Daily Archives: August 28, 2016

MD: Consent to search of car doesn’t include a frisk of the person

Defendant consented to a search of his car, but that did not permit a frisk of his person. On the totality here, the officer did not have reasonable suspicion for a frisk of defendant’s person. Objectively, he had a hunch … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MD: Consent to search of car doesn’t include a frisk of the person

CADC: Executing daytime warrant at night was unreasonable and a violation of the 4A

Executing a daytime warrant at night violated clearly established law and was unreasonable and a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Jones v. Kirchner, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15759 (D.C.Cir. Aug. 26, 2016). This warrant provided: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CADC: Executing daytime warrant at night was unreasonable and a violation of the 4A

AR: While SW must be issued on affidavit or recorded testimony, questions about no-knock didn’t have to be recorded, especially when no-knock refused

Search warrants must be issued on affidavits or recorded testimony. The issuing judge asked questions about the no-knock entry, and this was separate from probable cause finding. This did not have to be recorded. Besides, the judge denied the no-knock … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on AR: While SW must be issued on affidavit or recorded testimony, questions about no-knock didn’t have to be recorded, especially when no-knock refused

The Hill: Feds brace for new drone rules to take flight

The Hill: Feds brace for new drone rules to take flight by Melanie Zanona: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is preparing for a swarm of drone applications when the first ever rule permitting small, routine drone flights goes into effect … Continue reading

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on The Hill: Feds brace for new drone rules to take flight

CA2: Even if defendant’s stop violated the Fourth Amendment, his assault on the officer not suppressed

Even if defendant’s stop violated the Fourth Amendment, his assault on the officer would not be suppressed. United States v. Jenkins, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15539 (2d Cir. Aug. 24, 2016). Defendant’s 2255 claim seems to be that the government … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source | Comments Off on CA2: Even if defendant’s stop violated the Fourth Amendment, his assault on the officer not suppressed

CA2: Murder scene entry resulted in valid protective sweep and plain view

NYPD’s crime scene entry at the scene of a murder and protective sweep were all valid because of the exigency of the entry. Drug and other evidence was in plain view. [There are no facts talking about standing, or whether … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Murder scene entry resulted in valid protective sweep and plain view

VI: The court declines to adopt horizontal collective knowledge

The court declines to adopt horizontal collective knowledge since the V.I. Supreme Court has never addressed it. [It’s rationale, however, is likely at odds with Utah v. Strieff which likely was never briefed.] People v. Looby, 2016 V.I. LEXIS 114 … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge | Comments Off on VI: The court declines to adopt horizontal collective knowledge