Monthly Archives: June 2017

NYTimes: Mishandle a Fraud Search, and All That Fine Evidence Could Be for Nothing

NYTimes: Mishandle a Fraud Search, and All That Fine Evidence Could Be for Nothing by Peter J. Henning:

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on NYTimes: Mishandle a Fraud Search, and All That Fine Evidence Could Be for Nothing

SCOTUS avoids deciding El Paso cross border shooting case and remands to CA5

The El Paso-Ciudad Juarez cross border shooting case remanded by SCOTUS to the Fifth Circuit for reconsideration in light of a decision from the Court on June 19th on whether Bivens applies. Hernández v. Mesa, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4059 (June … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS avoids deciding El Paso cross border shooting case and remands to CA5

CA9: Intervenors show no standing to challenge admin. SDT to Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

Intervenors showed no Art. III standing to challenge the DEA’s administrative subpoenas to the Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. Art. III standing requires that they show independent standing to sue. Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program v. United States Drug Enforcement … Continue reading

Posted in Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA9: Intervenors show no standing to challenge admin. SDT to Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

Daily Mail (UK): TSA to start going through books and magazines under new security measures – but critics claim procedure could be used to target people with foreign or religious reading material

Daily Mail (UK): TSA to start going through books and magazines under new security measures – but critics claim procedure could be used to target people with foreign or religious reading material by Hannah Parry:

Posted in Airport searches | Comments Off on Daily Mail (UK): TSA to start going through books and magazines under new security measures – but critics claim procedure could be used to target people with foreign or religious reading material

D.N.M.: GPS tracking warrants can be issued by USMJs; Title III doesn’t apply

The GPS tracking warrants were issued by a USMJ, and Title III’s restriction on only USDJs issuing wiretaps doesn’t apply tracking warrants [which are specifically mentioned in Rule 41]. The tracking did not exceed the 45 day limitation in the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, F.R.Crim.P. 41, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on D.N.M.: GPS tracking warrants can be issued by USMJs; Title III doesn’t apply

E.D.Wis.: Def’s stop was without RS, and body cam video showed it

Milwaukee bike patrol officers heard a gun drop on the street and approached the people around the sound. Only another one walked away as shown in the officer’s body cam. The officers approached defendant, but there was no reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Def’s stop was without RS, and body cam video showed it

CA7: State court following Davis GFE for pre-Jones GPS hardly unreasonable application of federal law under § 2254(d)

District Court [inexplicably] granted CoA for appeal of Wisconsin planting a GPS device a year before Jones which the state court of appeals held was saved by Davis good faith exception. State v. Oberst, 2014 WI App 58, 354 Wis. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA7: State court following Davis GFE for pre-Jones GPS hardly unreasonable application of federal law under § 2254(d)

AZ: Hot pursuit justified for minor offenses

Police attempted to stop defendant for a vehicle registration violation, but he didn’t stop and gave probable cause to believe he was fleeing the stop. He drove into his private driveway with a police car right behind him and went … Continue reading

Posted in Hot pursuit | Comments Off on AZ: Hot pursuit justified for minor offenses

RI: No apparent authority to consent shown; police merely assumed consenter lived there, but she didn’t

The person asked for consent didn’t live there, and the officers made no attempt to find out whether she did. They just assumed she did. The state’s alternative argument of exigency is rejected because the officers never testified to any … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on RI: No apparent authority to consent shown; police merely assumed consenter lived there, but she didn’t

M.D.Pa.: Def kept talking about her husband’s drug activities after ticket issued; that was a consensual extension of the stop

An unlit license plate light was enough for a stop. “Because Defendant had already been issued a traffic citation and then proceeded to initiate further conversation with Officer Monte about her husband’s drug-related activities, the court finds that, under the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Standards of review | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Def kept talking about her husband’s drug activities after ticket issued; that was a consensual extension of the stop

D.C.Cir.: Omission of robbery victim’s failure to ID def didn’t cut either way in Franks analysis; PC still existed

Omission of a non-identification of defendant as a robber was not material for Franks. “Even viewing the omitted non-identification as a material omission, probable cause for the search did not rise or fall on the identification of Dorman as the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Omission of robbery victim’s failure to ID def didn’t cut either way in Franks analysis; PC still existed

KS: CI’s tip insufficient; motion to suppress should have been granted

The alleged reasonable suspicion for extending defendant’s traffic stop was the CI’s information which is found insufficient. The state’s alternative basis of defendant’s alleged “jumpiness” was never presented to the trial court. There are no findings on that, it is … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: CI’s tip insufficient; motion to suppress should have been granted

LA2: Reasonable possibility respondent was father was enough to order DNA test in face of 4A objection

Respondent was the subject of a petition to establish paternity, and he claimed that the statute to order DNA testing required the Fourth Amendment be complied with. “Here, Rogers argues that in order to prove a reasonable possibility of paternity, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, DNA, Probable cause | Comments Off on LA2: Reasonable possibility respondent was father was enough to order DNA test in face of 4A objection

IA: Unnecessary to seek out somebody else not at scene to retrieve car when driver and only passenger arrested

The state showed the impoundment policy was standardized and complied with. It wasn’t necessary at the time to seek out somebody else to retrieve the car from the roadside when both the driver and passenger were arrested. State v. Tronca, … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on IA: Unnecessary to seek out somebody else not at scene to retrieve car when driver and only passenger arrested

MT: Admission at a game checkpoint wasn’t “in custody”

Defendant was stopped at a game checkpoint and admitted to placing his daughter’s tag on a deer he shot. He was not “in custody” when he confessed. State v. Maile, 2017 MT 154, 2017 Mont. LEXIS 350 (June 23, 2017). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Roadblocks | Comments Off on MT: Admission at a game checkpoint wasn’t “in custody”

S.D.Ill.: Officer’s intentional delay in ticketing process made stop violate Rodriguez

Officer’s intentionally delaying the ticket writing process until the drug dog was on its way was intentional delay without reasonable suspicion under Rodriguez. United States v. Rodriguez-Escalera, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95848 (S.D. Ill. June 21, 2017):

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Officer’s intentional delay in ticketing process made stop violate Rodriguez

IA: Consent valid based on testimony despite bodycam not picking up voices

The bodycam didn’t pick up the officer’s voice, which is “troubling,” but the trial court credited the officers’ testimony defendant consented, and that’s enough to have to affirm on consent. State v. Klinger, 2017 Iowa App. LEXIS 633 (June 21, … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Burden of proof | Comments Off on IA: Consent valid based on testimony despite bodycam not picking up voices

D.P.R.: Officer found not believable on facts allegedly leading to RS

The court finds the officer not credible that the defendant picked up a gun and put in his pocket and there was thus no reasonable suspicion for his detention. United States v. Cruz-Montañez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96079 (D. P.R. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Officer found not believable on facts allegedly leading to RS

D.Md.: Off-duty police officer’s in-person tip of possible DWI was RS

Off-duty police officer’s in person tip of possible drunk driver was reasonable suspicion for stop. United States v. Hernández-Ayala, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95387 (D. Md. June 21, 2017). “[T]his Court also finds under the totality of the circumstances that … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Md.: Off-duty police officer’s in-person tip of possible DWI was RS

The Marshall Project: How to Cut Down on Searches in Traffic Stops: Legalize Pot

The Marshall Project: How to Cut Down on Searches in Traffic Stops: Legalize Pot by Justin George and Eric Sarara with additional reporting by Anna Flagg: The legalization of marijuana in Washington state and Colorado had at least one unanticipated … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on The Marshall Project: How to Cut Down on Searches in Traffic Stops: Legalize Pot