MA: Trial court suppression of confession on tape was clearly erroneous; with PC to arrest, def’s clothing could be seized and forensically tested

The trial court’s order suppressing defendant’s confession and the subsequent search of his clothing is reversed as clearly erroneous. Defendant’s arrest was with probable cause, and that allowed seizure and forensic testing of his clothing. Commonwealth v. Tremblay, 2017 Mass. App. LEXIS 130 (Sept. 25, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Scope of search, Search incident | Comments Off on MA: Trial court suppression of confession on tape was clearly erroneous; with PC to arrest, def’s clothing could be seized and forensically tested

Constitution Daily: Supreme Court gets ready for “long conference” today re Collins v. Virginia (pet. pending)

Constitution Daily: Supreme Court gets ready for “long conference” today

SCOTUSBlog: Issue: Whether the Fourth Amendment’s automobile exception permits a police officer, uninvited and without a warrant, to enter private property, approach a house and search a vehicle parked a few feet from the house. Collins v. Virginia, 16-1027

Posted in Automobile exception, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Constitution Daily: Supreme Court gets ready for “long conference” today re Collins v. Virginia (pet. pending)

SD: Two months of pole camera surveillance without even RS violated a REP that society would recognize as reasonable; GFE applies, however

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy that society is now prepared to recognize as reasonable from installation of a pole camera across the street from his house and monitoring it for two months based solely on a tip that he was involved in drugs. The state, however, gets the benefit of the good faith exception because this is the first time this happened. State v. Jones, 2017 SD 59, 2017 S.D. LEXIS 115 (Sept. 20, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on SD: Two months of pole camera surveillance without even RS violated a REP that society would recognize as reasonable; GFE applies, however

OR: Vehicle didn’t have to be seen moving before stop for automobile exception to apply (state constitution)

Defendant’s car didn’t have to be seen moving at the time of the stop for the automobile exception to apply. State v. Von Flue, 287 Ore. App. 798, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 1088 (Sept. 20, 2017)* (state constitution):
Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Vehicle didn’t have to be seen moving before stop for automobile exception to apply (state constitution)

OR: Testing for semen in 9 yo girl’s underwear obtained by private search required a SW (under state constitution)

Defendant’s housekeeper’s finding likely semen in his 9 year old daughter’s underwear and turning it over to the authorities was a private search. “[T]esting of the underwear for semen was a ‘search’ under the Fourth Amendment because it significantly expanded the scope of the private search by revealing information that was not known after the private search and after Quick’s inspection of the underwear.” State v. Sines, 287 Ore. App. 850, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 1084 (Sept. 20, 2017), on remand from 359 Ore. 41, 379 P.3d 502 (2016) (cited in Treatise § 18.05 n.3):
Continue reading →

Posted in Search, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Testing for semen in 9 yo girl’s underwear obtained by private search required a SW (under state constitution)

SD: Being a close friend and regular social guest of the homeowner still doesn’t give standing

Being a close friend and regular social guest of the homeowner still doesn’t give standing; it just isn’t a strong enough connection to the premises. He cared for the homeowner’s cat on occasion, but that wasn’t explained. State v. Gaters, 2017 SD 60, 2017 S.D. LEXIS 112 (Sept. 20, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on SD: Being a close friend and regular social guest of the homeowner still doesn’t give standing

WA: Def’s new crime of obstruction wasn’t subject to suppression for illegal arrest

There is no general obligation to cooperate with the police, but there is a duty not to resist an arrest. Defendant’s obstruction was a new crime not subject to a motion to suppress for the alleged prior illegality of the arrest. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress for strategic reasons, and it would have lost on the merits anyway. State v. D.E.D., 2017 Wash. App. LEXIS 2135 (Sept. 19, 2017).

