Monthly Archives: July 2018

OR: State can’t be compelled to issue SW to Google to help defense case

Defendant was accused of the rape of J. The defense learned that she kept a journal on Google, and the defense sought to get it by subpoena from Google under the Stored Communications Act. There were hearings and the state … Continue reading

Posted in Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on OR: State can’t be compelled to issue SW to Google to help defense case

D.Minn.: USMJ’s order to disclose all CIs is overbroad; not if they aren’t trial witnesses

The USMJ’s order to disclose all information about the informants was overbroad because it included informant’s who are not trial witnesses. It is limited to those who are trial witnesses. United States v. Bias, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112605 (D. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: USMJ’s order to disclose all CIs is overbroad; not if they aren’t trial witnesses

N.D.Cal.: Cell-site simulator requires SW; state law doesn’t permit federal officers to execute state SW

(1) The government’s disclaiming a critical fact in the affidavit for search warrant undermines the probable cause vitiating the warrant. (2) “Use of a cell-site simulator requires a warrant. See United States v. Ellis, 270 F. Supp. 3d 1134, 1141-46 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site simulators, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Cell-site simulator requires SW; state law doesn’t permit federal officers to execute state SW

D.Nev.: While def’s firearm was suppressed, it can come in by impeachment if he opens the door at trial

Defendant’s firearm was previously suppressed. If at trial he opens the door to the gun, it can be referred to by proper impeachment. United States v. Casarez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112536 (D. Nev. July 6, 2018). Defendant was granted … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.Nev.: While def’s firearm was suppressed, it can come in by impeachment if he opens the door at trial

WI: SI to arrest warrant issued in error but relied on in good faith would not be suppressed

Police were dispatched to a 911 call, and, on the way, discovered an arrest warrant for the subject of the call. By the time they got there, the 911 call was off, but they arrested on the warrant. It turned … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on WI: SI to arrest warrant issued in error but relied on in good faith would not be suppressed

NH: CP search warrant for defendant’s phone and laptop completely lacked PC

Defendant was found asleep in his car in a Walmart parking lot with his pants down after having apparently masturbated to adult porn images on his computer or phone. The discussion with the officers gave no reason to believe defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on NH: CP search warrant for defendant’s phone and laptop completely lacked PC

LA5: Knock-and-talk cannot be used to create exigency

Officers came to defendant’s house because a couple of drug suspects had visited him. The officers’ knock-and-talk didn’t gain them entry into the house, and a knock-and-talk can’t be used to create exigent circumstances. A protective sweep was unjustified because … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Independent source, Knock and talk | Comments Off on LA5: Knock-and-talk cannot be used to create exigency

S.D.N.Y.: Realtime cell phone tracking SW issued with PC

The USPS developed probable cause that defendant was shipping drugs by mail with his own mini mailing service, creating his own mailing labels and having acquired plenty of USPS envelopes and postage to do it. When another suspicious package came … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Mail and packages, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Realtime cell phone tracking SW issued with PC

KS: Guest standing doesn’t require overnight stays to be substantial enough

To have standing to challenge a home search, a guest must show a degree of acceptance into the household or an ongoing and meaningful connection to the host’s residence so that the guest has a reasonable expectation of privacy in … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on KS: Guest standing doesn’t require overnight stays to be substantial enough

D.Ore.: Even if ptf’s 4A violated in stop at Portland airport, exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 case

“First, even assuming that Flinn had no lawful basis to stop and talk to Plaintiff in the first place, Plaintiff’s argument is not viable in a § 1983 claim. In a 2016 Ninth Circuit case, the court noted that the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on D.Ore.: Even if ptf’s 4A violated in stop at Portland airport, exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 case

CA9: PC is a close question, and that’s good enough for GFE

“In this case, it is a close question whether the warrant was supported by probable cause. Although a close call, we need not resolve this issue because even if the warrant lacked probable cause, the good faith exception to the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: PC is a close question, and that’s good enough for GFE

Lawfare: When Does a Carpenter Search Start—and When Does It Stop?

Important, thoughtful piece: Lawfare: When Does a Carpenter Search Start—and When Does It Stop? by Orin Kerr:

Posted in Cell site location information, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Lawfare: When Does a Carpenter Search Start—and When Does It Stop?

NY3: No exigency justified this entry; exclusionary rule applies in NY probation revo proceedings

There was no emergency basis for entry into defendant’s apartment, a probationer. The police understood that another person might be there who they were curious about. Still, there was no justification for the warrantless entry with gun drawn at midnight. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY3: No exigency justified this entry; exclusionary rule applies in NY probation revo proceedings

CA5: Mass suspicionless strip search of a class of 6th grade girls was clearly unreasonable with a failure to train on policy that would have prevented it

“During a sixth-grade choir class, an assistant principal allegedly ordered a mass, suspicionless strip search of the underwear of twenty-two preteen girls. All agree the search violated the girls’ constitutional rights under Texas and federal law. Even so, the district … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA5: Mass suspicionless strip search of a class of 6th grade girls was clearly unreasonable with a failure to train on policy that would have prevented it

D.Md.: Credibility question shown on whether def counsel failed to call material witness at suppression hearing; hearing ordered

Petitioner alleged enough to get a hearing on his 2255 that defense counsel didn’t call a material witness at the suppression hearing that would have created a credibility dispute with the officers as to the nature of the entry. Defense … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Md.: Credibility question shown on whether def counsel failed to call material witness at suppression hearing; hearing ordered

NYT: How Smart TVs in Millions of U.S. Homes Track More Than What’s on Tonight

NYT: How Smart TVs in Millions of U.S. Homes Track More Than What’s on Tonight by Sapna Maheshwari:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYT: How Smart TVs in Millions of U.S. Homes Track More Than What’s on Tonight

E.D.Mich.: By following def and causing him to slow down, the officer created the alleged violation of driving under the minimum speed; stop unreasonable

The DEA asked the Michigan State Police to stop defendant. A trooper followed him and he was driving the speed limit and violating no laws. The officer pulled up next to him to get a look, then slowed to pull … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: By following def and causing him to slow down, the officer created the alleged violation of driving under the minimum speed; stop unreasonable

D.Conn.: Knock-and-announce was complied with, but def also well knew they were there and what for

First, knock and announce was complied with. The officers testified credibly they announced repeatedly as they approached. Second, even if they didn’t, exigency or futility would be an exception–futile because defendant was well aware of their presence. There was also … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Knock-and-announce was complied with, but def also well knew they were there and what for

D.Ariz.: Def on a shuttle bus stopped at I-19 immigration checkpoint consented to search

Defendant was on a shuttle bus referred for secondary inspection at the I-19 immigration checkpoint in Arizona. About 50 come through there a day, and all are stopped and the occupants ordered off. Defendant slipped away and wouldn’t make eye … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Def on a shuttle bus stopped at I-19 immigration checkpoint consented to search

CA10: A KS child welfare pick-up order was valid on its face in CO and didn’t need to be registered to satisfy 4A

A Kansas court issued a pick-up order for ten children from one family for various allegations. At the time the family was found, they were in Colorado, and the order was executed there. There was no statutory or constitutional duty … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: A KS child welfare pick-up order was valid on its face in CO and didn’t need to be registered to satisfy 4A