CA11: Shooting a man with a gun was close enough to reasonable under the circumstances for QI

Officers get qualified immunity for shooting a mentally retarded man they knew of when he was wandering the highway and was reported flashing a handgun at people. When the police encountered him, he wouldn’t show his hands and kept one hand behind his back, as if holding the gun there. Davis v. Edwards, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 24176 (11th Cir. Aug. 14, 2019):*
Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Shooting a man with a gun was close enough to reasonable under the circumstances for QI

M.D.Pa.: Lack of standing cuts off a Franks challenge

Defendant lacked standing in the place searched, so he’s denied a Franks hearing to challenge that omission from the affidavit for search warrant. “The only connection between Defendant and 10 H Hall Manor reflected in the Affidavit of Probable Cause is that the informant tipped the police that Defendant, identified by his nickname ‘Menace,’ sold drugs from that address.” United States v. Sawyers, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137080 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2019).

The parties’ dispute as to when defendant was seized is resolved by the government’s concession it was at least when he was ordered to put his hands in the air and get down on the ground. United States v. Cardona, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136974 (D. N.M. Aug. 14, 2019).*

“In this case, Dorsey abandoned his phone by failing to contest its seizure or otherwise seek its return.” [What a Catch-22 that is. What’s wrong with waiting for the search and then contesting it when you find out about it. Seeking return of a cell phone is an utterly futile act when the government merely says: “It might be evidence.” because that means it’s denied.] United States v. Dorsey, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136887 (D. Md. Aug. 14, 2019).*

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Lack of standing cuts off a Franks challenge

MN: Forced anoscopy under sedation was unreasonable under Winston

Strapping defendant down for a forced anoscopy under sedation in the presence of nonmedical personnel was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. The court applied Winston v. Lee on forced surgery, noting that several courts have applied it to nonsurgical body invasions. State v. Brown, 2019 Minn. LEXIS 438 (Aug. 14, 2019).
Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches | Comments Off on MN: Forced anoscopy under sedation was unreasonable under Winston

OH5: RS existed for traffic stop despite fact the sign wasn’t high enough under the traffic code

The officer had reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop despite the fact the sign he ignored wasn’t the proper height under the motor vehicle code. State v. Norman, 2019-Ohio-3242, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3331 (5th Dist. Aug. 12, 2019).*

Reasonable suspicion defendant accessed child pornography was the justification for defendant’s stop, and he voluntarily agreed to go back to his house with the police. He was interviewed at home and then arrested. United States v. Sloane, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137057 (M.D. La. Aug. 13, 2019).*

Defendant’s guilty plea waived his Fourth Amendment claim that he was arrested without a warrant. [Which doesn’t matter in felony cases anyway.] Hays v. State, 2019 Miss. App. LEXIS 389 (Aug. 13, 2019).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: RS existed for traffic stop despite fact the sign wasn’t high enough under the traffic code

D.Neb.: No REP in items hidden in bushes

“Defendant has not met his burden to establish a reasonable expectation of privacy in the items seized from the bush or on the ground at the apartment complex. Police seized items from public areas of an apartment complex, not from Defendant’s person.” Defendant was arrested after that with probable cause. United States v. Johnson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136106 (D. Neb Aug. 13, 2019).

2255 petitioner litigated his suppression motion before conviction, and it was procedurally barred by a post-conviction proceeding except for limited circumstances which aren’t here. Also his allegations are too vague to support relief. Braden v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137448 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 14, 2019).*

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on D.Neb.: No REP in items hidden in bushes

D.D.C.: Def tossed gun as encounter started and that was abandonment, but the court has questions about the encounter

The DC Gun Recovery Unit encountered a person on the street and talked to him, but by the time a more intensive encounter occurred, something that troubled the court, defendant had tossed the gun. United States v. Meekins, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135955 (D. D.C. Aug. 13, 2019)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Seizure | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Def tossed gun as encounter started and that was abandonment, but the court has questions about the encounter

