merely saying in a motion to suppress def was arrested without probable cause doesn’t state grounds

S.D.Fla.: SW for apt and seizure of computers and cell phones includes power to search them later

A search warrant to search an apartment and seize computers and cell phones includes the power to search them later. United States v. Quinonez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55789 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 30, 2020). The officer’s statement that the CI’s … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: SW for apt and seizure of computers and cell phones includes power to search them later

W.D.Ky.: Franks challenge fails because of complete lack of materiality

Moreover, Perkins did not — and cannot — make a preliminary showing that any alleged ‘false statement or material omission [was] necessary to the probable cause finding in the affidavit.’ If the Court were to strike every contested statement from … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Franks challenge fails because of complete lack of materiality

E.D.Wis.: Franks hearing denied; even if what def says is true, PC not undermined

Defendant makes a Franks challenge to events recounted from one day in the time line, which the court finds not material to the ultimate showing of probable cause. Therefore, there was an insufficient preliminary showing for a hearing. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Franks hearing denied; even if what def says is true, PC not undermined