CA1: Seizure of a cell phone to get a SW was proper; frisk of jacket for weapon was, too

Officers suspected defendant of sex trafficking, and Detroit PD called the Portland ME PD to report he was there, likely with a young girl. He was known to them as a prior sex trafficker. They found him at a hotel and went to the room. After 90 seconds, the door was opened, and officers could smell marijuana. He was briefly questioned, issued a summons for the marijuana, and he was told he could go. They validly frisked his jacket before he left finding a large quantity of money by plain feel, which they seized. They held on to his cell phones because of reasonable suspicion of sex trafficking, and they applied for search warrants for the phones. The searches were all valid. The frisk because of the chance of a weapon; the cell phones with probable cause. United States v. Henry, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11000 (1st Cir. June 17, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA1: Seizure of a cell phone to get a SW was proper; frisk of jacket for weapon was, too

W.D.N.Y.: When def saw police at door, he stepped back, and that justified their coming in to arrest him on a warrant

Defendant’s arrest with a warrant inside his apartment was valid, and the constitution didn’t required he be pulled outside to arrest. He stepped back when he saw the officers and they came in and arrested him. A limited protective sweep was valid. This was characterized as a “heat of the moment” decision because of his stepping back, and it was reasonable. United States v. Nicholson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78727 (W.D.N.Y. June 15, 2016), adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94720 (W.D.N.Y. July 20, 2016)..

A postal inspector’s first-hand observations along with a detective’s statement that he recognized defendant’s name from other drug-related investigations was reasonable suspicion to detain a package addressed to defendant. United States v. Kent, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10756 (4th Cir. June 14, 2016).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: When def saw police at door, he stepped back, and that justified their coming in to arrest him on a warrant

WA: FST is a seizure, but it is not a search under Fourth Amendment

Field sobriety test is a seizure, but it is not a search under Fourth Amendment or the more inclusive state constitution. State v. Mecham, 2016 Wash. LEXIS 695 (June 16, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Search, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: FST is a seizure, but it is not a search under Fourth Amendment

TX1: Cell phone was abandoned on roof of abandoned getaway car

The getaway car for a robbery was left outside the scene when the occupants got out of the car to shoot but scattered after gunfire. Defendant’s cell phone was left on the roof of the car. This was an abandonment of the phone. Edwards v. State, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 6374 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) June 16, 2016) (concurring).

The search of defendant’s house was valid under apparent authority of the co-occupant to consent, so defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the search. Painter v. Ballard, 2016 W. Va. LEXIS 526 (June 15, 2016) (mem.).*

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX1: Cell phone was abandoned on roof of abandoned getaway car

OH9: Potential suicide call justified entry; “ironclad proof” not required

A call about a potential suicide was justification for police entry into the house. They don’t need “ironclad proof” that a suicide might happen, just a reasonable belief. State v. Linder, 2016-Ohio-3435, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2291 (9th Dist. June 15, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH9: Potential suicide call justified entry; “ironclad proof” not required

IA: Officer violated Rodriguez by shifting from speeding to drugs and asking for consent which was refused

Defendant was stopped for speeding and seemed nervous. The DL was suspended. A request for consent was made and rejected. The officer completed the paperwork for the traffic stop in six minutes but spent ten minutes attempting to elicit admissions about drugs. The state’s argument about arranging for another driver fails because that didn’t happen until after the drug dog arrived. State v. Carroll, 2016 Iowa App. LEXIS 629 (June 15, 2016).

The officer did not violate defendant’s curtilage to come onto his porch to talk about him being involved in a hit and run and finding him DUI. Their interaction was consensual. State v. White, 2016 Iowa App. LEXIS 594 (June 15, 2016).*

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Officer violated Rodriguez by shifting from speeding to drugs and asking for consent which was refused

N.D.Ga.: Citing wrong U.S.C. section doesn’t undermine PC if any crime is shown

Citation to the wrong U.S. Code section in a search warrant affidavit doesn’t undermine the probable cause if one can discern that some federal crime has occurred. The affidavit here described mass sale of cell phone apps in violation of copyright. The investigation led to an IP address at defendant’s house and that was nexus. United States v. Blocker, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77280 (N.D.Ga. Feb. 29, 2016).*

The district court’s findings that defendant flashed a gun before hiding it are “virtually unreviewable on appeal” and support the seizure. United States v. Scott, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10635 (8th Cir. June 13, 2016).*

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Citing wrong U.S.C. section doesn’t undermine PC if any crime is shown

CA10: State court’s harmlessness determination was binding under Stone v. Powell

Defendant raised the legality of a search in the trial court, but not everything that was seized. The court of criminal appeals considered the remainder and found it harmless error. On habeas, defendant had a full and fair opportunity to raise the issues in state court, and they couldn’t be determined in habeas under Stone v. Powell. Harmon v. McCollum, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10868 (10th Cir. June 14, 2016).

