S.D.Ill.: Witness’s memory failure on the stand at trial didn’t support a Franks challenge

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising a Franks challenge mid-trial when a participant in the search warrant process had a memory failure on the stand as to something. Offutt v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231418 (S.D. Ill. Oct. 8, 2026).*

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a window area of a hallway outside the apartment searched that was just as readily accessible to two other apartments. And, defendant didn’t live in any apartment. United States v. Guerrero, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231956 (D. Mass. Oct. 9, 2026).*

The court doesn’t have to decide standing or scope of consent. Inevitable discovery applies. The officers plainly had enough information for probable cause and would have otherwise sought a warrant. “The First Circuit has repeatedly found the inevitable discovery doctrine applicable under similar circumstances.” United States v. Sanchez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231005 (D. Mass. Oct. 8, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.