Category Archives: Social media warrants

DC: Facebook can’t assert 1A or 4A privacy of posts under SCA

Facebook and the District of Columbia are litigating a subpoena from the D.C. A.G. over alleged Covid misinformation. There is no expectation of privacy in what is posted on Facebook. “May” divulge in the Store Communications Act is an excuse … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Social media warrants, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on DC: Facebook can’t assert 1A or 4A privacy of posts under SCA

D.Md.: Instagram SW was valid by GFE despite weak PC, but it was excessively searched

“The Instagram Motion [to suppress] will be granted in part. Although the probable cause to search Rivers’ Instagram account was weak, the Leon good faith exception applies and the evidence will therefore not be suppressed on the basis of a … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Excessive force, Scope of search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Md.: Instagram SW was valid by GFE despite weak PC, but it was excessively searched

NJ: SW for realtime updates from a Facebook account was a virtual wiretap that had to comply with state wiretap law

The state had a warrant for updates every 15 minutes of two Facebook accounts. That was virtually a wiretap, and the state wiretapping law applies. Facebook, Inc. v. State, 2023 N.J. LEXIS 700 (June 29, 2023). From the syllabus:

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on NJ: SW for realtime updates from a Facebook account was a virtual wiretap that had to comply with state wiretap law

AF: Telling wife in jail call to delete a social media account AFOSI was looking to search was obstruction

While defendant was in pretrial confinement, he called his wife and instructed her to delete a social media account that the government was intending to search. This led to his obstruction charge. The call was monitored by the jail. United … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Social media warrants, Staleness | Comments Off on AF: Telling wife in jail call to delete a social media account AFOSI was looking to search was obstruction

E.D.Cal.: Contraband cell phone in prison can be wiretapped outside of Title III

Because there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a prison or in a cell phone in prison, a contraband cell phone can be wiretapped without a Title III warrant. United States v. Bash, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180680 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Contraband cell phone in prison can be wiretapped outside of Title III

D.D.C.: No REP in Facebook posting tracking information

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the “tracking information” of underlying data in one’s social media accounts or time and location information of postings. Moreover, Facebook post tracking information is more voluntary and not fulltime tracking like CSLI … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.D.C.: No REP in Facebook posting tracking information

N.D.Ga.: Former AUSA as USMJ not automatically recused from hearing motion to suppress

The USMJ hearing the motion to suppress in this case was earlier an AUSA in the office prosecuting it. She had nothing to do with this case, so recusal is not required. (“Neutral and detached” never mentioned.) United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion, Social media warrants | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Former AUSA as USMJ not automatically recused from hearing motion to suppress

E.D.Va.: Drug paraphernalia was in plain view before flashlight put through window

Drug paraphernalia seen from outside the vehicle before sticking a flashlight in the window was a valid plain view. United States v. Johnson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149401 (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2022).* There was probable cause for plaintiff’s prosecution, … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Drug paraphernalia was in plain view before flashlight put through window

W.D.Mo.: SW for the entirety of def’s Instagram account was not a general search

The warrant for the entirety of defendant’s Instagram account was not a general search. United States v. Smith, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147892 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 18, 2022). Seeing a handgun protruding from defendant’ waistband as he walked down the … Continue reading →

Posted in General warrant, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Social media warrants | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: SW for the entirety of def’s Instagram account was not a general search

D.Md.: Cell phone dump on a SW wasn’t shown to be overbroad

A cell phone dump after a search warrant wasn’t necessarily overbroad, and didn’t show it. “More particularity was impractical, and was not required.” United States v. Nelson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125994 (D. Md. July 15, 2022). Officers who used … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Overbreadth, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Md.: Cell phone dump on a SW wasn’t shown to be overbroad

W.D.Wis.: No REP in one’s Facebook posts, even when accessed by a “ghost” account

A law enforcement officer’s creation of a ghost Facebook account to access defendant’s private pages violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Randall, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122615 (W.D. Wis. July 12, 2022), and more elaborate than I … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Social media warrants | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: No REP in one’s Facebook posts, even when accessed by a “ghost” account

D.Md.: Facebook subject to search because of interactions there with co-conspirator

Defendant’s Facebook page was subject to being searched because there were interactions on it with a coconspirator, and that showed probable cause. United States v. Daprato, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78626 (D.Md. May 2, 2022).* “Frey’s motion to suppress evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Md.: Facebook subject to search because of interactions there with co-conspirator

D.Mont.: Burden on def to show extent of privacy interest in Instagram account

Defendant had the burden to show the extent of his privacy interest in his Instagram account. Were the parts to be evidence obtained from the private or public parts? He doesn’t show. The Terms of Service would limit it in … Continue reading →

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Burden on def to show extent of privacy interest in Instagram account

Bloomberg: Facebook Data Release to Cops Evades 4A Limits Deep Dive

Bloomberg: Facebook Data Release to Cops Evades Fourth Amendment Limits Deep Dive by Jake Holland (“A Ninth Circuit ruling that allows tech companies to turn over an individual’s online account data to law enforcement for preservation without violating the Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on Bloomberg: Facebook Data Release to Cops Evades 4A Limits Deep Dive

NJ: Facebook searches require SWs, not intercept orders

A communication data warrant requires probable cause. Facebook’s data in hand is not “intercepted” for wiretapping purposes. Facebook, Inc. v. State, 2022 N.J. Super. LEXIS 40 (Apr. 4, 2022):

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on NJ: Facebook searches require SWs, not intercept orders

DC: Facebook has no right to a SW instead of subpoena for subscriber information on an account

A civil investigative subpoena to Facebook for information about posters of Covid misinformation was not unreasonable. n.3: “Meta suggests that the Fourth Amendment requires the District to obtain a search warrant to get this information. … One sufficient response is … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Social media warrants | Comments Off on DC: Facebook has no right to a SW instead of subpoena for subscriber information on an account

D.Kan.: No REP in Twitter account it closed for violation of TOS for child porn

Twitter deactivated defendant’s account for violation of its terms of service and reported him to NCMEC. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the files Twitter had preserved on him. “The Court finds under the circumstances of the case … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Social media warrants, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Kan.: No REP in Twitter account it closed for violation of TOS for child porn

MA: No REP in privacy settings on social media when def let undercover officer in

An officer sending defendant a SnapChat “friend” request which defendant accepted created no reasonable expectation of privacy in his SnapChat account. Thereafter, defendant posted a video of him with a firearm, and police looked for him and arrested him for … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Social media warrants | Comments Off on MA: No REP in privacy settings on social media when def let undercover officer in

D.Nev.: Def’s Facebook posts he was selling fake IDs gave PC to search it

An officer found defendant selling fake IDs via Facebook. “The Facebook Warrant contained posts from this account indicating that the account-operator was selling fake IDs, including by specifying that the IDs could help people avoid warrants, fines, and jail time. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Social media warrants, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def’s Facebook posts he was selling fake IDs gave PC to search it

CA11: FBI’s negligence in taking six months to search def’s truck and computers did not require suppression

“Bruce Nicholson, an Alabama man convicted of federal child sex crimes and sentenced to life in prison, challenges his conviction on direct appeal. The main question in this criminal appeal is, as it often is, whether a criminal should ‘go … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay, Social media warrants | Comments Off on CA11: FBI’s negligence in taking six months to search def’s truck and computers did not require suppression