OH2: Denial of motion for return of property affirmed on appeal for lack of a hearing transcript

Defendant’s motion for return of property was properly denied, but it’s because he failed to bring up a record of the hearing in the trial court. State v. White, 2019-Ohio-1264, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 1342 (2d Cir. Apr. 5, 2019).*

“Bailey also initially brought claims under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, alleging unreasonable searches of his cell and unlawful seizure of his property. The district court dismissed both claims at screening because a prisoner has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell ….” He waived it an appeal by not adequately briefing it. Bailey v. Stover, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 10100 (7th Cir. Apr. 5, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.