E.D.Mich.: Govt assertion house was abandoned wasn’t reasonable; yard kept, trash bin out front, van in driveway

The officers weren’t reasonable in their conclusion that the house they searched was abandoned. There was no property record check and the yard was “reasonably kept” with a trash bin out for collection, bars on the windows, and a white van in the driveway. United States v. Spence, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31034 (E.D. Mich. March 6, 2017) (see Treatise § 19.07):
Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Govt assertion house was abandoned wasn’t reasonable; yard kept, trash bin out front, van in driveway

E.D.Pa.: Def was “stopped” when he was ordered to turn around at gunpoint; RS wasn’t dispelled just by minor discrepancies in clothing, skin tone, and weight

“[T]here was a clear show of authority when Powell approached Bey with his gun drawn and ordered him to turn around. This command would have conveyed to a reasonable person that he was being ordered to restrict his movement. Bey submitted to that show of authority when he immediately complied with Powell’s command to turn around and raise his hands.” Slight discrepancies in the clothing, skin tone, and weight description were not enough to render the stop invalid. Reasonable suspicion was not readily dispelled after the stop, either. United States v. Bey, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30999 (E.D. Pa. March 6, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Def was “stopped” when he was ordered to turn around at gunpoint; RS wasn’t dispelled just by minor discrepancies in clothing, skin tone, and weight

AZ: Non-consensual blood draw DUI provision is unconstitutional as applied, but the Davis GFE applies

Non-consensual blood draw DUI provision is unconstitutional as applied, but the Davis good faith exception applies here. Defendant was airlifted to a Nevada hospital for the blood draw. The trial court didn’t make findings on whether Nevada or Arizona law should apply to the blood draw, and the case is remanded for findings on that. State v. Havatone, 2015 Ariz. LEXIS 373 (March 9, 2017) (see Treatise § 9.03 on choice of law considerations under the exclusionary rule).

Defendant was a car transporter with six vehicles stopped for crossing the center line after a ice and snow storm when there was still some ice on the road. The officer asked for consent to search the vehicles on the trailer, and defendant freely consented according to the findings of the trial court. The state conceded he had standing in the cars as a bailee. The stop took a little long, but it was a stop of a regulated truck with log books and bills of lading, and the stop was not unreasonably extended. His argumentativeness contributed to reasonable suspicion. Pokatilov v. State, 2017 Ark. App. 150, 2017 Ark. App. LEXIS 163 (March 8, 2017) (6-3) (see Treatise § 4.10 n.2).

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AZ: Non-consensual blood draw DUI provision is unconstitutional as applied, but the Davis GFE applies

CA11: Ptf stated enough to get over Heck bar; DC erred in dismissing with insufficient findings

Plaintiff filed a Bivens action against a U.S. Postal Inspector for having him locked out of his storage unit on a telephone call that required follow-up to seize then search. It was never forthcoming. A relative tried to access his storage unit the next day and couldn’t get in. The district court dismissed the claim on Heck v. Humphrey grounds, and this was error. There are multiple ways he could overcome Heck on the record here, so the case is reversed. Harvey v. United States, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4049 (11th Cir. March 8, 2017) (see Treatise § 64.14):
Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA11: Ptf stated enough to get over Heck bar; DC erred in dismissing with insufficient findings

WaPo: Employees who decline genetic testing could face penalties under proposed bill

WaPo: Employees who decline genetic testing could face penalties under proposed bill by Lena H. Sun:

Employers could impose hefty penalties on employees who decline to participate in genetic testing as part of workplace wellness programs if a bill approved by a U.S. House committee this week becomes law.

So, the Republican Party wants to invade our bodies for genetic testing? How will this be resolved under Maryland v. King and the reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s own body? (See Treatise § 32.17) You want health insurance so we need to know your genetic makeup to price it or deny it? First women’s bodies, now everybody’s body.

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on WaPo: Employees who decline genetic testing could face penalties under proposed bill

Tenth Amendment Center: Massachusetts Bill Would Ban Warrantless Stingray Spying

Tenth Amendment Center: Massachusetts Bill Would Ban Warrantless Stingray Spying by Mike Maharrey:

BOSTON, Mass. (March 10, 2017) – A Massachusetts bill would generally prohibit the warrantless use of stingray devices and the collection of electronic data stored by service providers. Final passage of the bill would not only protect privacy in Massachusetts, but would also hinder at least two aspects of the federal surveillance state.
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on Tenth Amendment Center: Massachusetts Bill Would Ban Warrantless Stingray Spying

PA: SW for house permitted search of guest’s pants that were on floor when the police arrived

Police came with a drug search warrant into the house of another where defendant was sleeping with a woman, and told him to get up. He reached for his nearby pants, and they took them and searched them finding his ID, money, and drugs. The police could search the pants because he wasn’t wearing them at the time they entered. Commonwealth v. Petty, 2017 PA Super 63, 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 163 (March 10, 2017).