District court did not clearly err in finding consent to search. United States v. Songlin, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18283 (4th Cir. Sept. 21, 2017)* (Anders brief); United States v. Rogers, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18350 (5th Cir. Sept. 22, 2017).*

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on WA: Def’s new crime of obstruction wasn’t subject to suppression for illegal arrest

W.D.La.: Dismantling car battery within scope of consent to search car when drugs suspected there

Merely touching the fog line isn’t a safety factor, but the Louisiana courts have sustained that as a reason for a stop, so this court finds this stop reasonable. Defendant consented to a search of the car, and that would include under the hood. Because drugs were suspected to be and were in the battery, the authorized scope of the search included dismantling the battery. United States v. Hernandez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154656 (W.D. La. Aug. 4, 2017),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153914 (W.D. La. Sept. 20, 2017).*

Defendant’s driving erratically in a Wendy’s parking lot while communicating with the CI about where the guy was he was supposed to meet up for a drug deal was reasonable suspicion. State v. Brumfield, 2017 La. App. LEXIS 1684 (La.App. 1 Cir. Sept. 21, 2017).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Dismantling car battery within scope of consent to search car when drugs suspected there

Texas Observer: Body Cam Policies in Texas Exacerbate a System Designed to Protect Police, Critics Say

Texas Observer: Body Cam Policies in Texas Exacerbate a System Designed to Protect Police, Critics Say by Michael Barajas:

Civil rights advocates worry interpretation of a 2015 body camera law could help cops avoid prosecution as much as it ensures police accountability.
Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on Texas Observer: Body Cam Policies in Texas Exacerbate a System Designed to Protect Police, Critics Say

ID: Frisk doesn’t allow opening containers that can’t reasonably contain weapons; search incident doctrine doesn’t apply to frisk because no arrest

The search incident doctrine doesn’t apply to a stop and frisk. Thus, when a container is removed from a person in a frisk and the officer has no reasonable basis for concluding that the container has a weapon in it, opening the container is unreasonable. And, without an arrest, search incident doesn’t apply to a frisk. State v. Lee, 2017 Ida. LEXIS 277 (Sept. 22, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on ID: Frisk doesn’t allow opening containers that can’t reasonably contain weapons; search incident doctrine doesn’t apply to frisk because no arrest

OH7: Enclosed porch door was curtilage, but inside door was threshold door

Defendant’s house had an unlocked porch door and a door inside. The porch door was part of the curtilage, but it was reasonable for persons visiting to go to the inside door and knock. “Based on this record, the facts and circumstances demonstrate that it was reasonable for the officers to believe that the interior door was the threshold door.” Once inside, the record demonstrated that the defendant consented to a search of the premises rather than have the premises effectively seized for a search warrant to be obtained. [Officers observed enough to have probable cause.] State v. Green, 2017-Ohio-7757, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 4103 (7th Dist. Sept. 18, 2017).

Defendant’s speeding, demeanor and appearance, and admission he’d consumed alcohol was reasonable suspicion. State v. Adams, 2017-Ohio-7743, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 4077 (2d Dist. Sept. 22, 2017).*

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on OH7: Enclosed porch door was curtilage, but inside door was threshold door

NC: Inconsistent stories from the passenger and driver alone isn’t RS

The passenger’s and driver’s stories weren’t inconsistent enough to justify reasonable suspicion. There were no other facts justifying suspicion of criminality. The officer asked about weapons, but he said that was common for a 4 am stop. State v. Nicholson, 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 769 (Sept. 19, 2017).

“Assuming without deciding that the search warrants lacked probable cause, the Court concludes that the evidence is nonetheless admissible under the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule as articulated in United States v. Leon, ….” United States v. Schulz, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153134 (D. Minn. June 26, 2017),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151923 (D. Minn. Sept. 19, 2017).* [That’s just lazy, yet authorized by many appellate courts; what is or is not probable cause remains unresolved. Don’t the police and public have a need to know? Apparently not.]

