Monthly Archives: October 2017

D.Nev.: Def had standing in a car he was loaned

Defendant had standing to challenge GPS tracking of a car he was loaned by the owner. The search wasn’t a pretext from inventory: there was probable cause for the automobile exception. “A warrantless search can occur even after the automobile … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def had standing in a car he was loaned

N.D.Iowa: Calling for drug dog whose sniff didn’t extend stop at all was reasonable

Calling for a drug dog during processing the paperwork of a traffic stop that produced a dog sniff before the stop was over was reasonable. United States v. Harry, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174689 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 23, 2017), adopted, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Calling for drug dog whose sniff didn’t extend stop at all was reasonable

S.D.Tex.: Officer’s belief that driver couldn’t stay in the passing lane wasn’t reasonable mistake

The officer’s belief that driving too long in the left lane of a divided highway was a traffic violation wasn’t reasonable because nothing in the statute allows that construction. Therefore, the stop was invalid. United States v. Buruato, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Officer’s belief that driver couldn’t stay in the passing lane wasn’t reasonable mistake

Cal.1: Def’s lie about his identity to avoid probation search estopped his 4A argument; search valid even if officer didn’t know about probation

Officers believed defendant was involved in a robbery and shot himself. At the ER, defendant lied and gave a false name because he was on probation with a search condition. Defendant’s lie about his identity is an estoppel. He was … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.1: Def’s lie about his identity to avoid probation search estopped his 4A argument; search valid even if officer didn’t know about probation

E.D.Wis.: Window tint violation observed at night in a “split second”

Defendant’s window tint was the basis for a stop at night, and the officer got only a “split second” look at the car but couldn’t see inside. That’s at least reasonable suspicion. [Yes, it’s possible.] United States v. Bogan, 2017 … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Window tint violation observed at night in a “split second”

OH4: Knock-and-announce is not a 4A exclusion issue, and no justification shown for state const. to have different result

Failure to knock-and-announce was not a Fourth Amendment violation, and defendant gave no justification for extending the state constitution. State v. Robinson, 2017-Ohio-8274, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 4658 (4th Dist. Sept. 27, 2017). Defendant waived his knock-and-announce claim by not … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, State constitution | Comments Off on OH4: Knock-and-announce is not a 4A exclusion issue, and no justification shown for state const. to have different result

E.D.Mich.: Seeing def in house of another permitted entry to arrest on an arrest warrant

Seeing defendant in the house of another was justification for entry into the home to arrest him on a warrant under Steagald. United States v. Terrell, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175483 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 24, 2017). Defendant was stopped for … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Seeing def in house of another permitted entry to arrest on an arrest warrant

DE: Probation absconder didn’t have standing in another person’s property; alternatively, probation absconding is exigency

Defendant was a probation absconder, and he did not have standing to contest a search of another probationer’s camper. Even if defendant did have standing, the probation officers substantially complied with departmental guidelines. Defendant’s presence as an absconder from probation … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on DE: Probation absconder didn’t have standing in another person’s property; alternatively, probation absconding is exigency

NY: Threshold arrests remain valid in NYS

Defendant’s arrest at his threshold when he answered his door was valid. The court declines to overturn its “longstanding rule.” People v. Garvin, 2017 NY Slip Op 07382, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 3201 (Oct. 24, 2017). There was reasonable suspicion defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY: Threshold arrests remain valid in NYS

MO: SI of bag with def was valid because, although handcuffed, he wasn’t yet in the patrol car

Search incident of a bag associated with defendant was valid here because defendant wasn’t handcuffed and inside a patrol car. Instead, he was handcuffed and outside the patrol car, and, of course, that’s a big difference. State v. Hughes, 2017 … Continue reading

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on MO: SI of bag with def was valid because, although handcuffed, he wasn’t yet in the patrol car

EFF: EFF and ACLU Ask Appeals Court to Find Section 702 Surveillance Unconstitutional

