KY: Def’s car search lacked PC; not def’s burden to show state lacked exigency, it’s the state’s burden to show it

The search of defendant’s car was completely unjustified. The car was parked and he was sitting in it. The officer was curious and approached to talk to him. Nothing was seen suggesting crime was “a foot.” The state’s argument that defendant didn’t show that the officer lacked exigent circumstances below doesn’t mean anything because there was no probable cause at all. Commonwealth v. Garrett, 2019 Ky. App. LEXIS 172 (Sept. 27, 2019).

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on KY: Def’s car search lacked PC; not def’s burden to show state lacked exigency, it’s the state’s burden to show it

D.Mont.: Def’s VA disability rating medical exam wasn’t a violation of the 4A

Defendant received VA benefits for 100% disability. A follow-up visit was required to verify and he failed to show. As a result, it was downgraded to 70% which was a loss of about 3/4ths of his benefits. He was told he could contest, and he did. A new examination was scheduled, and he appeared. He was indicted for fraud. He contests the examination under the Fourth Amendment, and the court finds that he can’t satisfy the first prong of the Katz test that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the examination that nobody could testify to it. United States v. Hughes, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167127 (D. Mont. Sept. 27, 2019).

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Def’s VA disability rating medical exam wasn’t a violation of the 4A

OH1: State had burden to show inventory policy was followed and done in good faith

When the state relies on inventory to justify a search of a car, it has to put on proof that the inventory policy was followed and that it was done in good faith. State v. Beasley, 2019-Ohio-3936, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4017 (1st Dist. Sept. 27, 2019).

The state failed to put on proof at the suppression hearing that the officer had an objective belief defendant was intentionally avoiding arrest. The state also failed to show the officer had a reasonable suspicion defendant was armed. Thus, the frisk after the arrest was illegal. Goodman v. State, 2019 Fla. App. LEXIS 14644 (Fla. 2d DCA Sept. 27, 2019).*

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory | Comments Off on OH1: State had burden to show inventory policy was followed and done in good faith

Wired: The Ringification of Suburban Life

Wired: The Ringification of Suburban Life by Louise Matsakis (“Consumer surveillance cameras are everywhere now, and they’re capturing moments we otherwise would never have known happened.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Wired: The Ringification of Suburban Life

NYTimes: Stormy Daniels Reaches $450,000 Settlement Over 2018 Strip Club Arrest

NYTimes: Stormy Daniels Reaches $450,000 Settlement Over 2018 Strip Club Arrest by Emily S. Rueb (No further comment required.)

Posted in Police misconduct | Comments Off on NYTimes: Stormy Daniels Reaches $450,000 Settlement Over 2018 Strip Club Arrest

PA: In a MMJ state, the smell of MJ can still be PC

“Over the past several years, nearly half of our Sister States and this Commonwealth have legalized medical marijuana. Some States have also repealed their prohibitions against recreational use; Pennsylvania has not. [¶] In this appeal, John Batista makes the novel argument that, because marijuana is now medically available in Pennsylvania, police officers may no longer rely upon its smell as a factor for developing probable cause. Like the trial court, we reject this theory. In certain instances, the smell of marijuana may still indicate that a crime is afoot, because the growth, distribution, possession, and use of marijuana without a state-issued permit remains illegal. Thus, the magistrate had a substantial basis to issue a search warrant for Batista’s garage, and we affirm the order denying suppression.” E.g., the smell of a grow operation is probable cause unless it’s licensed. Commonwealth v. Batista, 2019 PA Super 291 (Sept. 27, 2019).

In other news: USA Today: Pennsylvania governor calls for legalization of recreational marijuana (Sept. 25, 2019).

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on PA: In a MMJ state, the smell of MJ can still be PC

W.D.Mo.: SW for cell phone includes its SD card, just as a computer SW includes the hard drive

A search warrant for a cell phone includes the SD card in it, just the same as a computer search warrant authorizes the search of the hard drive: “Such reasoning is analogous to the instant matter. For one, a micro SD card and external hard drive are substantially similar and functionally the same. Both are storage devices that can be separated from other digital devices and transported. Both are solely used to store digital data. Both are ‘functionally inoperable—and their contents unreviewable—when unplugged from a’ digital device. Beckmann, 786 F.3d at 679. Accordingly, an external hard drive is nearly identical to a micro SD card. Moreover, in the Eighth Circuit a cell phone is equivalent to a computer under the sentencing guidelines. United States v. Kramer, 631 F.3d 900, 902-03 (8th Cir. 2011).” There was also probable cause for search of the phone. United States v. Wilson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166318 (W.D. Mo. Sept. 16, 2019).

