Monthly Archives: January 2017

Cal.4th: Public strip search of ptf stated claim: He was in a park arrested for being there after it closed, on a bike without a headlight, and fled when officers approached

Plaintiff had a claim under the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act, even if officers had probable cause for an arrest, because he alleged roadside body cavity searches which necessarily amounted to intentional conduct separate and independent from a lawful arrest … Continue reading

Posted in Strip search | Comments Off on Cal.4th: Public strip search of ptf stated claim: He was in a park arrested for being there after it closed, on a bike without a headlight, and fled when officers approached

CA6: Without record references to where the facts are, the court finds the 4A argument waived; counsel blames word limits on briefs

Defendant had waived his challenge to the denial of motions to suppress where he failed to point to any findings in the record demonstrating how the district court erred or why a wiretap application lacked probable cause. Even if defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Without record references to where the facts are, the court finds the 4A argument waived; counsel blames word limits on briefs

WY: Jury instruction on the state version of the 4A wasn’t proper in case involving use of force against officer in his house

One is not entitled to use excessive force against a police officer unlawfully in the home. The officer must also be using excessive force. Defendant’s proffered jury instruction that merely recited the state constitutional provision on search and seizure was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on WY: Jury instruction on the state version of the 4A wasn’t proper in case involving use of force against officer in his house

CA5: Ptf loses on his civil Franks claim because of a lack of materiality to PC

The affidavit for arrest warrant failed to include information that would undermine the credibility of the police informant, but the court finds that the omission was not material and there was other information that supported probable cause. Therefore, the officer … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf loses on his civil Franks claim because of a lack of materiality to PC

LA1: DNA testing for paternity testing is governed by the 4A

Court ordered DNA testing for paternity is a search under the Fourth Amendment, but it is reasonable. L.J.D. v. M.V.S, 2017 La. App. LEXIS 107 n.8 (La.App. 1 Cir. Jan. 25, 2017). The police knew three weeks ahead of time … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on LA1: DNA testing for paternity testing is governed by the 4A

S.D.W.Va.: Pen register information collected beyond time limit of register not suppressed under 4A because it’s not a search

Pen register information collected outside the time period of the pen register order would not be suppressed under the Fourth Amendment because its collection is not even a “search.” Defendant has no standing in search warrants issued for two cell … Continue reading

Posted in Search | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Pen register information collected beyond time limit of register not suppressed under 4A because it’s not a search

N.D.Cal.: Documents seized beyond SW terms in computer search suppressed

The government seized documents in a computer search that are outside the warrant because it didn’t comply with a Comprehensive Drug Testing computer search protocol, but it declines to remove them from its computer image file because it would taint … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Documents seized beyond SW terms in computer search suppressed

E.D.Cal.: No right to return of iPad and iPhone as long as they have evidentiary value, including through appeal

Defendant does not have a right to return of seized property under Rule 41(g) as long as there is potential evidentiary value, including through appeal. Defendant does not claim that his iPad and iPhone weren’t illegally seized to begin with; … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: No right to return of iPad and iPhone as long as they have evidentiary value, including through appeal

E.D.Mich.: Squeezing bag of MJ when taking it off def wasn’t unreasonable; it was apparent what it was

Squeezing a baggie of suspected marijuana to sense its feel was not unreasonable, if that is part of defendant’s argument, which isn’t obvious. It was at arms length when seized, and its appearance was marijuana anyway. United States v. Barnes, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Squeezing bag of MJ when taking it off def wasn’t unreasonable; it was apparent what it was

N.D.Ga.: Police reports attached to post-hearing brief not in evidence would not be considered

“[T]he Court does not consider the exhibits that Smith attached to his post-evidentiary hearing brief. These documents presumably were in Defendant’s possession at the time of the evidentiary hearings and could have been used to cross-examine the witnesses. Smith does … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Police reports attached to post-hearing brief not in evidence would not be considered

M.D.Pa.: Girlfriend’s misstatement about presence of other persons in house during probation search justified protective sweep

“[O]fficers went to Mr. Owens’ residence to conduct a probationary check. After knocking on the door, officers were told by Mr. Owens’ girlfriend, Ms. Haqq, that he was not present and that she was the only adult at the residence. … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Girlfriend’s misstatement about presence of other persons in house during probation search justified protective sweep

The Hill: Congress must restore 4th Amendment protections for email privacy

The Hill: Congress must restore 4th Amendment protections for email privacy by Brian McNicoll: Additionally, unfettered access to private emails does not seem to comport with the Fourth Amendment protections against search and seizure without a duly sworn warrant. Congress … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on The Hill: Congress must restore 4th Amendment protections for email privacy

Police One: What cops need to know about TASER use, the Fourth Amendment and excessive use of force

Police One: What cops need to know about TASER use, the Fourth Amendment and excessive use of force by Mike Callahan By analyzing case law, we can glean constitutional guidance concerning when the use of a TASER is lawfully appropriate … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Police One: What cops need to know about TASER use, the Fourth Amendment and excessive use of force

EFF Asks Massachusetts High Court to Require Clear Limits Before Allowing Searches of Digital Devices and Information

EFF Asks Massachusetts High Court to Require Clear Limits Before Allowing Searches of Digital Devices and Information by Stephanie Lacambra: Along with several other advocacy groups, EFF signed on to an amicus brief this week in the case of the … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on EFF Asks Massachusetts High Court to Require Clear Limits Before Allowing Searches of Digital Devices and Information

W.D.La.: Deciding against def after remand on suppression motion on different ground didn’t violate mandate

On remand from reversal of denial of defendant’s suppression motion, the court analyzed the evidence anew, albeit from a different perspective, and it denies the motion to suppress on different grounds. This does not violate the Fifth Circuit’s mandate. Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Deciding against def after remand on suppression motion on different ground didn’t violate mandate

Reason: Majority of States Lack Transparency on Asset Forfeiture

Reason: Majority of States Lack Transparency on Asset Forfeiture by C.J. Ciaramella: Want to know how much stuff police are seizing from people and where all that money goes? Good luck. Asset forfeiture programs in the majority of states across … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: Majority of States Lack Transparency on Asset Forfeiture

E.D.Mich.: Mixed motive for otherwise valid inventory doesn’t make it unreasonable

A mixed motive for an inventory search doesn’t make it unreasonable as long as the inventory was reasonable. United States v. Dowl, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7184 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 19, 2017):

Posted in Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Mixed motive for otherwise valid inventory doesn’t make it unreasonable

OH3: CI invited in could record def in home

It does not violate the Fourth Amendment for a CI invited into defendant’s house for a drug deal to surreptitiously video record it. State v. Valdez, 2017-Ohio-241, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 242 (3d Dist. Jan. 23, 2017). Defendant claims he … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH3: CI invited in could record def in home

UT: Def counsel failed to provide effective assistance in getting 4A issue before court for resolution

Defense counsel failed to adequately defend the accused on his motion to suppress by not briefing and failing to get it before the court for a hearing, essentially abandoning the client. The issue was left cloudy enough in the record … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on UT: Def counsel failed to provide effective assistance in getting 4A issue before court for resolution

MA: Anonymous tip only corroborated on obvious details not sufficient

The state failed to corroborate at all the basis of knowledge or reliability of the anonymous source. The described car showing up at the appointed time isn’t enough. Commonwealth v. Pinto, 2017 Mass. LEXIS 21 (Jan. 23, 2017):

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MA: Anonymous tip only corroborated on obvious details not sufficient