E.D.Cal.: Def had acceded to eviction in NYC civil court so he lost his REP in his apartment

By the time the search occurred here, the defendant had, without doubt, been civilly evicted in NYC, and he even stipulated to loss of the apartment in Civil Court proceedings before the search occurred. Whether there was a notice placed on the door on the day of the search didn’t even matter. United States v. Almashwali, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36423 (E.D. Cal. March 14, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Def had acceded to eviction in NYC civil court so he lost his REP in his apartment

CA9: Officer has to be aware of parole or probation search waiver before the search happens

The officer has to be aware of parole or probation search waiver before the search happens, if that’s the justification. United States v. Job, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4428 (9th Cir. March 14, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Officer has to be aware of parole or probation search waiver before the search happens

D.Mont.: Def’s live-in girlfriend’s consent was enough to expand the SW beyond its particularity; she volunteered something police weren’t even looking for

Defendant had an argument with his live-in girlfriend which escalated about the time the police arrived to hear it outside. They got a search warrant for his handgun, some papers, and her belongings to help her get out. She assisted and consented to a search for a handgun, and she showed officers three auto sears. Her consent was enough to seize them although beyond the warrant. United States v. Bausch, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33300 (D.Mont. March 8, 2017).

The search incident of defendant’s cell phone was two years prior to Riley, so it isn’t excludable under Davis. Even if it was, it was harmless error. United States v. Jenkins, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4397 (7th Cir. March 13, 2017).*

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Def’s live-in girlfriend’s consent was enough to expand the SW beyond its particularity; she volunteered something police weren’t even looking for

NACDL Report: Policing Body Cameras: Policies and Procedures to Safeguard the Rights of the Accused.

Washington, DC (Mar. 15, 2017) — The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), with support from the Foundation for Criminal Justice (FCJ), today releases Policing Body Cameras: Policies and Procedures to Safeguard the Rights of the Accused. This report is the product of more than two years of careful research and deliberation. In this report, NACDL endorses the continued and wider use of body cameras as long as they are implemented with NACDL’s policy recommendations, which are set forth below and in the report. With these protections in place, body cameras have the potential to better document encounters between police officers and civilians while mitigating competing concerns about their potential for misuse or abuse. The report and recommendations represent an important contribution to critical conversations and policymaking taking place throughout the country.
Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on NACDL Report: Policing Body Cameras: Policies and Procedures to Safeguard the Rights of the Accused.

CAAFlog: Argument Preview: Considering whether the Fourth Amendment requires a temporal limitation for a search in United States v. Richards, No. 16-0727/AF

CAAFlog: Argument Preview: Considering whether the Fourth Amendment requires a temporal limitation for a search in United States v. Richards, No. 16-0727/AF by Zachary D Spilman:
Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CAAFlog: Argument Preview: Considering whether the Fourth Amendment requires a temporal limitation for a search in United States v. Richards, No. 16-0727/AF

S.D.Ala.: Hitting fog line 8 times is reason for a stop even if it doesn’t necessarily violation AL law

Touching the fog line once isn’t an offense (and dozens of cases are cited), but eight times is reasonable suspicion for a stop and at least justifies it under Heien: “While the Court questions whether touching or slightly crossing a fog line violates Ala. Code § 32-5A-88, the Court need not decide whether the type of conduct Sullivan observed amounts to a violation of Alabama traffic law. This is because even if the conduct Sullivan observed is not a violation of Alabama law, the Court finds that Sullivan’s determination that the Defendant’s conduct violated Alabama law was reasonable [under] Heien v. North Carolina, ….” United States v. Rivas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34526 (S.D. Ala. March 10, 2017).

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: Hitting fog line 8 times is reason for a stop even if it doesn’t necessarily violation AL law

D.Conn.: Protective weapons search of nightstand for a weapon invalid where def removed from house in handcuffs

The court does not believe an officer who claimed to have seen crack cocaine in a black opaque drawstring bag that was closed in the first search of his person. The court also does not believe that a much later protective sweep for weapons of a night stand was warranted since defendant was already handcuffed and out of the house. Removing a safe from defendant’s house without a warrant also was unjustified. The government fails in its burden of proof that inevitable discovery applied. The search of the safe was flagrantly bad and it is suppressed. United States v. Robertson, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33290 (D. Conn. March 8, 2017). As to the protective weapons search:
Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Protective weapons search of nightstand for a weapon invalid where def removed from house in handcuffs

The Hill: Dems back body cameras for ICE agents

The Hill: Dems back body cameras for ICE agents by Rafael Bernal:

Democrats in the House want to require immigration agents to wear body cameras amid concerns over increased immigration enforcement and the hiring of new agents.