Defendant’s vehicle was stopped because of a missing side mirror and flapping trim. Then defendant was found driving on a suspended DL. Then the officer got out a drug dog that alerted. The stop was reasonable through all of that. State v. Kremer, 2016-Ohio-3399, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2261 (12th Dist. June 13, 2016).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: State court’s harmlessness determination was binding under Stone v. Powell

OH9: Handing over cell phone to police and giving password is consent to search

Defendant sent a video of himself with a child to a friend who showed it to the police. The police came to his house and asked about the video, and he admitted making it, and then he turned over his cell phone with the password. This was all by consent. Giving up the password to the phone was implicit consent. State v. Speelman, 2016-Ohio-3409, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2272 (5th Dist. June 9, 2016).

Miranda argument should have been included in the motion to suppress the search of his car due eight months ago, so it is untimely. United States v. Qazi, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77168 (D.Nev. March 14, 2016).*

Posted in Cell phones, Consent | Comments Off on OH9: Handing over cell phone to police and giving password is consent to search

D.Kan.: Plain view doesn’t apply to a cell phone where the officers had to turn it on to make their view

Plain view doesn’t apply to a cell phone where the officers had to turn it on to make their view. United States v. Ramirez, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190665 (D.Kan. March 26, 2013):
Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Plain view doesn’t apply to a cell phone where the officers had to turn it on to make their view

ID: A party doesn’t have to cite specific case law to preserve its Fourth Amendment argument if it otherwise says the right words

The state doesn’t have to cite specific case law to preserve its argument; just make the argument. Here, it was that defendant was stopped for wandering on the road and that produced no DL and that he was driving a rental car without permission of the rental company because he wasn’t an authorized driver. Even if the detention amounted to a de facto arrest, it was justified by the lack of a DL. Suppression reversed. State v. Garcia-Rodriguez, 2016 Ida. App. LEXIS 60 (June 9, 2016).

Three was probable cause to stop defendant’s car for over tinting. Defendant’s Franks violation fails when counsel admits that the information isn’t false at the suppression hearing. United States v. Pierre, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10705 (11th Cir. June 14, 2016).*

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ID: A party doesn’t have to cite specific case law to preserve its Fourth Amendment argument if it otherwise says the right words

GAO: Face Recognition Technology: FBI Should Better Ensure Privacy and Accuracy

GAO: Face Recognition Technology: FBI Should Better Ensure Privacy and Accuracy:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on GAO: Face Recognition Technology: FBI Should Better Ensure Privacy and Accuracy

MI: No RS required for administrative SW for rental unit inspections once every 3 years

“Appellant city challenges the district court’s denial of its application for an administrative search warrant to conduct a rental-housing inspection [where inspections are only done every three years], arguing that the district court erred in determining that individualized suspicion of a code violation is required. Because we are not left with a “clear and strong conviction” that there is a principled basis for interpreting article I, section 10, of the Minnesota Constitution to provide greater protection than the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution in this context, we reverse and remand.” In re An Admin. Search Warrant v. Wiebesick, 2016 Minn. App. LEXIS 44 (June 13, 2016).

Posted in Administrative search, State constitution | Comments Off on MI: No RS required for administrative SW for rental unit inspections once every 3 years

D.R.I.: Protective sweep of car justified by def being, inter alia, in a violent biker gang and having a 19 pg criminal history

Protective sweep of car was justified because defendant was a member of a violent biker gang, nervousness, 19-page criminal history, volunteering he hadn’t been drinking when not asked, among other things. United States v. Severns, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76103 (D.R.I. June 9, 2016)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Protective sweep of car justified by def being, inter alia, in a violent biker gang and having a 19 pg criminal history

Dashcam and bodycam undermine reasonable suspicion in two cases

These two make one wonder how many times officers have just fabricated reasonable suspicion and courts have bought it:

The dashcam video supports the defendant’s argument that he was stopped without reasonable suspicion of driving with lights off when they should have been on. The stop for following too close is also unsupported. The highway was nearly empty. Suppressed. United States v. Dominguez-Fernand, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76368 (S.D.Ind. June 13, 2016).