Defendant’s wife called the police to tell him that he’d be going out with a gun. They stopped him at the gas station near his house and frisked him for the weapon, but did not find it. They put him in a patrol car. She observed this from the house and called the police and said that the gun was hidden in his underwear. They got him out and searched again finding the gun in his groin area. The court finds probable cause. Therefore, the question of whether reasonable suspicion dissipated with the first frisk doesn’t have to be decided. Commonwealth v. Abdul-Alim, 2017 Mass. App. LEXIS 27 (March 9, 2017).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: SW for house permitted search of guest’s pants that were on floor when the police arrived

CA9: Hearing apparent domestic abuse inside from choking and threatening to use a gun justified police entry

“The district court properly concluded that probable cause and exigent circumstances justified the police officers’ warrantless entry into the apartment. The officers heard Harris and Leanna Devad fighting; witnesses reported hearing choking sounds and hearing Devad say that Harris had a firearm in the apartment. Under these circumstances, (1) there was ‘a fair probability or substantial chance’ that a domestic violence incident had occurred, and (2) a reasonable person would have believed that entry was necessary to prevent physical harm to Devad.” Both parties consented to a further search of the premises. United States v. Harris, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4103 (9th Cir. March 8, 2017).

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA9: Hearing apparent domestic abuse inside from choking and threatening to use a gun justified police entry

ND: Cell phone subject to probation search of house where CP suspected to be on it

Defendant was on supervised probation, and his PO received information from his girlfriend that he had “provocative” pictures of clothed young girls he was uploading to a cell phone that had no service. It was reasonable to seize and search cell phones in his residence as a part of a probation search under Knights. Pictures of naked young girls were found and he was charged with child pornography. State v. White, 2017 ND 51, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 50 (March 7, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on ND: Cell phone subject to probation search of house where CP suspected to be on it

MA: Impoundment unreasonable in purported “high crime” area that was partly residential with other cars already there; Swiss Army knife not an indicator other weapons in car

Defendant was stopped and arrested in a “high crime” area [which apparently didn’t include stripping cars]. The area was partly residential and other cars were parked on the street, too.
That alone didn’t make it reasonable to have to impound the vehicle. A search of the vehicle for weapons wasn’t justified by finding a Swiss Army knife in it. Commonwealth v. Crowley-Chester, 2017 Mass. LEXIS 126 (March 9, 2017).

Defendant gets a new trial because defense counsel misinformed her of the admissibility of her blood evidence and she pled guilty. Briggs v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 1947 (Tex. App. — Corpus Christi – Edinburg March 9, 2017).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on MA: Impoundment unreasonable in purported “high crime” area that was partly residential with other cars already there; Swiss Army knife not an indicator other weapons in car

Tenth Amendment Center: New Hampshire House Passes Bill Banning Support for Warrantless Federal Spying Programs

Tenth Amendment Center: New Hampshire House Passes Bill Banning Support for Warrantless Federal Spying Programs by Michael Bolden:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Tenth Amendment Center: New Hampshire House Passes Bill Banning Support for Warrantless Federal Spying Programs

IL: Frisk depends on RS def is armed, not just committing some nebulous offense

“We reject defendant’s argument he was seized when officer Harrold requested he remove his hands from his pockets and conclude defendant was not seized until officer Harrold frisked him.” … “Accordingly, a police officer must have reasonable suspicion the individual is armed and dangerous at the time of the frisk. By so concluding, we note defendant’s arguments relating to the lack of reasonable suspicion defendant was involved in criminal activity are inapplicable.” The officer had such reasonable suspicion here. People v. Evans, 2017 IL App (4th) 140672, 2017 Ill. App. LEXIS 123 (March 9, 2017).

The evidence supports the trial court’s finding that defendant’s girlfriend consented to the search of their residence. “At the suppression hearing the State’s witness … testified that Wallace gave consent to search her residence. Wallace initially testified that she did not give consent, but then testified twice that she did not remember, was on medication and experiences blackouts.” State v. Wesley, 2017-Ohio-799, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 794 (7th Dist. March 6, 2017).*

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Frisk depends on RS def is armed, not just committing some nebulous offense

USA Today: ‘Innocent until proven guilty’ should mean what it says: Column [repealing civil forfeiture]

USA Today: ‘Innocent until proven guilty’ should mean what it says: Column by Derek Draplin and Kahryn Riley:

Every state should join Nebraska and New Mexico in repealing civil forfeiture.

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on USA Today: ‘Innocent until proven guilty’ should mean what it says: Column [repealing civil forfeiture]

OC Weekly: FBI Used Best Buy’s Geek Squad To Increase Secret Public Surveillance

OC Weekly: FBI Used Best Buy’s Geek Squad To Increase Secret Public Surveillance by R. Scott Moxley:

Recently unsealed records reveal a much more extensive secret relationship than previously known between the FBI and Best Buy’s Geek Squad, including evidence the agency trained company technicians on law-enforcement operational tactics, shared lists of targeted citizens and, to covertly increase surveillance of the public, encouraged searches of computers even when unrelated to a customer’s request for repairs.

Posted in Private search, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on OC Weekly: FBI Used Best Buy’s Geek Squad To Increase Secret Public Surveillance

W.D.Pa.: Def was fully cooperative; flight of other person in car not attributable to him

When defendant’s car was stopped, he was cooperative but the passenger ran off. When officers approached defendant, he put up his hands and fully cooperated. His handcuffing was reasonable because of the potential risk of weapons, but there was no reasonable suspicion for a search. The court won’t attribute the other man’s flight to the cooperative defendant. United States v. Parker, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33216 (W.D. Pa. March 7, 2017).

The officer corroborated the anonymous caller about students smoking pot when he smelled it as he approached them. Defendant’s nervousness and not removing his hand from his pocket supported the trial court’s finding of reasonable suspicion. [But note that this court does not make an independent determination of reasonable suspicion on this record.] In re V.G., 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 1930 (Tex. App. – El Paso March 8, 2017).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Def was fully cooperative; flight of other person in car not attributable to him

NYTimes Opinion: The Truth About the WikiLeaks C.I.A. Cache

NYTimes Opinion: The Truth About the WikiLeaks C.I.A. Cache\ by Zeynep Tufekci:

Not all that is made out to be; unfounded assumptions by the press based on hype from Wikileaks.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes Opinion: The Truth About the WikiLeaks C.I.A. Cache

CNN: Comey: ‘There is no such thing as absolute privacy in America’

CNN: Comey: ‘There is no such thing as absolute privacy in America’ by Mary Kay Mallonee & Eugene Scott:

FBI Director James Comey warned Wednesday that Americans should not have expectations of ‘absolute privacy,’ adding that he planned to finish his term leading the FBI.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CNN: Comey: ‘There is no such thing as absolute privacy in America’

The Hill: ACLU challenges warrant to search Facebook page of Dakota Access opponents

The Hill: ACLU challenges warrant to search Facebook page of Dakota Access opponents by Morgan Chalfant:

The American Civil Liberties Union is moving to quash a police warrant granted to search data on a Facebook page of a group protesting the Dakota Access pipeline.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a motion Wednesday to strike what it described as a far-reaching and unconstitutional request by the Whatcom County Sheriff’s Department in Bellingham, Wash., to search the Facebook page of the Bellingham #NODAPL Coalition.

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on The Hill: ACLU challenges warrant to search Facebook page of Dakota Access opponents

MO: A body between apartments justified an entry to see if there were other victims

Police get a call about women screaming and yelling and a body between two buildings. They show up and circumstances connect them to an apartment. A community caretaking function search for another victim is proper. State v. Shegog, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 121 (March 7, 2017).

Defendant was charged with DUI on a military base after a roadblock by Fort Stewart Military Police Department. Her allegation that the roadblock was a general crime control roadblock and not a permissible DUI roadblock has no factual support, and she does not even get a hearing on such a fact-free allegation in violation of local rule 12.1. United States v. Lovett-McGill, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32441 (S.D. March 7, 2017).

Posted in Burden of proof, Community caretaking function | Comments Off on MO: A body between apartments justified an entry to see if there were other victims

C.D.Cal.: That building inspector’s entry was governed by 4A is clearly established

A municipal building inspector’s entry into plaintiff’s building is governed by the Fourth Amendment and the law is well established. “Red-Tagging” the property for defects facially states a claim for relief and the motion to dismiss is denied. VNT Prop. 1 v. City of Buena Park, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186828 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2015), later opinion 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186840 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2015) (First and Fourteenth Amendment claims denied).

“Agent Rubalcava’s observations warranted further investigation, even though each of the factors on its own may be consistent with innocent behavior. There was reasonable suspicion for a brief investigatory stop of the Tahoe” near the border. Even though each circumstance on its own was explainable, the totality indicated reasonable suspicion. United States v. Morris, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184733 (D. Ariz. Dec. 23, 2016).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: That building inspector’s entry was governed by 4A is clearly established