Daily Archives: September 20, 2020

NJLJ: Analysis: Give Us Your Cell Phone Password and Constitutional Rights, Please

NJLJ: Analysis: Give Us Your Cell Phone Password and Constitutional Rights, Please by Louis Locascio (“The issue, of first impression, was whether requiring a defendant to disclose the passcode of his cell phone violates his protection against self-incrimination provided by … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on NJLJ: Analysis: Give Us Your Cell Phone Password and Constitutional Rights, Please

CT Tax & Admin.: Order to DoC employees to search their cell phones for public records was excessive

An agency order to employees to search their personal cell phones for copies of public records is in excess of agency authority. Comm’r of the Dep’t of Corr. v. Freedom of Info. Comm’n, 2020 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1004 (Tax & … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CT Tax & Admin.: Order to DoC employees to search their cell phones for public records was excessive

N.D.N.Y.: Mere disagreement with state court 4A determination still bars habeas review

Defendant had his opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim in state court, and that bars habeas relief. Mere disagreement isn’t enough under Stone. Smith v. Superintendent, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171480 (N.D. N.Y. Sept. 17, 2020)*:

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Mere disagreement with state court 4A determination still bars habeas review

E.D.N.C.: Removing protective sweep from affidavit for SW still leaves PC

While protective sweep was unreasonable, excising it from the affidavit for search warrant, still leaves probable cause. United States v. Lee, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171270 (E.D. N.C. Sept. 18, 2020). “In sum, counsel reasonably could have concluded that movant … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep, Uncategorized | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Removing protective sweep from affidavit for SW still leaves PC