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: SW for cell phone includes its SD card, just as a computer SW includes the hard drive

KS: Words spoken on one’s curtilage heard off the property are not protected by the 4A

Defendant was convicted of violating an order of protection for speaking disparagingly about the other person. She made the comment from her curtilage to her husband but loud enough to be heard across the street where the other person lived. She has no Fourth Amendment protection from that. She does, however, have a valid point that the no contact order violates prior restraint. State v. Smith, 2019 Kan. App. LEXIS 66 (Sept. 27, 2019).

There was reasonable suspicion for stop of defendants on a bank robbery report. While they lacked outerwear matching the description of the robbers, they were in the vicinity in short sleeves on December 29th in Eastern Pennsylvania when it was cold and wet. Other factors made the totality of circumstances. United States v. Scott, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166358 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 26, 2019).*

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: Words spoken on one’s curtilage heard off the property are not protected by the 4A

OH2: Road rage: Panicked driver’s pointing out car that pointed gun justified stop under Navarette and Long permitted protective search for weapon

“Based upon the informant’s face-to-face, contemporaneous, and panicked report of a startling event (the waving of a gun in the vehicle directly behind Underwood’s cruiser), we conclude that the informant’s tip was reliable. This reliability allowed Underwood ‘to credit the [informant’s] allegation’ that the driver of the vehicle positioned directly behind his cruiser had been waving a gun. See Navarette at 399. Given this, the stop was a proper investigative stop under the Fourth Amendment and under Terry v. Ohio, ….” The protective search of the car was valid under Michigan v. Long. State v. Cook, 2019-Ohio-3918, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3996 (2d Dist. Sept. 27, 2019).

Defendant was already parked on a truck stop parking lot when he was encountered for suspicion of patronizing prostitutes. A frisk led to plain feel of drugs, and the frisk was reasonable. State v. Purley, 2019-Ohio-3931, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4003 (6th Dist. Sept. 27, 2019).*

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Road rage: Panicked driver’s pointing out car that pointed gun justified stop under Navarette and Long permitted protective search for weapon

LA: Two Rodriguez violations: car searched for weapon without RS then female officer called for a body search

Defendant was detained unreasonably without reasonable suspicion and then her car was searched for a weapon but none was found. Then the detaining officer called for a female officer to conduct a search of her person. “Because reasonable suspicion was lacking, the deputy’s announcement that a female officer was in route to perform a pat-down of defendant constituted a threat to conduct an unlawful search under the Fourth Amendment, as the deputy had no authority to do a pat-down without a warrant.” State v. Ellis, 2019 La. LEXIS 2340 (Sept. 24, 2019).

The CI wasn’t corroborated. “Although the Affidavit established CS-1’s basis of knowledge, it offered little regarding CS-1’s reliability or how the HSI agents sought to corroborate his information. It is, therefore, a close question as to whether the Affidavit established probable cause. The Court, however, need not resolve this issue because, as explained below, the fruits of the search are admissible under the good-faith exception.” United States v. Rocha-Gomez, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165757 (S.D. N.Y. Sept. 26, 2019).*

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA: Two Rodriguez violations: car searched for weapon without RS then female officer called for a body search

Courthouse News Service: Judge Blocks ICE From Using Flawed Databases to Detain Immigrants

Courthouse News Service: Judge Blocks ICE From Using Flawed Databases to Detain Immigrants by Jon Parton:
Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on Courthouse News Service: Judge Blocks ICE From Using Flawed Databases to Detain Immigrants

Forbes: Do Food Trucks Have Fourth Amendment Rights? Supreme Court Could Decide In Chicago GPS Tracker Case

Forbes: Do Food Trucks Have Fourth Amendment Rights? Supreme Court Could Decide In Chicago GPS Tracker Case by Nick Sibilla:
Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on Forbes: Do Food Trucks Have Fourth Amendment Rights? Supreme Court Could Decide In Chicago GPS Tracker Case

Forbes: Sleeper Supreme Court Case Could Make Suing Rogue Federal Agents Almost Impossible

Forbes: Sleeper Supreme Court Case Could Make Suing Rogue Federal Agents Almost Impossible by Nick Sibilla:
Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Forbes: Sleeper Supreme Court Case Could Make Suing Rogue Federal Agents Almost Impossible

KY: No right to advice of DUI rights in Spanish

“On the strength of Rhodes, we hold law enforcement officers satisfy KRS 189A.105(2), which requires a suspected drunk driver be ‘informed’ of specific rights and consequences associated with Kentucky’s implied consent law as expressed in KRS 189A.103, by reading the warning aloud in English to the suspect. There being no statutory requirement for the suspect to understand the implied consent warning, there is no requirement it be provided to him in his native tongue. Because of Bedway, even if Ortiz’ statutory rights were violated, suppression of his BAC result was not mandatory.” Commonwealth ex rel. Logan County Atty. v. Williams, 2019 Ky. App. LEXIS 167 (Sept. 20, 2019). [Doesn’t this violate equal protection by conditioning rights on national origin or language choice of native born Americans?]

