Monthly Archives: April 2019

DE: Vague CI information and lack of nexus to def’s home required suppression

There was no substantial basis for a finding of probable cause for this search warrant. Not only were the credibility and reliability of the informant questionable, but the tip was overly broad and made no mention of defendant’s residence and … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on DE: Vague CI information and lack of nexus to def’s home required suppression

S.D.Fla.: Generically describing in an inventory “tools” and “misc items” was constitutionally adequate to show true inventory

Describing a lot of stuff in defendant’s car as “tools” and “misc items” was good enough. “Officer Jas also testified that having the inventory search recorded in his BWC served to verify the accuracy of his paperwork. Having considered Officer … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Generically describing in an inventory “tools” and “misc items” was constitutionally adequate to show true inventory

New Law Review Article: Contracting for Fourth Amendment Privacy Online

New Law Review Article: Contracting for Fourth Amendment Privacy Online by Wayne A. Logan & Jake Linford, Minnesota Law Review, Forthcoming: Abstract:

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Contracting for Fourth Amendment Privacy Online

LA1: Plain view during a probation “compliance check” is valid

Plain view during a probation “compliance check” is valid. State v. Cheramie, 2019 La. App. LEXIS 576 (La. App. 1 Cir. Apr. 5, 2019). Defense counsel filed a motion to suppress which was heard and denied. He then pled guilty. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on LA1: Plain view during a probation “compliance check” is valid

OH8: When on probation for bestiality, the Humane Society can conduct probation searches

Defendant was on misdemeanor probation for bestiality with a dog. He was subject to probation searches on reasonable suspicion for whether or not he had pets in the house, and the Animal Protection League (APL) is a part of the … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH8: When on probation for bestiality, the Humane Society can conduct probation searches

CA6: Rule against warrantless housing inspection entries clearly established

Defendant police officers were properly granted summary judgment on plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claims regarding the validity of the warrants because probable cause supported two of the warrants and the third warrant was not so lacking in indicia of probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Rule against warrantless housing inspection entries clearly established

S.D.N.Y.: SW over use of Instragram justifies SW for cell phone as source

Defendant’s alleged use of Instagram justifies a search warrant for his cell phone as the source of the usage. United States v. Sosa, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58467 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. 5, 2019):

Posted in Cell phones, Social media warrants | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: SW over use of Instragram justifies SW for cell phone as source

N.D.Ga.: Email tip to Swiss authorities that defs were coming by plane with cocaine wasn’t enough to make the US agents of Switzerland

“Second, Defendants assert that HSI agents ‘were substantially involved’ in the search and seizure by Swiss officials based solely upon an email that was sent by a HSI special agent to the Swiss police alerting them to the fact that … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Email tip to Swiss authorities that defs were coming by plane with cocaine wasn’t enough to make the US agents of Switzerland

OH2: Denial of motion for return of property affirmed on appeal for lack of a hearing transcript

Defendant’s motion for return of property was properly denied, but it’s because he failed to bring up a record of the hearing in the trial court. State v. White, 2019-Ohio-1264, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 1342 (2d Cir. Apr. 5, 2019).* … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH2: Denial of motion for return of property affirmed on appeal for lack of a hearing transcript

N.D.Miss.: There’s no right to counsel during execution of a SW where defendant isn’t arrested and being questioned

“Mr. Pillault also argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because he had no counsel present when his home was searched. This claim is simply frivolous.” Pillault v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58295 (N.D. Miss. Apr. 4, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: There’s no right to counsel during execution of a SW where defendant isn’t arrested and being questioned

IN: Petition for return of firearms seized granted; state’s evidence too stale to carry burden

In a petition for return of firearms seized from an alleged dangerous person, the state didn’t put on proof of anything recent, so the petition should have been granted. Redington v. State, 2019 Ind. App. LEXIS 146 (Apr. 5, 2019). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on IN: Petition for return of firearms seized granted; state’s evidence too stale to carry burden

CA2: Failure to make an offer of proof in motion to suppress means denial of the motion

“For starters, Ferrer was not entitled to a hearing on his motion to suppress. The motion, filed by counsel, was unaccompanied by any affidavit to support the charge that Ferrer was subjected to ‘an unlawful police-initiated interrogation.’ Gov’t App’x 2. … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA2: Failure to make an offer of proof in motion to suppress means denial of the motion

WI: Exclusionary rule applies to forfeiture actions; remanded for determination of GFE

The exclusionary rule applies to forfeiture actions under 1958 Plymouth Sedan; however, the state gets to argue and develop a record on remand that the good faith exception applies. State v. Scott, 2019 Wisc. App. LEXIS 191 (Apr. 4, 2019). … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Exclusionary rule applies to forfeiture actions; remanded for determination of GFE

S.D.Cal.: Fire call about structure fire was erroneous, and further entry into backyard was unreasonable

The San Diego County Fire Department got a call about a structure fire. When they arrived, it turned out to be a small fire in a brush pile in defendant’s backyard that was virtually out. The exigency dissipated and it … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Fire call about structure fire was erroneous, and further entry into backyard was unreasonable

M.D.Pa.: State law was more protective than the 4A when the case was in state court, but it doesn’t apply in federal court

While state law was more protective of privacy rights and this case started as a state investigation, state law would not be applied to the motion to suppress the search. Only federal law applies. United States v. Capozzi, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Choice of law, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: State law was more protective than the 4A when the case was in state court, but it doesn’t apply in federal court

MO: No REP in third-party communications with Google and Craiglist

Defendant “fails to demonstrate that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the communications he voluntarily delivered to unknown third parties using Google and Craigslist.” State v. Demark, 2019 Mo. App. LEXIS 446 (Apr. 2, 2019). The search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MO: No REP in third-party communications with Google and Craiglist

E.D.Wis.: Arresting def and family during raid at gunpoint and taking him outside to talk was still custodial; family inside in handcuffs

Defendant’s house was raided by police at gunpoint and then had everybody in the house in handcuffs and wouldn’t let a mother tend to her crying child in another room. Defendant was unhandcuffed and taken outside to talk. “Defendant was … Continue reading

Posted in Custody | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Arresting def and family during raid at gunpoint and taking him outside to talk was still custodial; family inside in handcuffs

DE: Nolo plea after suppression denied was collateral estoppel to civil case over search

Plaintiff’s nolo plea after his motion to suppress was denied was collateral estoppel to his civil case over the arrest involving the same issue. Rogers v. Morgan, 2019 Del. LEXIS 160 (Apr. 2, 2019). When the officer asked for consent … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent | Comments Off on DE: Nolo plea after suppression denied was collateral estoppel to civil case over search

CA1: SCA emergency request for Kik app customer info didn’t implicate Carpenter concerns

The government used an emergency application for user data from the Kik app after learning that defendant was allegedly sending child pornography to children through it. The information was nowhere near the quality and intrusiveness of the information in Carpenter, … Continue reading

Posted in Stored Communications Act, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA1: SCA emergency request for Kik app customer info didn’t implicate Carpenter concerns

E.D.Mich.: Health care fraud SW also reached def’s home because related mail was received there

In a health care fraud case, the fact some mail within the scheme came to defendant’s home was nexus for the search warrant including the home. “All of the items identified in the indictment were tied to or related to … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Health care fraud SW also reached def’s home because related mail was received there