Daily Archives: August 4, 2016

N.D.Cal.: Conversations outside courthouse were entitled to REP

Surreptitious recordings outside the San Mateo courthouse of persons talking amongst themselves were entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy because they talked such that others could not overhear them except with planted recording devices. United States v. Giraudo, 2016 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Conversations outside courthouse were entitled to REP

NJ: Joint occupancy by adults with separate bedrooms doesn’t give apparent authority over each other’s rooms

Because of the heightened privacy protection in the home, it was unreasonable for the officer here to conclude that one adult resident of a home could consent to a search of the room of another adult resident. “Third parties derive … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on NJ: Joint occupancy by adults with separate bedrooms doesn’t give apparent authority over each other’s rooms

CA9: Dist.Ct. erred in finding apparent authority over a briefcase that the consenter had no interest in when owner was objecting

The district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants on a third party consent issue. There was no reason to believe that the person they sought consent from had an equal or superior control over the briefcase at issue, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on CA9: Dist.Ct. erred in finding apparent authority over a briefcase that the consenter had no interest in when owner was objecting

M.D.Fla.: The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential”

The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential.” United States v. Collins, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101003 (M.D.Fla. May 31, 2016), adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential”