Monthly Archives: January 2017

W.D.Mo.: RS still required for a Long protective weapons search of a car

There was no reasonable suspicion for a protective weapons search. Without reasonable suspicion, all cars are subject to search without cause, thereby nullifying the Fourth Amendment. Defendant was stopped in his driveway, and there was also an effort to call … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: RS still required for a Long protective weapons search of a car

OH6: Because OH limits minor misdemeanor searches more than the 4A, search of def because of marijuana flakes on shirt was unreasonable

Defendant was a passenger in a vehicle stopped for suspicion the driver had a suspended DL because of a computer check. Defendant was made to get out of the vehicle despite being blind. The officer noted marijuana flakes on his … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, State constitution, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH6: Because OH limits minor misdemeanor searches more than the 4A, search of def because of marijuana flakes on shirt was unreasonable

Reason: ‘Hit and Run’ Blog: Inside Mississippi’s Asset Forfeiture Extortion Racket

Reason: ‘Hit and Run’ Blog: Inside Mississippi’s Asset Forfeiture Extortion Racket by C.J. Ciaramella: State narcotics police seized $4 million in cash—as well as couches, comics, and 18-wheelers—through asset forfeiture in 2015.

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: ‘Hit and Run’ Blog: Inside Mississippi’s Asset Forfeiture Extortion Racket

SCOTUS: Warning before use of deadly force not “clearly established” [or established at all]

It does not violate clearly established law under the Fourth Amendment to shoot without warning when the shooting is otherwise justified. White v. Pauly, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 5 (Jan. 9, 2017) (per curiam):

Posted in Excessive force, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Warning before use of deadly force not “clearly established” [or established at all]

OR: Trash collector could segregate def’s trash for police

Defendant’s trash was segregated by the private contractor working for the city on defendants’ collection days. That is virtually indistinguishable from State v. Howard, 204 Ore. App. 438, 129 P.3d 792 (2006), aff’d, 342 Ore. 635, 157 P.3d 1189 (2007), … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Trash collector could segregate def’s trash for police

D.Me.: Third party consenter’s apparent authority included the attic

“Contrary to Defendant’s argument, Ms. Barry had common authority over the property. She lived in the home with Defendant and their minor child, and shared a bedroom with Defendant. Consistent with the fact she resided in the home and had … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Me.: Third party consenter’s apparent authority included the attic

W.D.N.Y.: USMJ accidentally crossing out a paragraph when a single sentence about no-knock was intended to be struck didn’t undermine PC; judge deciding the case made the mistake

The USMJ who issued the search warrant decides its validity. An entire paragraph was crossed out, but the court says that it only intended to cross out the no-knock authorization. Since the warrant was signed and the officers were directed … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: USMJ accidentally crossing out a paragraph when a single sentence about no-knock was intended to be struck didn’t undermine PC; judge deciding the case made the mistake

D.Utah: Tossing bag of drugs onto somebody else’s porch is an abandonment; where the police were standing doesn’t matter

Defendant’s tossing a black bag with drugs onto the porch of another apparently attempting to distance himself from them was an abandonment, and he had no standing as to what was thrown onto the porch. It matters not where the … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on D.Utah: Tossing bag of drugs onto somebody else’s porch is an abandonment; where the police were standing doesn’t matter

IN: Tossing flash bang into room with only a 9 month old baby in a playpen during drug raid was excessive under the circumstances; suppressed

Using a flash bang device during a SWAT drug raid that went off in a room with only a nine-month old baby in a playpen violated the state constitution for its overall unreasonableness. Watkins v. State, 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IN: Tossing flash bang into room with only a 9 month old baby in a playpen during drug raid was excessive under the circumstances; suppressed

IL: Def stopped when he saw police lights but encounter was consensual and initiated by community caretaking function

Defendant pulled over because a police car fast approached him from behind, and the officer pulled in behind and turned on his take down light, they both stopped, and the officer walked up to the car with a flashlight in … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent | Comments Off on IL: Def stopped when he saw police lights but encounter was consensual and initiated by community caretaking function

