CA1: SCA emergency request for Kik app customer info didn’t implicate Carpenter concerns

The government used an emergency application for user data from the Kik app after learning that defendant was allegedly sending child pornography to children through it. The information was nowhere near the quality and intrusiveness of the information in Carpenter, and it was basically just third-party information. The motion to suppress is denied. United States v. Hood, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 9817 (1st Cir. Apr. 3, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Stored Communications Act, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA1: SCA emergency request for Kik app customer info didn’t implicate Carpenter concerns

E.D.Mich.: Health care fraud SW also reached def’s home because related mail was received there

In a health care fraud case, the fact some mail within the scheme came to defendant’s home was nexus for the search warrant including the home. “All of the items identified in the indictment were tied to or related to potential instruments of Defendants’ alleged health care fraud scheme. The search warrants did not violate the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment. [¶] The affidavit also sufficiently establishes a nexus to search the Defendants’ residence. The affidavit provided evidence that Defendants brought work related materials to their home and that they received work related materials through the mail at their home. Defendants fail to demonstrate that probable cause was lacking to conduct the search of their home. [¶] Finally, contrary to Defendants’ arguments here, the search warrant affidavit at issue is supported by more than mere suspicions or beliefs, and does in fact contain the underlying factual circumstances of Defendants’ criminal activity. The affidavit cannot be characterized as a ‘bare bones’ affidavit.” United States v. Barnwal, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57181 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 3, 2019).*

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Health care fraud SW also reached def’s home because related mail was received there

NPR: This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism—April 7

“Judicial activism” is determined only by whether your side won:

NPR: This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism—April 7 by Ed Whelan:
Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on NPR: This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism—April 7

Cato blog: A Pretextual Traffic Stop Should Require Sufficient Pretext

Cato blog: A Pretextual Traffic Stop Should Require Sufficient Pretext by Jonathan Blanks:
Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on Cato blog: A Pretextual Traffic Stop Should Require Sufficient Pretext

NYLJ: Queens Attorney Convicted in Scheme to Reduce Client’s Prison Sentence

NYLJ: Queens Attorney Convicted in Scheme to Reduce Client’s Prison Sentence by Dan M. Clark.

A call was recorded between the defendant defense lawyer and the client calling on a smuggled cell phone from jail.

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NYLJ: Queens Attorney Convicted in Scheme to Reduce Client’s Prison Sentence

Techdirt: Appeals Court Says It’s OK For Cops To Steal Stuff From Citizens

Techdirt: Appeals Court Says It’s OK For Cops To Steal Stuff From Citizens by Tim Cushing:
Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Techdirt: Appeals Court Says It’s OK For Cops To Steal Stuff From Citizens

NPR: Motel 6 To Pay $12 Million After Improperly Giving Guest Lists To ICE

NPR: Motel 6 To Pay $12 Million After Improperly Giving Guest Lists To ICE by Francesca Paris:
Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on NPR: Motel 6 To Pay $12 Million After Improperly Giving Guest Lists To ICE

D.Md.: Recorded call about a murder was PC for search of phone for evidence of the call

A recorded telephone call with the defendant allegedly discussing a murder supported probable cause to search his cell phone for evidence of the call. United States v. Worthy, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56275 (D. Md. Apr. 2, 2019).

Defendant was accused of computer hacking with a distributed denial of services attack on a “protected computer” for ransom that was linked back to him. A state issued search warrant for his computers was based on probable cause. There was sufficient nexus by inference shown to defendant though the IP addresses of the wireless accounts of others, his proximity to them, and his creating the subject user names just before the attack. “Therefore, in addition to sharing the same phone number, user larned_seller’s address is within only 200 yards, at most, of the location of the wireless access points through which the three other users were accessing the internet. This fact makes it reasonable to infer that all four users are the same individual.” United States v. Golightley, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56083 (D. Kan. Apr. 2, 2019).*

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Md.: Recorded call about a murder was PC for search of phone for evidence of the call

D.Ariz.: No damages collectable in a motion for return of property

One can’t get damages in a Rule 41(g) motion for return of property. Hall v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56524 (D. Ariz. Apr. 2, 2019).

There was probable cause for search of the premises, and defendant lacks standing because he showed no connection to it. United States v. Rice, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56031 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 2, 2019).*

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No damages collectable in a motion for return of property

CA11: Warrantless search of crawlspace after hostage standoff was reasonable

After a hostage standoff, police officers’ warrantless search of defendant’s crawlspace for other potential hostages was reasonable based on what they knew and didn’t know. United States v. Cooks, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 9775 (11th Cir. Apr. 2, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA11: Warrantless search of crawlspace after hostage standoff was reasonable

IL: Odor of marijuana detected during a knock-and-talk was reasonably obtained

Odor of marijuana detected during a knock-and-talk was reasonably obtained. People v. Brandt, 2019 IL App (4th) 180219, 2019 Ill. App. LEXIS 224 (Apr. 2, 2019).

There was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest for constructive possession. He was long time guest at the house where drug deals had been conducted with a CI, and he was there asleep when the warrant was executed. Rogers v. City of New York, 2019 NY Slip Op 02479, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2449 (1st Dept. Apr. 2, 2019).*

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on IL: Odor of marijuana detected during a knock-and-talk was reasonably obtained

CA2: Unlicensed and unauthorized and driver of rental car had no standing under Byrd

Unlicensed and unauthorized driver of rental car had no standing under Byrd. United States v. Lyle, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 9457 (2d Cir. Apr. 1, 2019).

