Daily Archives: August 14, 2016

ME: Great detail supported the CI’s statement; inclusion of CI’s criminal history didn’t undermine PC

The great detail about the CI with its corroboration was probable cause. The inclusion of the CI’s criminal history doesn’t ipso facto undermine the probable cause, and the reviewing court is obliged to give deference to the issuing court’s probable … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on ME: Great detail supported the CI’s statement; inclusion of CI’s criminal history didn’t undermine PC

OR: Going into pocket after patdown unreasonable; no articulation of anything being a weapon

Defendant consented to a patdown, and the officer exceeded the scope of the patdown by going into the pocket. He felt something, but he didn’t articulate that it could be a weapon. The officer’s general observations about drug dealers didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OR: Going into pocket after patdown unreasonable; no articulation of anything being a weapon

S.D.N.Y.: Child porn SW affidavit doesn’t need pictures attached: a description will do

The description “child pornography” is enough for the affidavit for a CP search warrant–the pictures themselves don’t have to be attached to prove it. United States v. Weatherman, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104878 (S.D. N.Y. Aug. 9, 2016). Based on … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Child porn SW affidavit doesn’t need pictures attached: a description will do

N.D.Ill.: Defense counsel was ineffective for not seeing def’s guest standing in girlfriend’s apartment

Defendant established a failure of performance of defense counsel in his 2255 for not filing a motion to suppress on guest standing. He didn’t file a motion to suppress solely because defendant said he didn’t “live at” his girlfriend’s place, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Defense counsel was ineffective for not seeing def’s guest standing in girlfriend’s apartment

OR: Def didn’t abandon backpack by not affirmatively claiming ownership of it during vehicle search by consent

The officer had reasonable suspicion something was up and the driver of a van already stopped consented to a search of the van, but that did not include a backpack that didn’t belong to him. Defendant did not abandon the … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Overbreadth | Comments Off on OR: Def didn’t abandon backpack by not affirmatively claiming ownership of it during vehicle search by consent

S.D.N.Y.: Lack of full detail and minor discrepancies from reports didn’t make officers unbelievable

In a Bronx stop and frisk, the fact that the four NYPD Stop, Question and Frisk Report Worksheets for each person frisked didn’t have the detail of the officers’ hearing testimony or resulted in minor discrepancies doesn’t make them unbelievable. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Lack of full detail and minor discrepancies from reports didn’t make officers unbelievable