W.D.Ky.: Frisk was without RS, but computer check showed outstanding arrest warrant, so inevitable discovery applies

“In sum, at the time Browning decided to conduct a Terry pat-down of James’ outer clothing, he was faced with a suspect that (1) was present in a high-crime area, (2) was, by his own admission, recently released from prison … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Frisk was without RS, but computer check showed outstanding arrest warrant, so inevitable discovery applies

NE: Recognizing driver as having suspended DL is RS for stop without computer check

An officer recognizing the driver of a car as somebody with a suspended license is reasonable suspicion for a stop without even checking the computer. State v. Arizola, 295 Neb. 477, 2017 Neb. LEXIS 1 (Jan. 6, 2017). Plaintiff’s claim … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: Recognizing driver as having suspended DL is RS for stop without computer check

D.Minn.: IP address and alleged crime was sufficient nexus to def’s electronic devices

Somehow linking defendant’s address to an IP address in an investigation of use of the internet is nexus if there is otherwise probable cause to search electronic devices at defendant’s address. (How it was obtained isn’t all that important. The … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: IP address and alleged crime was sufficient nexus to def’s electronic devices

M.D.Fla.: Franks challenge requires proffer by affidavit, not merely representations by counsel

Franks challenge requires an offer of proof by affidavit. Representations of counsel aren’t enough. United States v. Houston, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 558 (M.D.Fla. Jan. 4, 2017). After dealing with all the allegations:

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Franks challenge requires proffer by affidavit, not merely representations by counsel

D.Idaho: Def’s flight from an unreasonable stop, after initial detention, wasn’t attenuated

Defendant’s flight and dropping gun from an illegal arrest here wasn’t an intervening circumstance. There was nothing in the 911 call that justified defendant’s stop in the first place. Defendant complied at first, and then fled. United States v. Gallinger, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Def’s flight from an unreasonable stop, after initial detention, wasn’t attenuated

WaPo: Radley Balko’s ‘The Watch’ Blog: This week in drug raids

WaPo: Radley Balko’s ‘The Watch’ Blog: This week in drug raids: The latest in busted doors, dead dogs and dead bodies. … Meanwhile, the Drug War Chronicle reports that 49 people were killed in police drug war operations in 2016, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: Radley Balko’s ‘The Watch’ Blog: This week in drug raids

W.D.Ky.: Apparent hand-to-hand transaction in high crime area is RS; officers don’t have to actually see the drugs

Officers don’t have to actually see drugs pass in an apparent hand-to-hand transaction in a high crime area to have reasonable suspicion. Reasonable suspicion isn’t a certainty. United States v. Slaughter, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 569 (W.D.Ky. Jan. 4, 2017):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Apparent hand-to-hand transaction in high crime area is RS; officers don’t have to actually see the drugs

The Legal Intelligencer: Will Technology Change the Interpretation of the Fourth Amendment? Part 2

The Legal Intelligencer: Will Technology Change the Interpretation of the Fourth Amendment? Part 2 by Leonard Deutchman:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Legal Intelligencer: Will Technology Change the Interpretation of the Fourth Amendment? Part 2

Tribune-Review: Equal enforcement for all: Set StingRay standard (Editorial)

Tribune-Review: Equal enforcement for all: Set StingRay standard (Editorial): A new, bipartisan House Oversight and Government Reform Committee report rightly calls for a national standard governing all federal, state and local law enforcers’ use of devices that mimic cellphone towers … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on Tribune-Review: Equal enforcement for all: Set StingRay standard (Editorial)

AntiWar.com: There’s Little Reason To be Optimistic About Trump and Privacy

AntiWar.com: There’s Little Reason To be Optimistic About Trump and Privacy by Lucy Steigerwald:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on AntiWar.com: There’s Little Reason To be Optimistic About Trump and Privacy