W.D.Mich.: Smell of MJ in a MMJ state may still provide PC for search; defendant has to have documentation justifying possession

The smell of marijuana coming from a car in a MMJ state can still provide probable cause. The occupants have to produce proof of compliance with the law, and then they might be immune from arrest. United States v. Trevino, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135962 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 9, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: Smell of MJ in a MMJ state may still provide PC for search; defendant has to have documentation justifying possession

S.D.Ohio: Officer’s claimed exigency expired during the delay waiting for an ambulance; warrantless entry invalid

Two defendants had standing in a camper. The officers’ warrantless entry into it was without exigency because the exigency, if it existed, passed. It was based on a suspected overdose, but the officer admitted he had only a couple of minutes but waited 30 minutes until an ambulance arrived. United States v. Mullins, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136051 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 13, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Officer’s claimed exigency expired during the delay waiting for an ambulance; warrantless entry invalid

CA8 (en banc): Takedown of non-violent misdemeanant walking away was subject to QI

Defendant officer’s takedown of a misdemeanant who was walking away from him wasn’t clearly established and he gets qualified immunity. Kelsay v. Ernst, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 24059 (8th Cir. Aug. 13, 2019) (en banc; 4 dissents)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8 (en banc): Takedown of non-violent misdemeanant walking away was subject to QI

TX3: Finding drugs on the driver is PC to search the car

Finding drugs on the person during a lawful stop and search of the person provides probable cause to search the car. State v. Pena, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 7015 (Tex. App. – Austin Aug. 13, 2019).

The search warrant legitimately included the curtilage as the place to search, and it included cars and outbuilding. United States v. Barr, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136357 (N.D. Ga. June 24, 2019),* adopted, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135900 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 13, 2019).*

Reasonable suspicion came from defendant’s evasive answers, distancing himself from the car, and prior criminal history. Prior to the stop, defendant’s driving seemed evasive, trying to get the officer off his tail. United States v. Chenier, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136310 (D. Neb. Aug. 13, 2019).*

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX3: Finding drugs on the driver is PC to search the car

Slate: Greyhound Says It’s Keeping Drivers Safe by Allowing CBP Searches. The Drivers Disagree.

Slate: Greyhound Says It’s Keeping Drivers Safe by Allowing CBP Searches. The Drivers Disagree. by Jeremy Stahl:

They’re calling out the company for claiming the policy is about drivers’ “safety.”

Posted in Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on Slate: Greyhound Says It’s Keeping Drivers Safe by Allowing CBP Searches. The Drivers Disagree.

D.Mass.: GFE applies to scope of search under SW where place to be searched was two floors, not one

The issue here is whether the search warrant was overbroad because it turned out that the place to be searched was really two floors not one, but it wasn’t obvious from the outside. “The Court need not resolve this complex issue because, even if the warrant only authorized a search of the second floor and the officers exceeded its scope by searching the third-floor bedroom, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies.” United States v. Pimentel, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134853 (D. Mass. Aug. 12, 2019).

Shelby County officers shooting a suicidal man with a knife at his own throat was excessive force. “May police officers shoot an uncooperative individual when he presents an immediate risk to himself but not to others? No, case law makes clear. We thus affirm the district court’s decision to deny the officers’ motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity.” Studdard v. Shelby County, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23894 (6th Cir. Aug. 12, 2019).*

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Mass.: GFE applies to scope of search under SW where place to be searched was two floors, not one

Forbes: Surveillance Technology And Cultural Notions Of Privacy

Forbes: Surveillance Technology And Cultural Notions Of Privacy by Julian Vigo:
Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Forbes: Surveillance Technology And Cultural Notions Of Privacy

Bloomberg: Facebook Paid Contractors to Transcribe Users’ Audio Chats

Bloomberg: Facebook Paid Contractors to Transcribe Users’ Audio Chats by Sara Frier:

Facebook Inc. has been paying hundreds of outside contractors to transcribe clips of audio from users of its services, according to people with knowledge of the work.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Bloomberg: Facebook Paid Contractors to Transcribe Users’ Audio Chats

