Daily Archives: September 4, 2020

FL1: Foregone conclusion exception applies to compelling def’s cell phone password

The foregone conclusion exception applies to compelling defendant’s cell phone password, thus distinguishing Pollard v. State, 287 So. 3d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019). Varn v. State, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 12478 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept. 3, 2020):

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on FL1: Foregone conclusion exception applies to compelling def’s cell phone password

CA10: Where wrong standard of review applied below, undisputed facts allow appellate court to still decide

“Because the evidence presented by the government at the evidentiary hearing in this case was largely undisputed, we conclude that the district court’s factual findings were not clearly erroneous, and that its misapplication of the standard of review does not … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA10: Where wrong standard of review applied below, undisputed facts allow appellate court to still decide

D.D.C.: Strip search class rejected for no limit to lack of RS

Plaintiff’s proposed arrestee strip search class definition is denied for not limiting it to those strip searched without reasonable suspicion. Lewis v. District of Columbia, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160706 (D. D.C. Sept. 3, 2020):

Posted in Strip search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Strip search class rejected for no limit to lack of RS

CA11: No QI for killing decedent for trying to grab Taser to stop Tasering

“This fatal shooting ‘lies so obviously at the very core of what the Fourth Amendment prohibits that the unlawfulness of the conduct was readily apparent’ even without a prior case on point.” No qualified immunity. Cantu v. City of Dothan, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: No QI for killing decedent for trying to grab Taser to stop Tasering

CA5: Bivens not extended to excessive force claim on entering VA hospital

Bivens won’t be extended to an alleged unprovoked attack at a VA hospital metal detector. Oliva v. Nivar, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 28052 (5th Cir. Sept. 2, 2020). “The issue before the Court is whether the Government violated Rule 16 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: Bivens not extended to excessive force claim on entering VA hospital

CA5: RS required for border search of digital devices

Based on some other circuits, digital forensic searches require at least reasonable suspicion and no warrant. Defendant’s digital search complied with the rules of other circuits, so it was at least in good faith. United States v. Aguilar, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: RS required for border search of digital devices