Monthly Archives: August 2018

CA7: Searching wrong apt on ambiguous SW (apt 1 where there were 1A & 1B) gets qualified immunity here

When the officer arrived at plaintiff’s address with a search warrant for apartment 1, he instead found apartments 1A and 1B. The officers attempted to clear up the ambiguity before the search, and they searched 1A finding nothing, and the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Particularity, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: Searching wrong apt on ambiguous SW (apt 1 where there were 1A & 1B) gets qualified immunity here

N.D.W.Va.: A motion to suppress isn’t moot just because the govt says it won’t use the evidence in its case-in-chief; if it will to impeach, then the issue has to be resolved

Government’s agreeing it wouldn’t use the product of a search in its case in chief does not make it moot unless the government also says it won’t use it in impeachment. Then, it can only be used against the defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: A motion to suppress isn’t moot just because the govt says it won’t use the evidence in its case-in-chief; if it will to impeach, then the issue has to be resolved

N.D.Cal.: The fact California has legalized recreational marijuana does not make the smell of marijuana in a car no longer PC

The fact California has legalized recreational marijuana for small amounts does not make the smell of marijuana no longer probable cause. Here, there was a strong odor and defendant admitting he was carrying. An ounce or more would be an … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: The fact California has legalized recreational marijuana does not make the smell of marijuana in a car no longer PC

W.D.Ark.: Sexually explicit Facebook chats from home IP address is PC for the home

Defense counsel couldn’t be ineffective for not challenging the search of defendant’s apartment because there was probable cause. Sexually explicit Facebook chats with a minor from one’s home IP address is probable cause for the home. United States v. Ram, … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Sexually explicit Facebook chats from home IP address is PC for the home

VA, concurring: State statute may provide exclusion where 4A doesn’t

The prior appeal was law of the case on application of exigent circumstances to justify the search. Campbell v. State, 294 Va. 486, 807 S.E.2d 735 (2017). On remand, defendant claimed another version of how the search was invalid because, … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on VA, concurring: State statute may provide exclusion where 4A doesn’t

CA9: Excessive search of car 20 years ago was relevant to show officer “would have taken any means necessary to secure” plaintiff’s wrongful conviction

Plaintiffs were actually innocent of murder and served 20 years in prison before securing habeas relief for knowing Brady violations. They sued the police officer responsible for their conviction for clear Brady violations in withholding exculpatory information. As a part … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA9: Excessive search of car 20 years ago was relevant to show officer “would have taken any means necessary to secure” plaintiff’s wrongful conviction

WaPo: In horrifying detail, women accuse U.S. customs officers of invasive body searches

WaPo: In horrifying detail, women accuse U.S. customs officers of invasive body searches by Susan Ferriss, Center for Public Integrity:

Posted in Body searches, Border search | Comments Off on WaPo: In horrifying detail, women accuse U.S. customs officers of invasive body searches

CA5: Microsoft’s checking photos uploaded to cloud for CP is a private search

Defendant uploaded child pornography to Microsoft’s Skydrive. Microsoft runs all pictures’ hash values against known child pornography. Finding some, it reported it to law enforcement. This was purely a private search. United States v. Reddick, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 23012 … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: Microsoft’s checking photos uploaded to cloud for CP is a private search

S.D.Cal.: Cell phone was validly searched under border search exception; obtaining passcode was likely unlawful, but government isn’t going to use it

Defendant was arrested at Calexico for importing meth. While in the holding cell, she gave up the password for the cell phone. The government isn’t going to use her revealing the password as evidence, but it wants to use the … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Cell phone was validly searched under border search exception; obtaining passcode was likely unlawful, but government isn’t going to use it

SC: Refusal to sign a second consent form wasn’t withdrawal of the first consent

Defendant signed a consent to search form and a search occurred. Later, the police asked him to execute it again so they could look for firearms, but he refused. They searched anyway. The first consent included the firearms, and refusal … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on SC: Refusal to sign a second consent form wasn’t withdrawal of the first consent