Posted in Body searches | Comments Off on The Hill: Dems back body cameras for ICE agents

CA10: Considering info omitted from SW affidavit, there was still PC and outcome wouldn’t change

There was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest based on a co-conspirators statement. Omitted information was considered by the district court on the probable cause question, and this court agrees it wouldn’t change anything. Claeys v. Mohr, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4263 (10th Cir. March 10, 2017).

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: Considering info omitted from SW affidavit, there was still PC and outcome wouldn’t change

KS: Reclined seat here created inference of concealment of something; thus, PC

The officer saw a plastic baggie on the console with the corner torn off. Coupled with that, it was a reasonable inference that the passenger seat was reclined to conceal evidence. They added up to probable cause. State v. Howard, 2017 Kan. LEXIS 106 (March 10, 2017), aff’g 51 Kan. App. 2d 28, 339 P.3d 809 (2014):
Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on KS: Reclined seat here created inference of concealment of something; thus, PC

D.Nev.: No RS for patdown; result of patdown and car search excised from SW affidavit and remainder lacks PC because informant uncorroborated

Defendant was stopped for speeding in a residential area, and he could be ordered out of the vehicle. His patdown, however, was unreasonable because there was no reasonable suspicion for it either by his word or actions or bulges in his clothing or that he was known to be violent or associated with those who were. The officers did, however, have a CI that was uncorroborated. That made the inventory of the car invalid. There was also a search warrant for his residence. Excising the information from the stop from the search warrant application, the remainder doesn’t show probable cause because there was no attempt to corroborate the CI. United States v. Pauli, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31322 (D. Nev. Feb. 14, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32505 (D. Nev. Mar. 6, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: No RS for patdown; result of patdown and car search excised from SW affidavit and remainder lacks PC because informant uncorroborated

NH: When the RS dissipated, the stop should have ended

By the time the officer called for the drug dog, the basis for the stop (LPN) had been resolved, and defendant should have been free to leave. There was no justification or reasonable suspicion to continue the stop for anything. State v. Morrill, 2017 N.H. LEXIS 35 (March 10, 2017). From the same search: State v. Millett, 2017 N.H. LEXIS 64 (March 10, 2017).

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NH: When the RS dissipated, the stop should have ended

SD: Living with a parolee reduces your expectation of privacy in premises as to nonparolee

Defendant lived with a parolee, so she had a diminished expectation of privacy in their home (here a motel room) from parole searches. In a spot UA check, he tested positive at the home for methamphetamine, and then police asked whether there were more drugs in the room and she produced a meth pipe from her purse. State v. Kline, 2017 SD 6, 2017 S.D. LEXIS 27 (March 8, 2017).

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on SD: Living with a parolee reduces your expectation of privacy in premises as to nonparolee

D.N.M.: Opening car door to check the Nader sticker for the VIN on RS was not unreasonable

Opening a car door to check the Nader sticker for the VIN was not unreasonable and did not involve invading a space inside the car. By the time that happened, there was reasonable suspicion. Then there was consent to search the car. The passenger doesn’t have standing to challenge the search for drugs in the engine compartment. United States v. Barraza-Rocha, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184966 (D. N.M. Aug. 17, 2016), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32771 (D. N.M. March 8, 2017).

Defendant’s cell phone could be searched for messages and photos at the border, even though he’d already been arrested. United States v. Mendez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33924 (D. Ariz. March 9, 2017).

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Opening car door to check the Nader sticker for the VIN on RS was not unreasonable

The Root: US Border Agents Can Search Your Cellphone, New Senate Bill Would Require a Warrant First

The Root: US Border Agents Can Search Your Cellphone, New Senate Bill Would Require a Warrant First by Monique Judge:

The Department of Homeland Security has reported that searches of cellphones by border agents increased five-fold in just one year, and despite protections under the Fourth Amendment against unlawful search and seizure, the practice is completely legal.