The officer had probable cause to arrest defendant for obstructing official business, and that justified the search of his person and his backpack. State v. Lee, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3983 (10th Dist. Sept. 26, 2019).*

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on KY: No right to advice of DUI rights in Spanish

OH10: Post-conviction petition alleging Franks violation has to be factually specific

Defendant in his post-conviction petition doesn’t show sufficient falsity to undermine the search warrant. State v. Edwards, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3977 (10th Dist. Sept. 26, 2019).*

Factual disputes preclude appeal of a denial of qualified immunity to a police officer in an excessive force case. Campbell v. Johannes, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 29135 (8th Cir. Sept. 23, 2019).*
http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/19/09/183129U.pdf

Defendant’s CSLI was properly obtained by court order and can’t form the basis of a 2255. McNeal v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165425 (D. Md. Sept. 20, 2019).*

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OH10: Post-conviction petition alleging Franks violation has to be factually specific

D.Minn.: A laptop stolen to turn it over to the police could be used as evidence

Defendant’s laptop was stolen for the purpose of turning it over to the police who accessed it by search warrant. The person who took it was not acting as a government agent, and it’s clear since Burdeau (1921) that this doesn’t preclude the use of the laptop as evidence. United States v. Mays, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165597 (D. Minn. Sept. 20, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on D.Minn.: A laptop stolen to turn it over to the police could be used as evidence

D.N.M.: It’s not a Franks violation to fail to mention any deals with the CI; it’s assumed

“Second, as to Mr. Ramos-Castillo’s argument that Agent Godier omitted material information by failing to include law enforcement’s numerous promises to Mr. Salazar, the Court finds that the failure to explicitly include this information does not amount to material omission that would vitiate probable cause. … Furthermore, the Tenth Circuit has noted that judges issuing search warrants ‘often know, even without an explicit discussion of criminal history, that many confidential informants suffer from generally unsavory character and may only be assisting police to avoid prosecution for their own crimes.’” The CI was corroborated enough to show probable cause. United States v. Ramos-Castillo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165009 (D.N.M. Sept. 26, 2019).

There was probable cause for defendant’s stop and search based on collective knowledge of the police. United States v. Pardo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165016 (D. Me. Sept. 26, 2019).*

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.N.M.: It’s not a Franks violation to fail to mention any deals with the CI; it’s assumed

WA grants automatic standing to a car thief but finds inventory of the car reasonable

“We are asked to answer two questions under article I, section 7 of our state constitution: first, whether defendants have standing to challenge the scope of a warrantless inventory search of a vehicle when that vehicle is stolen and, second, whether a proper inventory search extends to opening an innocuous, unlocked container of unknown ownership found in a stolen vehicle associated with defendants who were apprehended while burglarizing a home. We hold that the defendants have automatic standing to challenge the search and that the search of the innocuous container was lawful under these circumstances. We reverse the Court of Appeals and uphold the denial of the motion to suppress.” State v. Peck, 2019 Wash. LEXIS 589 (Sept. 26, 2019).

Posted in Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on WA grants automatic standing to a car thief but finds inventory of the car reasonable

OH4: Heien good faith mistake of fact doesn’t apply to a stop under a completely inapplicable ordinance

Defendant’s stop was unreasonable, and Heien’s good faith mistake of fact doesn’t apply. The city code provision dealt with turning at intersections, and the officer stopped defendant for turning into a driveway which is not an “intersection.” State v. Ware, 2019-Ohio-3885, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3954 (4th Dist. Sept. 23, 2019).

Defendant didn’t properly preserve his state constitutional claim in the trial court, only alluding to it, and didn’t really address it until it got here. It’s treated as waived. Commonwealth v. Bishop, 2019 Pa. LEXIS 5446 (Sept. 26, 2019) [Fifth Amendment claim, but instructive.]

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonableness, State constitution | Comments Off on OH4: Heien good faith mistake of fact doesn’t apply to a stop under a completely inapplicable ordinance

CA6: Police get QI for coming to take ptf in for a mental exam but electing instead to arrest

Police were called to plaintiff’s house because he was barricaded in a closet with a gun threatening to kill himself. When police arrived, he was ultimately taken in for alleged crimes, for which he was later acquitted. The officers get qualified immunity for their actions, even if mistaken on the question of probable cause for seizure for a mental exam based on the detailed report of a family member. When they got there, however, he was calm. Also, there was “no robust consensus of authority” [Wesby] that the officers did anything wrong. Dolbin v. Miller, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 29040 (6th Cir. Sept. 26, 2019).*

The District Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims for seizure of personal property because there was no Fourth Amendment violation. [No facts whatsoever are given.] Marutyan v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep’t, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28980 (9th Cir. Sept. 25, 2019).*

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Police get QI for coming to take ptf in for a mental exam but electing instead to arrest