LA2: CSLI obtained by SW before Carpenter: Observation

Court notes in passing in a final footnote that the CSLI here was obtained by warrant before Carpenter and it’s not an issue. State v. Lynn, 2018 La. App. LEXIS 1567 (La. App. 2 Cir. Aug. 15, 2018). Note: It’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on LA2: CSLI obtained by SW before Carpenter: Observation

LA Times: ‘Technical error’ blamed for recordings of more than 1,000 attorney-inmate phone calls in O.C. jail

LA Times: ‘Technical error’ blamed for recordings of more than 1,000 attorney-inmate phone calls in O.C. jail by Hannah Fry:

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on LA Times: ‘Technical error’ blamed for recordings of more than 1,000 attorney-inmate phone calls in O.C. jail

WaPo: ICE arrested a wanted man driving his pregnant wife to give birth. She drove herself to the hospital.

WaPo: ICE arrested a wanted man driving his pregnant wife to give birth. She drove herself to the hospital. by Alex Horton: ICE said the man, a Mexican national living illegally in the United States, is wanted in his home … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on WaPo: ICE arrested a wanted man driving his pregnant wife to give birth. She drove herself to the hospital.

CA4: Ptf’s 1983 claim a Stingray was used on him survives Heck bar

Plaintiff’s claim that he was the subject of unlawful surveillance with a Stingray survives a Heck challenge and can proceed. Marcantoni v. Bealefeld, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 22798 (4th Cir. Aug. 16, 2018):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell site simulators | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf’s 1983 claim a Stingray was used on him survives Heck bar

M.D.Ala.: Unmarked pill bottle with apparent crack in it was in plain view during protective sweep after arrest in house

Officers came in defendant’s house with an arrest warrant for cocaine delivery. During a protective sweep, an unmarked pill bottle was seen and picked up. It was immediately apparent to the officers that the contents was likely crack cocaine and … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Unmarked pill bottle with apparent crack in it was in plain view during protective sweep after arrest in house

CA11: Plea to indictment without plea agreement isn’t conditional plea

Defendant’s plea to the indictment without a plea agreement didn’t preserve any appeal issues. Thus, there was no conditional plea. United States v. Thomas, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 22594 (11th Cir. Aug. 15, 2018). The Immigration Judge found that the … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on CA11: Plea to indictment without plea agreement isn’t conditional plea

CA5: SW was not for all business records, just types of employment records and it was particular enough

Defendant was convicted of encouraging illegal aliens to remain in the United States. A search warrant for his business sought types of employment records, and it was not overly broad. “[G]eneric language is permissible if it particularizes the types of … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on CA5: SW was not for all business records, just types of employment records and it was particular enough

MN: Apt building common hallway not curtilage under Jardines for dog sniff

Dog sniff in the common hallway of an apartment building wasn’t unreasonable because it’s not curtilage under Jardines. State v. Edstrom, 2018 Minn. LEXIS 446 (Aug. 15, 2018). There was nexus: “Here, the investigating officer had significant experience. The officer … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Nexus | Comments Off on MN: Apt building common hallway not curtilage under Jardines for dog sniff

D.Kan.: Arrest for possession of cash wasn’t even reasonably valid under state law; exclusionary rule applies in federal court

Defendant was stopped, and the officer gave a warning. He continued asking questions which led to a consent search finding cash. The officer then arrested defendants for possession of the proceeds of a drug transaction. Only there were no probable … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Arrest for possession of cash wasn’t even reasonably valid under state law; exclusionary rule applies in federal court

TX1: Pill bottle in pocket wasn’t presumed to contain contraband; plain feel not valid

Defendant admits that he was validly stopped and patted down. The only question is whether the pill bottle removed from his pocket was subject to plain feel, and the court concludes it was not. It was obviously not a weapon, … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on TX1: Pill bottle in pocket wasn’t presumed to contain contraband; plain feel not valid