Daily Archives: August 19, 2016

CA7: No REP in IP address because it is broadcast

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the IP address one is using because it’s broadcast far and wide. It is a mere business record under the third party doctrine, and Jones doesn’t alter the third party doctrine. United … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: No REP in IP address because it is broadcast

CA3: Strip searching an inmate in isolation 3 times a day serves no penological purpose and is enjoined

Strip searching an inmate in isolation three times a day serves no penological purpose and is enjoined. Parkell v. Danberg, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15092 (3d Cir. Aug. 17, 2016):

Posted in Strip search | Comments Off on CA3: Strip searching an inmate in isolation 3 times a day serves no penological purpose and is enjoined

E.D.Mich.: Gov’t failed to prove nexus to def’s property in SW affidavit, so no PC

The government fails to prove nexus to defendant’s property in a drug search warrant for three addresses. The lack of nexus is a lack of probable cause [and the court doesn’t even discuss good faith exception]. United States v. Harvey, … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Gov’t failed to prove nexus to def’s property in SW affidavit, so no PC

AJC: Gwinnett police add drone to their investigative arsenal

AJC: Gwinnett police add drone to their investigative arsenal: The Gwinnett County Police Department has added a drone to its investigative arsenal…. GCPD believes it’s the first law enforcement agency in the state to seek drone approval from the Federal … Continue reading

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on AJC: Gwinnett police add drone to their investigative arsenal

N.D.Ala.: Strieff applied to a possibly negligent look through a garage window when OnStar reported location of stolen car

A Cadillac was stolen from a car dealer, and it was tracked by OnStar in the car. Police came to do a knock-and-talk. Two cars were in the carport that weren’t the stolen car. They looked through a window of … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Strieff applied to a possibly negligent look through a garage window when OnStar reported location of stolen car

MA automatic standing only applies to possessory offenses, and it doesn’t apply to defendant’s murder charge

Massachusetts automatic standing only applies to possessory offenses, and it doesn’t apply to defendant’s murder charge. Commonwealth v. Miller, 475 Mass. 212, 2016 Mass. LEXIS 605 (Aug. 17, 2016). The government showed probable cause for the defendant but the connection … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Standing | Comments Off on MA automatic standing only applies to possessory offenses, and it doesn’t apply to defendant’s murder charge