Monthly Archives: June 2018

N.D.Cal.: Def’s parole search on erroneous dispatch report def was on parole means no exclusion under Herring

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and dispatch said he was on parole which meant he was subject to search. He wasn’t on parole, but the officer’s good faith reliance on the dispatch report under Herring means no suppression. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Def’s parole search on erroneous dispatch report def was on parole means no exclusion under Herring

TN: Not IAC to strategically forgo motion to suppress rather than lose plea offer

Defense counsel didn’t provide ineffective assistance of counsel where he didn’t file a motion to suppress because the prosecutor would withdraw the plea offer, and he concluded it wouldn’t be worth the risk. Wilson v. State, 2018 Tenn. Crim. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: Not IAC to strategically forgo motion to suppress rather than lose plea offer

OH3: Def counsel not ineffective for strategy not to challenge car search to distance him from the drugs for trial

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress because he would have to admit he owned or possessed the car for standing, and that was contrary to his defense that it wasn’t his drugs. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OH3: Def counsel not ineffective for strategy not to challenge car search to distance him from the drugs for trial

FL2: Using an antennae to steal wifi that the police traced back didn’t violate a REP

Police obtained information that child pornography was downloaded via an IP address. They searched the computers there, finding none. They investigated further and found defendant was a neighbor who was using a Yagi antennae to obtain radio access to the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on FL2: Using an antennae to steal wifi that the police traced back didn’t violate a REP

CA2: A material witness seized and never presented to a judge stated a claim; and no QI

Plaintiff was held without a hearing as an alleged material witness, but never presented to a court. The district court granted qualified immunity, and the court of appeals reversed. Her rights were clearly established that she was entitled to be … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: A material witness seized and never presented to a judge stated a claim; and no QI

SCOTUS rejects warrantless cellphone location tracking in Carpenter v. United States

SCOTUS rejects warrantless cellphone location tracking in Carpenter v. United States, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3844 (U.S. June 22, 2018) (5-4). Gorsuch “dissents,” but it reads like a concurrence, which parallels his questions at oral argument, and he agrees with Justice … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on SCOTUS rejects warrantless cellphone location tracking in Carpenter v. United States

OR: Guest standing is functional to the relationship to the residence and here didn’t cover under the back steps

Guest standing has a functional element. Defendant was a guest in the home of another and their relationship was founded on drugs. While defendant would have standing in the home, he didn’t under the back steps, where, incidentally, he’d been … Continue reading

Posted in Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Guest standing is functional to the relationship to the residence and here didn’t cover under the back steps

CA3: No REP from police being in a hotel hallway and then having RS for a frisk

The odor of marijuana coming from defendant’s hotel room was reasonable suspicion for his later stop and frisk in the hallway. “Appellant’s brief could also be read to assert that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to patrol the motel hallway. … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA3: No REP from police being in a hotel hallway and then having RS for a frisk

DC (en banc): Way off topic but important: Possibility of deportation makes a “petty” offense “serious” and requires a jury trial

Bado v. United States, 2018 D.C. App. LEXIS 258 (June 21, 2018) (en banc):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on DC (en banc): Way off topic but important: Possibility of deportation makes a “petty” offense “serious” and requires a jury trial

D.D.C.: Manafort DC search valid: The person on the lease of a storage unit and with the keys had [apparent] authority to consent

The search of Paul Manafort’s storage unit was with the consent of the person on the lease and did not violate the Fourth Amendment. It was reasonable for the FBI to believe that the person with the keys had the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Manafort DC search valid: The person on the lease of a storage unit and with the keys had [apparent] authority to consent

CA7: In the private search doctrine and QI, it’s not clearly established that the actors knowing each other isn’t enough

“But for purposes of official immunity, the question is whether existing law clearly establishes that a private search is treated as a governmental search when the public and private actors are friends and potential future coworkers.” It does not. There … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: In the private search doctrine and QI, it’s not clearly established that the actors knowing each other isn’t enough

CA2: There was no heightened expectation of privacy under Collins v. Virginia in a multi-family parking lot

Collins doesn’t provide a heightened expectation of privacy in a multi-family parking lot. “Jones does not dispute that the Dodge Magnum was inherently mobile. … We hold that the officers had probable cause to search the Dodge Magnum and that … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA2: There was no heightened expectation of privacy under Collins v. Virginia in a multi-family parking lot

MS: Issuing a SW for a person with a similar name a decade earlier didn’t make magistrate not neutral and detached

The fact the issuing judge issued another for a relative a decade earlier didn’t show the judge was not a neutral and detached magistrate. There was probable cause for this search warrant. Donaldson v. State, 2018 Miss. App. LEXIS 303 … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause | Comments Off on MS: Issuing a SW for a person with a similar name a decade earlier didn’t make magistrate not neutral and detached

ABAJ: FBI overestimated the number of encrypted phones while arguing for workarounds

ABAJ: FBI overestimated the number of encrypted phones while arguing for workarounds by Jason Tashea:

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ABAJ: FBI overestimated the number of encrypted phones while arguing for workarounds

D.Mont.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing

“Rankin claimed counsel should have sought to suppress some of the evidence used at sentencing, but the exclusionary rule does not apply at sentencing.” United States v. Rankin, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100129 (D. Mont. June 15, 2018). The affidavit … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to sentencing

CA11: The officer received easily verifiable information that the tattoo on the suspect didn’t match the tattoos of the perpetrator; the arrest was without PC

Before the arrest the officer received easily verifiable exculpatory information from a witness, that the citizen’s single tattoo did not match the multiple tattoos visible on the perpetrator in the crime scene photograph that the officer showed the witness. Despite … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: The officer received easily verifiable information that the tattoo on the suspect didn’t match the tattoos of the perpetrator; the arrest was without PC

D.Utah: Def told his friend that police failed to seize something they were looking for in the search of his house, and that justified an obstruction enhancement under USSG 3C1.1

“The Presentence Reported noted that, after his arrest, Petitioner called an individual who was living at his home. Petitioner instructed this person to get rid of additional evidence that police had not found during the execution of the search warrant. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Utah: Def told his friend that police failed to seize something they were looking for in the search of his house, and that justified an obstruction enhancement under USSG 3C1.1

WaPo: Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile and Sprint suspend selling of customer location data after prison officials were caught misusing it

WaPo: Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile and Sprint suspend selling of customer location data after prison officials were caught misusing it by Brian Fung: Verizon, AT&T and Sprint will no longer share its customers’ location information with several third-party companies who failed … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on WaPo: Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile and Sprint suspend selling of customer location data after prison officials were caught misusing it

SCOTUSBlog: Opinion analysis: With facts like these … Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach

SCOTUSBlog: Opinion analysis: With facts like these … Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach by Heidi Kitrosser:

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Opinion analysis: With facts like these … Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach

CA3: Mere presence of transgender student in bathroom of gender identity violates no privacy right of ptfs

Plaintiffs objected to transgender students using school bathrooms in accord with their gender identity claiming a right of privacy. The district court denied an injunction and they appealed. The Third Circuit affirmed because there was no infringement on their privacy … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA3: Mere presence of transgender student in bathroom of gender identity violates no privacy right of ptfs