Daily Archives: June 22, 2018

SCOTUS rejects warrantless cellphone location tracking in Carpenter v. United States

SCOTUS rejects warrantless cellphone location tracking in Carpenter v. United States, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3844 (U.S. June 22, 2018) (5-4). Gorsuch “dissents,” but it reads like a concurrence, which parallels his questions at oral argument, and he agrees with Justice … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on SCOTUS rejects warrantless cellphone location tracking in Carpenter v. United States

OR: Guest standing is functional to the relationship to the residence and here didn’t cover under the back steps

Guest standing has a functional element. Defendant was a guest in the home of another and their relationship was founded on drugs. While defendant would have standing in the home, he didn’t under the back steps, where, incidentally, he’d been … Continue reading

Posted in Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Guest standing is functional to the relationship to the residence and here didn’t cover under the back steps

CA3: No REP from police being in a hotel hallway and then having RS for a frisk

The odor of marijuana coming from defendant’s hotel room was reasonable suspicion for his later stop and frisk in the hallway. “Appellant’s brief could also be read to assert that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to patrol the motel hallway. … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA3: No REP from police being in a hotel hallway and then having RS for a frisk

DC (en banc): Way off topic but important: Possibility of deportation makes a “petty” offense “serious” and requires a jury trial

Bado v. United States, 2018 D.C. App. LEXIS 258 (June 21, 2018) (en banc):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on DC (en banc): Way off topic but important: Possibility of deportation makes a “petty” offense “serious” and requires a jury trial

D.D.C.: Manafort DC search valid: The person on the lease of a storage unit and with the keys had [apparent] authority to consent

The search of Paul Manafort’s storage unit was with the consent of the person on the lease and did not violate the Fourth Amendment. It was reasonable for the FBI to believe that the person with the keys had the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Manafort DC search valid: The person on the lease of a storage unit and with the keys had [apparent] authority to consent

CA7: In the private search doctrine and QI, it’s not clearly established that the actors knowing each other isn’t enough

“But for purposes of official immunity, the question is whether existing law clearly establishes that a private search is treated as a governmental search when the public and private actors are friends and potential future coworkers.” It does not. There … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: In the private search doctrine and QI, it’s not clearly established that the actors knowing each other isn’t enough

CA2: There was no heightened expectation of privacy under Collins v. Virginia in a multi-family parking lot

Collins doesn’t provide a heightened expectation of privacy in a multi-family parking lot. “Jones does not dispute that the Dodge Magnum was inherently mobile. … We hold that the officers had probable cause to search the Dodge Magnum and that … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA2: There was no heightened expectation of privacy under Collins v. Virginia in a multi-family parking lot

MS: Issuing a SW for a person with a similar name a decade earlier didn’t make magistrate not neutral and detached

The fact the issuing judge issued another for a relative a decade earlier didn’t show the judge was not a neutral and detached magistrate. There was probable cause for this search warrant. Donaldson v. State, 2018 Miss. App. LEXIS 303 … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause | Comments Off on MS: Issuing a SW for a person with a similar name a decade earlier didn’t make magistrate not neutral and detached