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Inconsistent stories from the passenger and driver alone isn’t RS

DE: two on motions to suppress out of time

Motion to file a motion to suppress out of time is denied for not showing a sufficient excuse. Even so, defendant doesn’t allege standing, so he couldn’t win if it was allowed to be filed. State v. Boyd, 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 466 (Aug. 22, 2017)

Defense counsel’s failure to file motions timely was inexcusable and no excuse was offered. The case has been pending two years. Nevertheless, after a continuance was granted and the state wanted the motions heard [to avoid a later IAC claim], the court agreed to. State v. Hamilton, 2017 Del. Super. LEXIS 457 (Sept. 7, 2017). [A wise prosecutor, avoiding an IAC claim. We don’t know that’s the prosecutor’s reasoning, but that’s certainly the most logical.]

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on DE: two on motions to suppress out of time

D.Colo.: Where vehicle registered to both occupants, either could be asked for consent

When defendants were stopped for a traffic offense, reasonable suspicion arose that neither was a licensed driver when they produced only ID cards. Where the car was registered to both the driver and passenger, either could be asked for consent. The Fourth Amendment doesn’t require that only the driver be asked or be asked first. United States v. Gomez-Avila, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189879 (D. Colo. March 19, 2015).

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Where vehicle registered to both occupants, either could be asked for consent

D.Neb.: Over a year of CSLI was reasonable where the conspiracy covered over two years

Defendants were charged with a series of ATM robberies, and the government sought historical CSLI to link the defendants together. This is third party information. The fact that information was sought for over a year in some of the defendants’ cases isn’t determinative of unreasonableness because the period of the crimes covers over two years. Plus, CSLI isn’t as intrusive as GPS because it’s approximate. United States v. Brown, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154374 (D. Neb. Aug. 23, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152864 (D. Neb. Sept. 20, 2017).

Another Playpen warrant sustained. United States v. Scanlon, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151471 (D. Vt. April 26, 2017).*

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Over a year of CSLI was reasonable where the conspiracy covered over two years

Jurist: A Digital World: Why Law Enforcement Needs to Obey the Fourth Amendment

Jurist: A Digital World: Why Law Enforcement Needs to Obey the Fourth Amendment by Victoria Drake

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Jurist: A Digital World: Why Law Enforcement Needs to Obey the Fourth Amendment

MT: Other than def’s parking on a used car lot being suspicious, no other fact developed to show RS

Defendant’s vehicle was parked on a used car lot, but nothing else was going on. The officer who spotted the car called for backup and four officers came up to the vehicle from behind. Parking on the lot alone was suspicious, but no other fact developed that showed reasonable suspicion. State v. Hoover, 2017 MT 236, 2017 Mont. LEXIS 586 (Sept. 21, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MT: Other than def’s parking on a used car lot being suspicious, no other fact developed to show RS

Cal.4: Electronic search condition for probation for attempted robbery was reasonable

An electronic search condition for probation for attempted robbery was reasonable. Defendant didn’t object to a home search condition which is just as onerous. People v. Trujillo, 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 813 (4th Dist. Sept. 21, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.4: Electronic search condition for probation for attempted robbery was reasonable

MI: If the arrest is invalid, the inventory that follows it is invalid

If the arrest is invalid, the inventory that follows it is invalid. People v. Wood, 2017 Mich. App. LEXIS 1482 (Sept. 19, 2017).

Defendant’s admission he had open containers in the vehicle justified a search for them, and, after they were found, a search of a bag finding marijuana was reasonable. Howard v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 8867 (Tex. App. – Tyler Sept. 20, 2017).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory | Comments Off on MI: If the arrest is invalid, the inventory that follows it is invalid

MA: Admin search warrant of def’s side yard couldn’t be used for criminal search

Defendant’s house had been damaged by a fire, and local inspectors obtained an administrative inspection warrant to enter the property. An administrative warrant can’t be used, however, for a criminal investigation, and that’s what they did. They went to the side yard to look for evidence defendant was stealing electricity. They should have left the premises, secure it if they could, and obtain a criminal search warrant. The motion to suppress should have been granted. Commonwealth v. O’Donnell, 2017 Mass. App. LEXIS 127 (Sept. 21, 2017):
Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on MA: Admin search warrant of def’s side yard couldn’t be used for criminal search