CNS: Facial Software Test Falsely Flags 26 California Lawmakers

Courthouse News Service: Facial Software Test Falsely Flags 26 California Lawmakers by Matthew Renda:

When the American Civil Liberties Union used facial recognition software to cross-check 120 California legislators against a database of 25,000 publicly available mugshots, the algorithm falsely identified 26 of the lawmakers as someone who’s been arrested.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CNS: Facial Software Test Falsely Flags 26 California Lawmakers

The Crime Report: A Mixed Assessment of Police Body Cameras

The Crime Report: A Mixed Assessment of Police Body Cameras:

Studies show the body camera revolution hasn’t curbed police shootings of unarmed Americans, nor has it led to more prosecutions of police officers for misconduct. Yet the cameras have had profound and often positive impacts on policing. For officers, they have become important backup in a video era when controversial arrests go viral.

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on The Crime Report: A Mixed Assessment of Police Body Cameras

The Appeal: Chicago Police Pointed Guns At And Traumatized Children in Botched Raids, Lawsuits Allege

The Appeal: Chicago Police Pointed Guns At And Traumatized Children in Botched Raids, Lawsuits Allege by Lauren Gill:

Children as young as 4 years old are suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder as a result, the complaints say.

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on The Appeal: Chicago Police Pointed Guns At And Traumatized Children in Botched Raids, Lawsuits Allege

CA11: Ptf’s excessive force claim overcomes QI; his facts show clearly established law violated

Defendants were properly denied qualified immunity in using excessive force to arrest plaintiff. Plaintiff’s version of the facts showed clearly established rights were violated. Heck v. Humphrey didn’t apply because plaintiff wasn’t seeking to attack his conviction. Cendan v. Trujillo, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23884 (11th Cir. Aug. 12, 2019).*

There was reasonable suspicion on the totality to get defendant out of the car for a FST. State v. Osborne, 2019-Ohio-3235, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3327 (11th Dist. Aug. 12, 2019).*

A search warrant issued for a doctor’s office and a pharmacy for records. Defendant was a subtenant and lacked standing in the area of the doctor’s office. Even so, the warrant was specific enough to cover the places searched. United States v. Ranochak, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134977 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 12, 2019).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Ptf’s excessive force claim overcomes QI; his facts show clearly established law violated

E.D.Mich.: 2255 IAC challenge to warrant completely contradicted by record of conviction and appeal [this was farfetched]

Defendant’s 2255 Fourth Amendment/Sixth Amendment ineffectiveness challenge completely contradicts the position taken in the district court and his admissions before conviction and on appeal. Defense counsel couldn’t be ineffective for not coming up with that. United States v. Fonville, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134949 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 12, 2019).

Defendant’s Franks challenge came post verdict. Even assuming it was timely based on what was learned at trial, it fails for lack of a “substantial basis” of knowing or reckless falsity. United States v. Mayweather, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135413 (D. Minn. Aug. 12, 2019).*

Defendant was stopped at an immigration checkpoint and was told that his car was going to be inspected. Therefore, there is no issue of consent. He was seized at the checkpoint and couldn’t leave. United States v. Norris, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135165 (D. Ariz. Aug. 12, 2019).*

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Immigration checkpoints, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: 2255 IAC challenge to warrant completely contradicted by record of conviction and appeal [this was farfetched]

CA7: Ptf’s $1 verdict for illegal search after successful suppression affirmed; what is proximate cause?

Plaintiff’s 1983 claim for illegal search which resulted in suppression in state court resulted in a $1 verdict. A fascinating opinion on proximate cause of damages and a Fourth and Fifth Amendment violation which is worth the read for future cases, but the court ultimately concludes that the $1 verdict would be affirmed. Martin v. Marinez, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23972 (7th Cir. Aug. 12, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf’s $1 verdict for illegal search after successful suppression affirmed; what is proximate cause?