Daily Archives: July 31, 2018

D.Utah: Officers had no objective information supporting exigency for entry

The officers had no objective information that even suggested that a protective sweep was required here, and the warrantless entry into the home was unreasonable. Moreover, the claimed consent wasn’t voluntary. United States v. Lawley, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125920 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on D.Utah: Officers had no objective information supporting exigency for entry

FL2: Car outside motel room can’t be searched under SW for room; it’s not “curtilage”

Police surveilled three motel rooms for drug activity, and finally they procured a search warrant for the three rooms. They also searched the cars associated with those rooms under the theory the cars were within the curtilage of the motel … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL2: Car outside motel room can’t be searched under SW for room; it’s not “curtilage”

D.N.M.: GFE applies to CA10’s Ackerman that NCMEC is not a private searcher

In United States v. Ackerman, 831 F.3d 1292 (10th Cir. 2016), the Tenth Circuit held that NCMEC was not a mere private actor when it opened emails. Defendant’s search was 2012, and the court applies the good faith exception. At … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.N.M.: GFE applies to CA10’s Ackerman that NCMEC is not a private searcher

N.D.Ga.: Pre-Carpenter CSLI obtained without search warrant is admissible under GFE

Pre-Carpenter CSLI obtained without search warrant is admissible under Davis good faith exception. United States v. Hearst, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126005 (N.D. Ga. July 3, 2018), adopted 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125791 (N.D. Ga. July 27, 2018). The search … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Pre-Carpenter CSLI obtained without search warrant is admissible under GFE

KS: Pleading facts doesn’t plead specific 4A claims; this specific claim is waived for lack of development below

Defendant’s argument in the district court was that the package was subjected to detention without reasonable suspicion, and he did not argue that the package was detained too long. His statement of facts isn’t enough for the court to have … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on KS: Pleading facts doesn’t plead specific 4A claims; this specific claim is waived for lack of development below

NY2: Defense counsel not ineffective for not challenging cell phone search that apparently would lose

“Counsel’s failure to challenge the [cell phone] search warrant can be explained as a legitimate trial strategy because the application for the warrant was supported by probable cause, and the warrant was not unconstitutionally overbroad, despite a technical defect on … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NY2: Defense counsel not ineffective for not challenging cell phone search that apparently would lose