Category Archives: Franks doctrine

D.Kan.: Preliminary hearing moots claim of lack of PC for arrest

If an arrest lacks probable cause, the preliminary hearing can moot that. Taylor v. Szewc, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57791 (D. Kan. Mar. 29, 2024). Omitted information about the CI doesn’t support this Franks challenge. United States v. Williams, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Mootness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Preliminary hearing moots claim of lack of PC for arrest

CA4: Tracking order using cell site simulator with PC was reasonable

The use of a cell site simulator to track defendant’s phone was conducted by a tracking order issued under state law with probable cause. Tracking him led the police to his place, and then a search warrant issued for the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site simulators, Franks doctrine, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA4: Tracking order using cell site simulator with PC was reasonable

D.N.M.: Even if def’s DNA was not obtained by consent, inevitable discovery applies

Even if defendant’s DNA was obtained by coercion, inevitable discovery applies. United States v. Montoya, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77952 (D.N.M. Apr. 29, 2024).* A description of video of a shooting incident that identifies defendant, on independent review, was not … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Even if def’s DNA was not obtained by consent, inevitable discovery applies

D.Me.: Alleged statutory violation doesn’t warrant exclusionary rule

In a search of medical records, records were seized in excess of the scope of a prior Patient Records Order for information other than patient drug abuse, but that did not warrant suppression here because the Fourth Amendment was not … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Me.: Alleged statutory violation doesn’t warrant exclusionary rule

CA6: Asking def before a patdown during arrest what he had on him wasn’t barred by Miranda

Asking defendant before a patdown during arrest what he had on him wasn’t barred by Miranda. United States v. Lester, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 9162 (6th Cir. Apr. 16, 2024). The evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion defendant consented to … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Privileges, Protective sweep, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA6: Asking def before a patdown during arrest what he had on him wasn’t barred by Miranda

D.N.M.: Three Franks challenges, one successful

Defendant succeeds in his Franks challenge. After a hearing, it was more likely than not that there was a false statement at least recklessly made, and it was material: “For these reasons, the Court finds that the false statement included … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Three Franks challenges, one successful

CA7: No IAC in failure to more aggressively pursue Franks challenge

Defense counsel acted reasonably in how he pursued defendant’s suppression motion founded on Franks in not arguing more stringently for bad faith. Here, defendant was charged in state court with child pornography. His motion to suppress the search was granted. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA7: No IAC in failure to more aggressively pursue Franks challenge

N.D.Ohio: Heroin and three guns in plain view was exigency for entry with child alone inside

Police knowing that defendant’s 12-year-old son was in the house alone with a significant quantity of heroin and three firearms all in plain view was exigency for entry. There also previous complaints to Family Services. United States v. Woodard, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Heroin and three guns in plain view was exigency for entry with child alone inside

CA9: Officer stopping to check on an already stopped motorcycle wasn’t a seizure

Defendant’s motorcycle was already stopped on the side of the road. The officer pulling up to check on him wasn’t a seizure. United States v. Melgoza, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 8384 (9th Cir. Apr. 8, 2024). FISA warrants have a … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Officer stopping to check on an already stopped motorcycle wasn’t a seizure

OH5: A replevin action can’t be used to suppress evidence seized by SW

A replevin action can’t be used to suppress evidence seized by search warrant. Glass v. Del. Cty. Sheriff’s Office, 2024-Ohio-1301, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 1235 (5th Dist. Apr. 4, 2024). Defendant fails his Franks burden, and the warrant wasn’t stale. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Independent source, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH5: A replevin action can’t be used to suppress evidence seized by SW

CA8: Motel operator could consent to search for drugs he found cleaning room, and defendant didn’t even know

Defendant rented a hotel room for two nights. He was warned no illegal conduct. After the first night, the motel operator entered to clean the room. The mattress had been moved, so the operator lifted it to move it back … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Motel operator could consent to search for drugs he found cleaning room, and defendant didn’t even know

CA10: Def’s possession of a gun six days ago can add to RS now

In the reasonable suspicion calculus, the fact defendant had a gun six days earlier can be a factor in reasonable suspicion now. United States v. Minners, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7734 (10th Cir. Apr. 2, 2024). Plaintiffs were loaded on … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s possession of a gun six days ago can add to RS now

TX: Refusal to consent can’t be part of RS

“The court of appeals should not have considered Appellant’s lawful refusal to consent to the search of his truck when determining if the facts of this case gave rise to reasonable suspicion. Instead, the court of appeals should have considered … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX: Refusal to consent can’t be part of RS

CA3: Inference of nexus to property in drug cases

Inference of nexus to property drug cases in CA3: “[T]he Third Circuit has established a test for district courts to assess the reasonableness of such an inference—the so-called Burton standard. The ‘application of this inference is based on evidence supporting … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on CA3: Inference of nexus to property in drug cases

E.D.N.Y.: Public employee labor union contract can consent to drug testing of members

“Despite Fourth Amendment implications, ‘a public employee union acting as the exclusive bargaining agent may consent to drug testing on behalf of the employees it represents.’” (quoting Bolden v. SEPTA, 953 F.2d 807, 828 (3d Cir. 1991). Dolginko v. Long … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, DNA, Franks doctrine, Private search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Public employee labor union contract can consent to drug testing of members

TN: Owner of cell phone doesn’t need to be known for SW for it

Search warrants are directed at things and information, and the fact officers didn’t know the owner of the cell phone didn’t mean the warrant was invalid. The phone revealed internet searches about a homicide before it was public knowledge. State … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on TN: Owner of cell phone doesn’t need to be known for SW for it

E.D.N.Y.: Def gets Franks but govt also gets to show justification for protective sweep

There were mistakes in the affidavit that at least gets defendant a Franks hearing. The government, however, will get to provide more information about the justification for a protective sweep which is not confined to the four corners. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def gets Franks but govt also gets to show justification for protective sweep

CA10: 68 days of pole camera surveillance in disability fraud case was reasonable

Suspecting VA benefits fraud, the VA OIG surveilled defendant for months and then installed a remote controlled and motion activated pole camera on top of a school across the street. They had 15 hours of video for 68 days, and … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Pole cameras, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: 68 days of pole camera surveillance in disability fraud case was reasonable

D.N.M.: No GFE for a Franks violation

Defendant met his Franks burden and showed a false statement in the affidavit for search warrant that was material to the probable cause finding. The statement was from the chief to the affiant. Finally, there is no good faith exception … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.M.: No GFE for a Franks violation

OH3: Parole search authority is statutory, not coerced consent

The parole search statute governs parole searches. It is not a matter of coerced consent. State v. Harrison, 2024-Ohio-884, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 816 (3d Dist. Mar. 11, 2024). Civil Franks violation: “The omission of the full timeline is material … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH3: Parole search authority is statutory, not coerced consent