Defendant signed a search waiver as a condition of community control, and that was binding on him. The firearm found in his residence is not suppressed. United States v. Pearson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55145 (S.D. Ind. Apr. 1, 2019).*

The affidavit for search warrant for e-currency records on a computer [about the only place they’d be] wasn’t stale. United States v. Seleznev, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 9489 (9th Cir. Apr. 1, 2019).*

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA2: Unlicensed and unauthorized and driver of rental car had no standing under Byrd

CA8: Def’s lie about cell phone password in response to SW for phone warranted obstruction of justice enhancement

Defendant’s lying about his phone password in response to a search warrant for the phone warranted an obstruction of justice enhancement on the Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Beattie, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 9462 (8th Cir. Apr. 1, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on CA8: Def’s lie about cell phone password in response to SW for phone warranted obstruction of justice enhancement

TN: Credibility determinations in motions to suppress are the province of the trial court

Credibility of the witnesses at a suppression hearing is entrusted to the trial court, and it isn’t subject to review on appeal. State v. Belt, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 208 (Apr. 1, 2019).

A conclusory or general objection to the R&R without citation of authority, pointing to errors of findings of fact or argument was insufficient.” Objections that, as here, merely ‘dispute[ ] the correctness of the magistrate’s recommendation’ without specifying the findings that Defendant ‘believe[s] were in error[,] … amount to general objections’ and do not warrant de novo review. Miller v. Currie, 50 F.3d 373, 380 (6th Cir. 1995). Further, the Court, upon review, finds Wagoner’s thin remonstrances meritless.” United States v. Wagoner, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55494 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 1, 2019).*

Posted in Standards of review | Comments Off on TN: Credibility determinations in motions to suppress are the province of the trial court

N.D.W.Va.: Factual mistakes in the affidavit for SW didn’t undermine the factual showing; the GFE also applies

There were factual mistakes in the affidavit for search warrant, but it doesn’t undermine the probable cause showing. In any event, the mistakes are in good faith and the good faith exception applies. United States v. Naum, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55174 (N.D. W.Va. Mar. 25, 2019), adopted 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55172 (N.D. W.Va. Apr. 1, 2019).

2255 “Petitioner’s argument that his counsel failed to challenge his purported arrest is wholly unsupported by the record.” Overton v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54921 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2019).*

Defendant was on premises where a search warrant was executed, and it was reasonable have him under detention under Michigan v. Summers and Muehler v. Mena. United States v. Washington, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55548 (D. Ore. Apr. 1, 2019).*

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Factual mistakes in the affidavit for SW didn’t undermine the factual showing; the GFE also applies

D.R.I.: Officers don’t actually have to be applying for a SW for inevitable discovery to apply if they have PC

The court finds the consent to search given by a woman in the house was voluntary and wasn’t based on a threat to take her child away by DCYF. She drew that conclusion herself because she was concerned about it. “The Court also finds that, in the absence of Pimentel’s consent, CPD officers would have actually applied for a search warrant. Defendant places great weight on the fact that none of the officers on the scene had started preparing to apply for a warrant, perhaps by preparing an affidavit for a search warrant or contacted a magistrate judge before they obtained Pimentel’s consent to search the residence. He argues that this proves CPD officers would not have actually obtained a search warrant. … However, this argument ignores the fact that, during his conversation with Pimentel, Det. Fuoroli specifically informed her that, if she did not consent to the search, he would apply for a search warrant.” They clearly had probable cause, and any request for a search warrant would have been granted. Therefore, inevitable discovery applies. United States v. Almonte, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55332 (D. R.I. Apr. 1, 2019).*

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Officers don’t actually have to be applying for a SW for inevitable discovery to apply if they have PC

CNET: US border search demand violated Apple employee’s constitutional rights, ACLU says

CNET: US border search demand violated Apple employee’s constitutional rights, ACLU says by Steven Shankland:
Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CNET: US border search demand violated Apple employee’s constitutional rights, ACLU says

EFF: Your Fourth Amendment Rights Should Not be Limited by Terms of Service

EFF: Your Fourth Amendment Rights Should Not be Limited by Terms of Service by Jennifer Lynch:

Last week, we filed an amicus brief in U.S. v. Wilson, a federal appellate case, in which we argued that email providers’ terms of service can’t limit your Fourth Amendment rights. This is the second brief we’ve filed in less than a year addressing this important point.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: Your Fourth Amendment Rights Should Not be Limited by Terms of Service

Business Insider: Your iPhone keeps a detailed list of every location you frequent

Business Insider: Your iPhone keeps a detailed list of every location you frequent — here’s how to delete your history and shut the feature off for good by Paige Leskin:
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on Business Insider: Your iPhone keeps a detailed list of every location you frequent

W.D.Pa.: State court’s resolution of consent issue wasn’t “unreasonable application” of precedent in 2254 proceeding

The state court’s resolution of the consent to search issue was not an “unreasonable application” of precedent in a 2254 proceeding. “In order to overcome AEDPA’s standard of review, Petitioner must show that the state court’s decision ‘cannot reasonably be justified under existing Supreme Court precedent[,]’ … , and his general complaints about his attorney’s representation fall far short of meeting this burden. Furthermore, based on both the PCRA and Superior Court finding that Petitioner’s attorney had no basis to challenge Tuttle’s consent, Petitioner cannot show prejudice in that an omnibus pre-trial motion requesting suppression of evidence on this basis would have been successful. As such, he is not entitled to habeas relief on this ground.” Stackhouse v. Coleman, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54845 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2019).*

Defendant litigated his search issue on direct appeal, and he can’t do it again in a 2255. Duval v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54857 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 30, 2019).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: State court’s resolution of consent issue wasn’t “unreasonable application” of precedent in 2254 proceeding