Monthly Archives: August 2016

NC: SW for medical records was reasonable and not barred by HIPAA

Defendant’s motion to suppress wasn’t timely, and the trial court didn’t err for denying it on that ground alone. Even so, on the merits, obtaining defendant’s medical records for DUI by search warrant wasn’t unreasonable: HIPAA permits search and seizure … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on NC: SW for medical records was reasonable and not barred by HIPAA

NC: Search of def’s person not justified just because of smell of MJ in car

The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence found during a search of his person as the deputy lacked probable cause to remove defendant from the vehicle and search his person. The State offered no evidence that … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on NC: Search of def’s person not justified just because of smell of MJ in car

Orin Kerr on WaPo: New draft article: ‘The Effect of Legislation on Fourth Amendment Interpretation’

Orin Kerr on WaPo: New draft article: ‘The Effect of Legislation on Fourth Amendment Interpretation’:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Orin Kerr on WaPo: New draft article: ‘The Effect of Legislation on Fourth Amendment Interpretation’

2016 supplement off to the publisher for December 2016 publication

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on 2016 supplement off to the publisher for December 2016 publication

NYLJ: Police Use of Force, the Constitution, and the New NYPD Policy

NYLJ: Police Use of Force, the Constitution, and the New NYPD Policy by Christopher Dunn: Earlier this summer, the NYPD—the nation’s largest and most influential police department—rolled out new use-of-force policies that have received precious little scrutiny. In light of … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on NYLJ: Police Use of Force, the Constitution, and the New NYPD Policy

SF Chronicle: Op-ed: First they take your stuff, then you get to ask for it back

SF Chronicle: Op-ed: First they take your stuff, then you get to ask for it back by Debra J. Saunders:

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on SF Chronicle: Op-ed: First they take your stuff, then you get to ask for it back

New law review article: The Original Fourth Amendment by Laura Donohue

New law review article: The Original Fourth Amendment by Laura Donohue, University of Chicago Law Review, Forthcoming. Abstract: The meaning of the rights enshrined in the Constitution provide a critical baseline for understanding the limits of government action — perhaps … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on New law review article: The Original Fourth Amendment by Laura Donohue

ID: Accident investigation alone not exigency for warrantless blood draw

The fact of a motor vehicle accident investigation is alone not exigency for dispensing with a warrant for a blood draw. Instead, other officers could have been called in to help with the investigation or get the blood warrant. State … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on ID: Accident investigation alone not exigency for warrantless blood draw

MN: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to state tax proceedings

In this state tax case, the taxpayer claimed revenuers came to his liquor store and searched and seized by downloading his Quickbooks file to a flash drive. The state tax court holds that, even if the search was unreasonable, the … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on MN: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to state tax proceedings

IN: CSLI is intrusive and protected by 4A; not a mere third party record

CSLI is not just ordinary third party records, and they have Fourth Amendment protection without a warrant. CSLI is collected surreptitiously while bank (Miller) and telephone tolls calls (Smith) are provided willingly and knowingly. Moreover, CSLI is far more intrusive … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on IN: CSLI is intrusive and protected by 4A; not a mere third party record

CA10: NCMEC is govt agent not a subject to private search doctrine; email a “paper” or “effect” for 4A

NCMEC is a government actor because of how the government treats and funds it, and the private search doctrine does not apply to it. AOL here captured emails with child pornography and forwarded them to NCMEC which further searched them, … Continue reading

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on CA10: NCMEC is govt agent not a subject to private search doctrine; email a “paper” or “effect” for 4A

The Texas Tribune: What Are Your Rights at U.S.-Mexico Border Patrol Checkpoints?

The Texas Tribune: What Are Your Rights at U.S.-Mexico Border Patrol Checkpoints? by Julián Aguilar: Under federal law, checkpoints are legal. But officers do have limits in what they can ask you.

Posted in Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on The Texas Tribune: What Are Your Rights at U.S.-Mexico Border Patrol Checkpoints?

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Utah SWAT stats show militarized tactics used less, but still overwhelmingly for drug crimes

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Utah SWAT stats show militarized tactics used less, but still overwhelmingly for drug crimes by Radley Balko: That’s a massive increase in the use of tactics that are inherently volatile, risky and violent. It’s unfortunate that … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Utah SWAT stats show militarized tactics used less, but still overwhelmingly for drug crimes

techdirt: Sheriff Uses Unconstitutional Law To Raid Home And Seize Electronics Belonging To Watchdog Blogger

techdirt: Sheriff Uses Unconstitutional Law To Raid Home And Seize Electronics Belonging To Watchdog Blogger by Tim Cushing: A Louisiana sheriff has just inserted himself into a mess of First and Fourth Amendment violations by using his power to go … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on techdirt: Sheriff Uses Unconstitutional Law To Raid Home And Seize Electronics Belonging To Watchdog Blogger

WI: Consent to a blood draw or suffer DL revo was still voluntary consent

Defendant consented to a blood draw knowing that his license would have been revoked if he didn’t. “Blackman, by choosing to give actual consent, made a voluntary choice. The choice was Blackman’s alone and, as such, was not coerced.” State … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Standing | Comments Off on WI: Consent to a blood draw or suffer DL revo was still voluntary consent

CA8: Losing a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to a § 1983 case over the same search

Losing a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to a § 1983 case over the same search. Nance v. Humane Society to Pulaski County, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14239 (8th Cir. Aug. 4, 2016):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA8: Losing a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to a § 1983 case over the same search

CA8: Apparent hidden compartment under trunk raised RS to PC

Defendant consented to a search of his car during a stop because of something dragging under the car. He was asked because he was nervous. In the trunk, the officer noticed the carpet was glued down, and that indicated to … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Apparent hidden compartment under trunk raised RS to PC

ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional?

ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional? by Debra Cassens Weiss No. The fact police think it’s not speaks to their psychology.

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional?

N.D.Cal.: Conversations outside courthouse were entitled to REP

Surreptitious recordings outside the San Mateo courthouse of persons talking amongst themselves were entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy because they talked such that others could not overhear them except with planted recording devices. United States v. Giraudo, 2016 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Conversations outside courthouse were entitled to REP

NJ: Joint occupancy by adults with separate bedrooms doesn’t give apparent authority over each other’s rooms

Because of the heightened privacy protection in the home, it was unreasonable for the officer here to conclude that one adult resident of a home could consent to a search of the room of another adult resident. “Third parties derive … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on NJ: Joint occupancy by adults with separate bedrooms doesn’t give apparent authority over each other’s rooms