Category Archives: Reasonable expectation of privacy

CA6: Trash pulls not unreasonable despite local ordinance that only trash collectors permitted in trash

Trash pulls by police are not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, notwithstanding a local ordinance that limits trash collectors to rummaging in trash. United States v. Mathis, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 10275 (6th Cir. Mar. 30, 2020). Defendant’s probation search … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: Trash pulls not unreasonable despite local ordinance that only trash collectors permitted in trash

CA11: No REP in a police interview room where def was recorded confessing to his wife

There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in a police interview room where defendant was recorded confessing to his wife. Lundberg v. Secretary, Fla. Dep’t of Correction, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 9953 (11th Cir. Mar. 31, 2020). Police received a … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA11: No REP in a police interview room where def was recorded confessing to his wife

N.D.Ill.: Two police officers whose conversation was accidentally transmitted over radio had no REP in them

Plaintiffs were police officers who had what they thought was a private conversation, but, due to a radio malfunction, it was transmitted on a channel they didn’t even use and was recorded. The conversation led to their termination. The defendants … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Two police officers whose conversation was accidentally transmitted over radio had no REP in them

W.D.Wash.: Specialized P2P software for a CP search doesn’t otherwise create a REP issue that doesn’t exist

The government’s use of specialized software to search peer-to-peer files didn’t create a reasonable expectation of privacy claim. “RoundUp, software with certain technological modifications to a public, open-source P2P network sharing client, is designed to access public files that individuals … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Specialized P2P software for a CP search doesn’t otherwise create a REP issue that doesn’t exist

D.Nev.: No REP in prescription drug database from police inspection

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the Nevada prescription drug database because he willingly provided the information to the doctor and the pharmacist, and the police need cause to get access. United States v. Motley, 2020 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.Nev.: No REP in prescription drug database from police inspection

E.D.Wis.: No REP child porn sent by Facebook Messenger won’t be retransmitted to police by Facebook

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in child pornography uploaded to Facebook Messenger. Even treating it as email (Warshak), the email provider can turn child pornography over to law enforcement when it is transmitted. Then a further search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Social media warrants, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: No REP child porn sent by Facebook Messenger won’t be retransmitted to police by Facebook

E.D.Ky.: Inviting in a CI unknowingly wearing an audio-visual recording device violates no REP

Inviting in a CI unknowingly wearing an audio-visual recording device violates no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Hight, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30546 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 24, 2020):

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Inviting in a CI unknowingly wearing an audio-visual recording device violates no REP

M.D.Tenn.: Single trash pull at a duplex with one trash container was still PC and nexus

A single trash pull that produced some evidence of limited possession at a duplex with one trash container was still probable cause with nexus to defendant. United States v. Hogan, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30039 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 21, 2020). … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Single trash pull at a duplex with one trash container was still PC and nexus

N.D.Cal.: No 4A REP in VA medical records

There is no Fourth Amendment reasonable expectation of privacy in VA medical records, vis-a-vis another government agency. United States v. Grant, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27270 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2020):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: No 4A REP in VA medical records

IA: Trash container on the alley not on his property; no REP

A trash seizure [remember those?] was of trash on an alley awaiting pick up. There was no entry on the curtilage or his reasonable expectation of privacy. State v. Wright, 2020 Iowa App. LEXIS 151 (Feb. 5, 2020). The officer’s … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on IA: Trash container on the alley not on his property; no REP

OR: Car owner had no REP from GPS installed by his company before he got the car from them

Plaintiff worked for Toyota Motor Credit and Toyota Financial Services. When he severed his employment with them, he was allowed to keep the vehicle he used for them. Unbeknownst to him, Toyota Financial Services had a GPS device on the … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OR: Car owner had no REP from GPS installed by his company before he got the car from them

OH6: Checking DMV records involves no 4A intrustion

“[T]he law is clear that a police officer’s check of a person’s Bureau of Motor Vehicles records does not implicate Fourth Amendment rights, as it does not constitute an invasion as it involves no intrusion.” State v. Price, 2020-Ohio-220, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH6: Checking DMV records involves no 4A intrustion

OH11: “Hand swabs” in SW for person fairly includes fingernail scrapings; no REP in clothing removed at ER by nurses

Defendant was brought to a hospital for alleged injuries. He was exceedingly drunk for a juvenile and covered in blood. He was cleaned up at the ER and no injuries found. The nurses there took his clothes. Police later seized … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH11: “Hand swabs” in SW for person fairly includes fingernail scrapings; no REP in clothing removed at ER by nurses

D.Mont.: With court ordered pinging of cell phone, govt violated no REP in following the pings

Once officers had a warrant authorizing capturing defendant’s cell phone pings back even in 2015, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his movements in public when they were following him based on the result of the pings. Therefore, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Mont.: With court ordered pinging of cell phone, govt violated no REP in following the pings

CA6: Def doesn’t show officer delayed stop for drug dog; whole encounter was 5-10 minutes

Defendant argued that the officer delayed the process of issuing a traffic citation by extraneous questioning just to get a dog sniff in within the period before the traffic citation could be completed. Still, the entire process reasonably took ten … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: Def doesn’t show officer delayed stop for drug dog; whole encounter was 5-10 minutes

W.D.Mo.: FedEx’s taking a package off its conveyor belt for a dog sniff wasn’t a seizure that interfered with def’s possessory interest

“[T]he police did not ‘seize’ the package until after the dog alerted to the presence of drugs. It was not a seizure to remove the package from the FedEx conveyor belt, carry it 200 feet to the back of the … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: FedEx’s taking a package off its conveyor belt for a dog sniff wasn’t a seizure that interfered with def’s possessory interest

CA5: Even assuming 4A violation, ptf doesn’t show it was clearly established

“In short, we decline to opine on whether Campbell’s actions amount to a [Fourth Amendment] violation. Robles failed to meet his burden to show that such a violation was clearly established, particularly when dealing with an underlying violent crime. Accordingly, … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA5: Even assuming 4A violation, ptf doesn’t show it was clearly established

N.D.Ill.: Removing drugs from a package with an already issued anticipatory warrant and not telling court wasn’t material to PC

There was no material falsity in the affidavit for the search warrant which mentioned 58 prior international shipments to defendant’s place. Specifically, the drugs were removed from the package for the anticipatory warrant and replaced with fake stuff after the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Removing drugs from a package with an already issued anticipatory warrant and not telling court wasn’t material to PC

TX1: Def lost REP in his mislaid phone that somebody found and opened to try and discern the owner to return it

Defendant mislaid his cell phone, and he didn’t abandon it. Nevertheless, it was available for anyone to pick up and turn in to somebody to help find him. Moreover, it wasn’t passcode protected, and it was reasonable for someone to … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX1: Def lost REP in his mislaid phone that somebody found and opened to try and discern the owner to return it

E.D.Pa.: Use of a key fob to identify defendant’s vehicle is not a search; it’s commonly available technology under Kyllo

Use of a key fob to identify defendant’ vehicle is not a search invading a reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Burgess, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206776 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2019):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Use of a key fob to identify defendant’s vehicle is not a search; it’s commonly available technology under Kyllo