The bodycam videos conflict with the officers’ testimony and show no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s patdown. Suppressed. United States v. Adkinson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75638 (E.D.Va. June 8, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Dashcam and bodycam undermine reasonable suspicion in two cases

W.D.N.Y.: CI was a known regular and brought with the affidavit for SW; issuing magistrate could question

“Here, probable cause existed for the Niagara Falls City Court judge to issue the search warrant for Walnut Avenue. Law enforcement agents presented information through their affidavit that included the confidential informant’s reliability and the results of two controlled purchases. … Additionally, the agents brought the confidential informant with them when presenting the search warrant application. The judge already knew from prior interactions that the confidential informant was reliable. The judge also would have been able to assess the confidential informant’s credibility face-to-face.” United States v. Hayes, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76627 (W.D.N.Y. June 13, 2016).

Considering the stringent standard for reconsideration motions, defendant’s complaints about the credibility determinations on the hearing on his motion to suppress aren’t enough. There was no error of law pointed out. United States v. Wesselhoft, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75078 (D.V.I. June 9, 2016).*

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: CI was a known regular and brought with the affidavit for SW; issuing magistrate could question

VT: Video recording of def’s telephone conversation with defense counsel required suppression of breath test

Defendant was in the room with the breath testing machine, and his telephone conversation with his lawyer was recorded. Recording was accidental, but defendant correctly believed that it was. This requires suppression of the breath test because his consultation with defense counsel wasn’t unfettered. State v. Gagne, 2016 VT 68, 2016 Vt. LEXIS 64 (June 10, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on VT: Video recording of def’s telephone conversation with defense counsel required suppression of breath test

WaPo: ‘The Volokh Conspiracy’ Blog: Short Circuit: A roundup of recent federal court decisions

WaPo: ‘The Volokh Conspiracy’ Blog: Short Circuit: A roundup of recent federal court decisions by Eugene Volokh:

Is ‘the rule of law’ just an empty phrase trotted out when convenient? Hardly, argues Evan Bernick of the Center for Judicial Engagement, but thanks to the federal judiciary’s failure to uphold the rule of law, it’s in danger of becoming one.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Volokh Conspiracy’ Blog: Short Circuit: A roundup of recent federal court decisions

MA: Cell phone SW was issued without PC, but it was harmless error in light of DNA

Massachusetts requires a warrant for CSLI after a certain date, and retroactivity depends on whether the issue was raised at trial. Here, the issue hadn’t been raised at trial from a 2011 crime although the case was on direct review at the time of the CSLI decision. As an apparent alternative basis, the DNA evidence in the case puts defendant with the victim, and the CSLI is minor. “In these circumstances, it cannot be said that the defendant was unfairly prejudiced by admission of the CSLI evidence. No substantial likelihood of a miscarriage of justice occurred.” As to defendant’s cell phone search warrant, it was issued without probable cause to believe that anything useful would be found, and it should not have been granted. Again, however, it is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt: the DA used only two text messages to refresh a witness’s memory. Commonwealth v. Broom, 2016 Mass. LEXIS 372 (June 13, 2016).

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information | Comments Off on MA: Cell phone SW was issued without PC, but it was harmless error in light of DNA

D.S.D.: No suppression for any alleged violation of Vienna Convention for dual U.S.-Canadian citizen

Defendant was indicted for selling fellatio from his 17 year old cousin and a 15 year old at the 2014 Sturgis motorcycle rally. There was probable cause for his arrest. Any alleged violation of the Vienna Convention on Consular Rights because of defendant’s dual U.S.-Canadian citizenship doesn’t warrant suppression. United States v. Thymaras, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75789 (D.S.D. June 10, 2016).

Defendant’s search of the person and her belongings on a Greyhound bus in Albuquerque by a drug interdiction team was by consent. “In sum, the Court concludes that Defendant’s conduct in nodding, stepping into the aisle, and raising her arms constituted an unequivocal show of assent to a pat-down search. Considering the totality of the circumstances, the Court additionally determines that Defendant’s consent was freely and intelligently given without implied or express duress or coercion.” United States v. Valdez-Perea, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191455 (D.N.M. May 21, 2012).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on D.S.D.: No suppression for any alleged violation of Vienna Convention for dual U.S.-Canadian citizen