EFF: EFF and ACLU Ask Appeals Court to Find Section 702 Surveillance Unconstitutional by Andrew Crocker: As Congress considers reforming Section 702, the NSA’s warrantless surveillance authority, EFF and ACLU are asking a federal court of appeals in New York … Continue reading

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on EFF: EFF and ACLU Ask Appeals Court to Find Section 702 Surveillance Unconstitutional

MA: Nexus shown between murder and def’s computer having relevant evidence on it

The state showed nexus to defendant’s laptop and the victim’s murder. Defendant had forged documents on a computer before, and it was reasonable to conclude that similar events happened here by defendant’s hand. Defendant was well experienced in using computers … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Nexus | Comments Off on MA: Nexus shown between murder and def’s computer having relevant evidence on it

CA9: Ptf has to plead well established law was violated for § 1983

Plaintiff has the burden of pleading well established law was violated by defendants’ conduct. Here, the law was “murky” on whether the actions of the plaintiff was probable cause. Thus, the officers get qualified immunity. Burgan v. Nixon, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Ptf has to plead well established law was violated for § 1983

OH3: It’s not constitutionally required that the triggering condition of an anticipatory SW be stated

The triggering condition for the anticipatory search warrant was provided for in the warrant, but that’s not constitutionally required. It did not matter that defendant was a guest in the premises. There was a fair probability that the triggering conditions … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant | Comments Off on OH3: It’s not constitutionally required that the triggering condition of an anticipatory SW be stated

Reason: Sens. Rand Paul and Ron Wyden Unveil Long-Awaited, Privacy-Protecting Surveillance Reform Bill

Reason: Sens. Rand Paul and Ron Wyden Unveil Long-Awaited, Privacy-Protecting Surveillance Reform Bill by Scott Shackford The Fourth Amendment matters to some legislators.

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on Reason: Sens. Rand Paul and Ron Wyden Unveil Long-Awaited, Privacy-Protecting Surveillance Reform Bill

NM: Citizen informant’s call about erratic driving was RS for stop when the vehicle was found

Citizen informant’s call to the police about erratic driving was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop when the car was found. State v. Tidey, 2011-NMCA-068, 2017 N.M. App. LEXIS 103 (Oct. 17, 2017). The stop was justified by a lane change … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Citizen informant’s call about erratic driving was RS for stop when the vehicle was found

NACDL: Protecting Your Digital Devices at the Border, A Criminal Defense Lawyer’s Primer

NACDL: Protecting Your Digital Devices at the Border, A Criminal Defense Lawyer’s Primer (October 2017): Courts have long made it clear that agents can search the bags of people entering the country. For the past decade or so, U.S. Customs … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on NACDL: Protecting Your Digital Devices at the Border, A Criminal Defense Lawyer’s Primer

CNET: Microsoft drops suit over Justice Dept.’s secret data requests

CNET: Microsoft drops suit over Justice Dept.’s secret data requests by Steven Musil: The move comes after the Justice Department says it would scale back demands for customer data without their knowledge. WaPo: Justice Department moves to end routine gag … Continue reading

Posted in Gag orders, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CNET: Microsoft drops suit over Justice Dept.’s secret data requests

EFF: FBI Director Wray is Wrong About Section 702 Surveillance

EFF: FBI Director Wray is Wrong About Section 702 Surveillance by David Ruiz: Newly-minted FBI Director Christopher Wray threw out several justifications for the continued, warrantless government search of American communications. He’s wrong on all accounts. 

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on EFF: FBI Director Wray is Wrong About Section 702 Surveillance

Law.com: The Old Particularity in New Digital Raids

Law.com: The Old Particularity in New Digital Raids by Peter A. Crusco In his Cyber Crime column, Peter A. Crusco addresses the particularity requirement as it relates to digital evidence seized by search warrant, reviews some of the recent cases, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Particularity | Comments Off on Law.com: The Old Particularity in New Digital Raids