Monthly Archives: September 2020

CA5: Search for ptf’s ID was reasonable when she refused to ID self and was charged with obstruction

The search of plaintiff’s wallet for her ID was reasonable when she refused to identify herself when stalled on an interstate highway. A search of the car for her wallet and then the search of the wallet was thus reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Search incident | Comments Off on CA5: Search for ptf’s ID was reasonable when she refused to ID self and was charged with obstruction

PA: Warrantless entry for mental health check unjustified for lack of danger

The warrantless police entry into defendant’s home for a mental health check wasn’t justified by the facts because of a lack of danger. The plain view is suppressed for lack of a proper view. Commonwealth v. Schneider, 2020 Pa. Super. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on PA: Warrantless entry for mental health check unjustified for lack of danger

CA10: Ptf didn’t have to show officer his ID and that wasn’t PC for arrest

“Mglej’s refusal to provide Deputy Gardner with his driver’s license or some other form of identification, then, as Deputy Gardner demanded, did not create probable cause to arrest Mglej under Utah Code § 76-8-301.5(1). Thus, sufficient to defeat summary judgment, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Ptf didn’t have to show officer his ID and that wasn’t PC for arrest

CA3: State court suppression of search isn’t favorable termination for malicious prosecution case

Just because the evidence was suppressed in plaintiff’s criminal case and then affirmed on appeal doesn’t mean the criminal case was terminated in his favor on the facts. He possessed heroin, and that’s not in dispute, and there was probable … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: State court suppression of search isn’t favorable termination for malicious prosecution case

CNET: Warrant canary: What you need to know about this online privacy warning sign

CNET: Warrant canary: What you need to know about this online privacy warning sign by Rae Hodge (“Some companies still use warrant canaries to warn customers of threats to their privacy by US government subpoenas. But the legal waters remain … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CNET: Warrant canary: What you need to know about this online privacy warning sign

E.D.Cal.: Chain of custody after execution of a SW isn’t a 2255 ground

Chain of custody after execution of a search warrant isn’t a 2255 ground. It’s a trial issue that was waived and only goes to credibility of evidence for the jury. United States v. Smith, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163635 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Chain of custody after execution of a SW isn’t a 2255 ground

WA: Ruse text messages with known contact violated state REP

A ruse police text message exchange with defendant with one of his known contacts violated his reasonable expectation of privacy under the state constitution’s right of privacy. State v. Bowman, 2020 Wash. App. LEXIS 2463 (Sept. 8, 2020):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Ruse text messages with known contact violated state REP

Techdirt: Government’s ‘Reverse’ Warrant Rejected By Two Consecutive Federal Judges

Techdirt: Government’s ‘Reverse’ Warrant Rejected By Two Consecutive Federal Judges by Tim Cushing (“Warrants are supposed to have a certain amount of particularity. These warrants have none. All they have are some coordinates and a clock. Fortunately, as the EFF … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on Techdirt: Government’s ‘Reverse’ Warrant Rejected By Two Consecutive Federal Judges

CA7: Civil claim for false arrest or detention on fabricated evidence is 4A claim

“A claim for false arrest or pretrial detention based on fabricated evidence sounds in the Fourth Amendment right to be free from seizure without probable cause.” Patrick v. City of Chicago, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 28380 (7th Cir. Sept. 8, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: Civil claim for false arrest or detention on fabricated evidence is 4A claim

CA3: Postal inspector had RS to detain package for dog sniff

“The [postal] inspector had reasonable suspicion. [¶] The inspector acted reasonably. Five signs aroused his suspicion: First, the package was from Puerto Rico, a common source of illegal cocaine shipments. Second, the package was sent by Priority Mail, a common … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Postal inspector had RS to detain package for dog sniff

CA9: Neighbor’s 911 call about burglary justified police entry protective sweep

A 911 burglary call by defendant’s neighbor led to police coming to the house, and the police entered to look for suspects. This was a reasonable entry based on exigency. United States v. Booth, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 28377 (9th … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Neighbor’s 911 call about burglary justified police entry protective sweep

Vice: Faulty Facial Recognition Led to His Arrest—Now He’s Suing

Vice: Faulty Facial Recognition Led to His Arrest—Now He’s Suing by Natalie O’Neill (“Michael Oliver is the second Black man found to be wrongfully arrested by Detroit police because of the technology—and his lawyers suspect there are many more.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Vice: Faulty Facial Recognition Led to His Arrest—Now He’s Suing

Reason: Did the Ninth Circuit Create a New Fourth Amendment Notice Requirement for Surveillance Practices?

Reason: Did the Ninth Circuit Create a New Fourth Amendment Notice Requirement for Surveillance Practices? by Orin S. Kerr (“An overlooked part of United States v. Moalin could have a major impact on surveillance law.”)

Posted in FISA, National security | Comments Off on Reason: Did the Ninth Circuit Create a New Fourth Amendment Notice Requirement for Surveillance Practices?

D.Ariz.: No REP in one’s criminal history from examination

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in an inmate’s criminal history search that led to a detainer. Brink v. Herron, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162680 (D. Ariz. Aug. 7, 2020). Defendant’s application for a successor 2255 based on defense … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No REP in one’s criminal history from examination

CA6: Police dog biting handcuffed, prone, and nonresisting arrest is excessive force

A police dog bit plaintiff while he was handcuffed and on the ground. That’s excessive force if a jury believes it was gratuitous. Qualified immunity denied. Hammond v. County of Oakland, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 28285 (9th Cir. Sept. 4, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA6: Police dog biting handcuffed, prone, and nonresisting arrest is excessive force

CA2: Arguable PC to arrest makes it valid

“Because the defendants had at least arguable probable cause to arrest Barnes for an open container violation, the search was also lawful. A search incident to arrest is lawful where the officer reasonably believed he had probable cause, regardless of … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on CA2: Arguable PC to arrest makes it valid

AK: Aerial surveillance of a residential backyard to photograph it with a telephoto lens violates the state constitution

Aerial surveillance of a residential backyard to photograph it with a telephoto lens violates the Alaska Constitution where the landowner took precautions to protect his privacy at ground-level. McKelvey v. State, 2020 Alas. App. LEXIS 71 (Sept. 4, 2020):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on AK: Aerial surveillance of a residential backyard to photograph it with a telephoto lens violates the state constitution

IL: Mistaken application of unambiguous statute not a Heien reasonable mistake of law

“Kinsella misinterpreted an unambiguous statute, thereby committing an unreasonable mistake of law. See Gaytan, 2015 IL 116223, ¶ 45; see also United States v. Stanbridge, 813 F.3d 1032, 1037-38 (7th Cir. 2016) (‘[The officer] simply was wrong about what the … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: Mistaken application of unambiguous statute not a Heien reasonable mistake of law

CT: No justification for welfare check entry; and then they waited an hour to enter

The trial court erroneously held that there was an objective basis for finding probable cause to enter defendant’s apartment for a welfare check. There wasn’t. There had been an altercation in the laundry room. The fact his car was parked … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CT: No justification for welfare check entry; and then they waited an hour to enter

AR: No REP in camera planted in someone else’s bedroom

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a camera planted for video voyeurism in someone else’s bedroom. Powell v. State, 2020 Ark. App. 371, 2020 Ark. App. LEXIS 416 (Sept. 2, 2020):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on AR: No REP in camera planted in someone else’s bedroom