Searches of cellphones increased from fewer than 5,000 in 2015 to nearly 25,000 in 2016, and according to NBC News, the practice, called “detaining” cellphones by CBP agents, began a decade ago during the George W. Bush administration, but at the time, it was highly focused on specific individuals.

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on The Root: US Border Agents Can Search Your Cellphone, New Senate Bill Would Require a Warrant First

WaPo: Facebook says police can’t use its data for ‘surveillance’

WaPo: Facebook says police can’t use its data for ‘surveillance’ by Elizabeth Dwoskin:

Facebook is cutting police departments off from a vast trove of data that has been increasingly used to monitor protesters and activists. The move, which the social network announced Monday, comes in the wake of concerns over law enforcement’s tracking of protesters’ social media accounts in places such as Ferguson, Mo., and Baltimore. It also comes at a time when chief executive Mark Zuckerberg says he is expanding the company’s mission from merely “connecting the world” into friend networks to promoting safety and community.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Facebook says police can’t use its data for ‘surveillance’

Essay: Judge Gorsuch and the Fourth Amendment, 69 Stan. L. Rev. Online 132

Sophie J. Hart & Dennis M. Martin, Essay: Judge Gorsuch and the Fourth Amendment, 69 Stan. L. Rev. Online 132 (March 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Essay: Judge Gorsuch and the Fourth Amendment, 69 Stan. L. Rev. Online 132

E.D.Wis.: USMJ declines adversary briefing by Google for a SW for email; take it to the USDJ

Google objected to a search warrant for two email accounts, whether located in the U.S. or not. Its motion for a briefing schedule is denied. Despite case law elsewhere, the District Judge is the one to take up adversarial litigation over the warrant. In re Two Email Accounts Stored at Google, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34318 (E.D. Wis. March 9, 2017).

Defendant was seen standing in a parking lot with his back to other cars and his hands in front of him, apparently urinating in public. This was reasonable suspicion. “The officer‟s observations provided him with reasonable suspicion that Defendant was urinating in public and thus committing the offense of public indecency.” The officer could then stop defendant, and he was under the influence. State v. Fuqua, 2017 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 181 (March 10, 2017).*

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: USMJ declines adversary briefing by Google for a SW for email; take it to the USDJ

IL: 13 yo couldn’t consent to search of his person

The juvenile didn’t consent because he was too young to think independently when confronted by police officers. They did, however, have reasonable suspicion for his stop for violating curfew. In re Elijah W., 2017 IL App (1st) 162648, 2017 Ill. App. LEXIS 126 (March 10, 2017) (see Treatise § 12.30 n.9).

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and his DL came back suspended. He was arrested on that. That distinguishes this case from Rodriguez because there was probable cause, and the calling for the drug dog had nothing to do with extending the stop. United States v. Tripps, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33004 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 10, 2017).

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on IL: 13 yo couldn’t consent to search of his person

IN: Def was stuck under car at gas station then freed herself before officer got over there; stop under community caretaking function was unreasonable

Defendant was stuck under her car at a gas station when the officer saw her. He started toward her and she freed herself, got in the car and was attempting to drive away when the officer stopped her. Surveying cases from all over the country, the court concludes that a community caretaking stop would have been appropriate except for here because the defendant freed herself and obviously didn’t need help. Stopping her after that was unreasonable. M. O. v. State, 2016 Ind. App. LEXIS 484 (May 12, 2016), case ordered expunged by changing name, 2017 Ind. LEXIS 203 (March 7, 2017) (see Treatise § 21.07).

Under Oregon’s more narrow automobile exception rule, a parked car with the driver behind the wheel and the engine running is “mobile” enough to dispense with a search warrant. State v. Andersen, 361 Ore. 187, 2017 Ore. LEXIS 170 (March 9, 2017), revg 269 Ore. App. 705, 346 P.3d 1224 (2015).

Posted in Automobile exception, Community caretaking function | Comments Off on IN: Def was stuck under car at gas station then freed herself before officer got over there; stop under community caretaking function was unreasonable