Monthly Archives: November 2017

Law and Liberty: The Original Meaning and the Carpenter Case: “Their Papers”

Law and Liberty: The Original Meaning and the Carpenter Case: “Their Papers” by Mike Rappaport:

Posted in SCOTUS, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Law and Liberty: The Original Meaning and the Carpenter Case: “Their Papers”

The Atlantic: A Liberal-Conservative Alliance on the Supreme Court Against Digital Surveillance

The Atlantic: A Liberal-Conservative Alliance on the Supreme Court Against Digital Surveillance Jeffrey Rosen: Justices found common ground in asserting the relevance of the Fourth Amendment in the electronic age, even as they cited sharply different rationales.

Posted in Cell site location information, SCOTUS | Comments Off on The Atlantic: A Liberal-Conservative Alliance on the Supreme Court Against Digital Surveillance

The Hill: It’s too easy for the government to invade privacy in name of security

The Hill: It’s too easy for the government to invade privacy in name of security by Jonathan Turley:

Posted in Cell site location information, SCOTUS | Comments Off on The Hill: It’s too easy for the government to invade privacy in name of security

Carpenter argument now online and Kerr’s comments

Transcript here. Orin Kerr’s video comments here. Kerr’s twitter post with link added: Summary of Carpenter argument using the “four models” framework: Carpenter may win based on several Justices relying on the policy model and one Justice relying on the … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Carpenter argument now online and Kerr’s comments

NYTimes: Justices Seem Ready to Boost Protection of Digital Privacy

NYTimes: Justices Seem Ready to Boost Protection of Digital Privacy by Adam Liptak:

Posted in Cell site location information, SCOTUS, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Justices Seem Ready to Boost Protection of Digital Privacy

CA9: While cell phone privacy interest is substantial, state’s interest in parole searches of cell phones is greater

While the general reasonable expectation of privacy in a cell phone is weighty, it still succumbs to the state’s interest in parole searches of a cell phone to insure compliance with parole requirements. The record also supports consent given by … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: While cell phone privacy interest is substantial, state’s interest in parole searches of cell phones is greater

MD follows Strieff on attenuation from preexisting arrest warrant

“[W]here officers observed a group of individuals openly drinking what appeared to be an alcoholic beverage and one of them threw a bottle to the ground, the officers had reasonable suspicion to investigate a potential open container violation and to … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD follows Strieff on attenuation from preexisting arrest warrant

NY1: Suppression of firearm in criminal case wasn’t collateral estoppel in civil case where ptf didn’t offer any evidence

Suppression of a firearm in the criminal court was not collateral estoppel to a civil case for false arrest, particularly where plaintiff offered no evidence at all. Davidson v. City of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 08313, 2017 N.Y. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Immigration checkpoints, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY1: Suppression of firearm in criminal case wasn’t collateral estoppel in civil case where ptf didn’t offer any evidence

PA: Flashing overhead lights on a police car means stop and stay until released; stopping to check GPS isn’t RS

According to the vehicle code and the driver’s license manual, when a police car has its lights on, a driver is to stop until let go. Here, the officer pulled up next to defendant’s car on the side of I-79 … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Seizure | Comments Off on PA: Flashing overhead lights on a police car means stop and stay until released; stopping to check GPS isn’t RS

W.D.N.C.: First def denied ownership of backpack, and after drugs were found he claimed it; “the fact that defendant claimed ownership of the backpack after the search is of no moment.”

First defendant denied ownership of the backpack, and the police searched it. “[T]he fact that defendant claimed ownership of the backpack after the search is of no moment.” That was abandonment. United States v. Ferebee, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193791 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Administrative search | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: First def denied ownership of backpack, and after drugs were found he claimed it; “the fact that defendant claimed ownership of the backpack after the search is of no moment.”

Arkansas Times: Benton County prosecutors drop Amazon Echo murder case

Arkansas Times: Benton County prosecutors drop Amazon Echo murder case by Max Brantley:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Arkansas Times: Benton County prosecutors drop Amazon Echo murder case

SCOTUSBlog: Wednesday round-up [Carpenter]

SCOTUSBlog: Wednesday round-up by Edith Rogers:

Posted in Cell site location information, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Wednesday round-up [Carpenter]