Daily Archives: June 15, 2018

The New American: Do Tech-sniffing K9s Violate the Fourth Amendment?

The New American: Do Tech-sniffing K9s Violate the Fourth Amendment? by Joe Wolverton, II: For several years, police and the FBI have been secretly training dogs to sniff out thumb drives, SD cards, and other small electronic devices. These special … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on The New American: Do Tech-sniffing K9s Violate the Fourth Amendment?

Wired: Senators Demand Answers from Amazon on Echo’s Snooping Habits

Wired: Senators Demand Answers from Amazon on Echo’s Snooping Habits by Issie Lapowsky: In the letter, Republican senator Jeff Flake and Democratic senator Chris Coons, who serve respectively as chairman and ranking member of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Wired: Senators Demand Answers from Amazon on Echo’s Snooping Habits

D.Ariz.: Long-term pole camera surveillance over the fence surrounding defendant’s junkyard violated his REP

Long-term pole camera surveillance over the fence surrounding defendant’s junkyard violated his reasonable expectation of privacy where the average person couldn’t see over the fence merely walking by. The court differentiates the flyover cases because long-term video surveillance is unusual … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Long-term pole camera surveillance over the fence surrounding defendant’s junkyard violated his REP

MN: 4A claim can’t be brought for first time in post-conviction proceeding

Defendant’s post-conviction claim that the search violated the Fourth Amendment was waived for post-conviction purposes because he had to file it in the trial court before his case concluded. Fox v. State, 2018 Minn. LEXIS 308 (June 13, 2018). The … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MN: 4A claim can’t be brought for first time in post-conviction proceeding

TX: Even if suppression motion is made in trial, state bears burden on a warrantless search

Whether a motion to suppress is filed pretrial or during trial, if the search is shown to be warrantless, the burden shifts to the state to prove the legality of the warrantless search. White v. State, 2018 Tex. Crim. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on TX: Even if suppression motion is made in trial, state bears burden on a warrantless search

SFGate: Do Amazon’s Movement-Tracking Wristbands Violate Workers’ Privacy Rights?

SFGate: Do Amazon’s Movement-Tracking Wristbands Violate Workers’ Privacy Rights? by Dariush Adli A look at the legal precedents shows Amazon could get into trouble with its newly patented devices.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on SFGate: Do Amazon’s Movement-Tracking Wristbands Violate Workers’ Privacy Rights?