Daily Archives: September 11, 2020

CA5: Mistaken identity arrest for half brother with same name gets QI

Plaintiff’s case for a mistaken identity arrest when his half-brother with the same name was the target fails on qualified immunity. Baker v. McCollan, 443 U.S. 137 (1979) is close enough to show qualified immunity. Nerio v. Derekevans, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Mistaken identity arrest for half brother with same name gets QI

E.D.Mo.: Claim that stop was racially biased fails on merits

Defendant’s equal protection claim that his stop was racially motivated fails on the merits because there was a factual basis for the stop and the claim of racial bias has no evidentiary support. His effort to put the officer’s social … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Claim that stop was racially biased fails on merits

D.Idaho: Dep’t of Fish & Game checkpoint was reasonable

The Idaho Dep’t of Fish & Game division’s wildlife checkpoint here was reasonable under all the circumstances. Plaintiff wasn’t a hunter and his stop would have resulted in one question and he’d have been on his way. Tanner v. Schriever, … Continue reading

Posted in Chekpoints, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Dep’t of Fish & Game checkpoint was reasonable

CA5: Alleged violations of the Posse Comitatus Act must be “widespread and repeated” to justify suppression

Alleged violations of the Posse Comitatus Act, here by AFOSI, must be “widespread and repeated” to justify suppression. Defendant didn’t show this was. United States v. Salinas, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 28616 (5th Cir. Sept. 9, 2020). “A detective assigned … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA5: Alleged violations of the Posse Comitatus Act must be “widespread and repeated” to justify suppression

CA9: Unjustified emergency entry didn’t become justified by learning of a supervised release search waiver

The officers’ warrantless entry into defendant’s home thinking he needed emergency assistance wasn’t justified. They took him out. They found he had a supervised release search waiver on file which they didn’t know about before. They reentered and searched under … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Unjustified emergency entry didn’t become justified by learning of a supervised release search waiver

Cal.2d: New crime during alleged illegal detention won’t be suppressed

Defendant’s new crime during alleged illegal detention will not be suppressed. Here, he doesn’t even plead enough to get a hearing. People v. Chavez, 2020 Cal. App. LEXIS 858 (2d Dist. Sept. 10, 2020). There was a substantial basis for … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.2d: New crime during alleged illegal detention won’t be suppressed