ID: Drug dog’s touching nose on the car door was not a trespass

The drug dog’s touching his nose on the car door was not a trespass. State v. Pendleton, 2026 Ida. LEXIS 147 (Oct. 14, 2026).

The search warrant for defendant’s medical records for his DUI with injury was particular. State v. Bradley, 2026 Ga. App. LEXIS 478 (Oct. 14, 2026).*

The officer had reasonable suspicion defendant was involved in drugs and legitimately stopped him for speeding. Within 3½ minutes, they conversed about defendant’s alleged drug involvement and the officer asked for and got consent. The search was valid. State v. Idhen, 2026 MT 246 (Oct. 13, 2026).*

“Defendant Deputies evicted Plaintiff pursuant to a writ of execution and Plaintiff does not otherwise identify any unreasonable uses of force. Therefore, the Court has no factual content to draw any reasonable inference that any deputy may be liable of conduct rising to a Fourth Amendment violation.” Gottfried v. Keystone Prop. Mgmt., LLC, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234433 (D. Or. Oct. 14, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Pretext, Qualified immunity, Trespass. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.