Daily Archives: August 5, 2016

The Texas Tribune: What Are Your Rights at U.S.-Mexico Border Patrol Checkpoints?

The Texas Tribune: What Are Your Rights at U.S.-Mexico Border Patrol Checkpoints? by Julián Aguilar: Under federal law, checkpoints are legal. But officers do have limits in what they can ask you.

Posted in Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on The Texas Tribune: What Are Your Rights at U.S.-Mexico Border Patrol Checkpoints?

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Utah SWAT stats show militarized tactics used less, but still overwhelmingly for drug crimes

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Utah SWAT stats show militarized tactics used less, but still overwhelmingly for drug crimes by Radley Balko: That’s a massive increase in the use of tactics that are inherently volatile, risky and violent. It’s unfortunate that … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Utah SWAT stats show militarized tactics used less, but still overwhelmingly for drug crimes

techdirt: Sheriff Uses Unconstitutional Law To Raid Home And Seize Electronics Belonging To Watchdog Blogger

techdirt: Sheriff Uses Unconstitutional Law To Raid Home And Seize Electronics Belonging To Watchdog Blogger by Tim Cushing: A Louisiana sheriff has just inserted himself into a mess of First and Fourth Amendment violations by using his power to go … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on techdirt: Sheriff Uses Unconstitutional Law To Raid Home And Seize Electronics Belonging To Watchdog Blogger

WI: Consent to a blood draw or suffer DL revo was still voluntary consent

Defendant consented to a blood draw knowing that his license would have been revoked if he didn’t. “Blackman, by choosing to give actual consent, made a voluntary choice. The choice was Blackman’s alone and, as such, was not coerced.” State … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Standing | Comments Off on WI: Consent to a blood draw or suffer DL revo was still voluntary consent

CA8: Losing a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to a § 1983 case over the same search

Losing a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to a § 1983 case over the same search. Nance v. Humane Society to Pulaski County, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14239 (8th Cir. Aug. 4, 2016):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA8: Losing a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to a § 1983 case over the same search

CA8: Apparent hidden compartment under trunk raised RS to PC

Defendant consented to a search of his car during a stop because of something dragging under the car. He was asked because he was nervous. In the trunk, the officer noticed the carpet was glued down, and that indicated to … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Apparent hidden compartment under trunk raised RS to PC

ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional?

ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional? by Debra Cassens Weiss No. The fact police think it’s not speaks to their psychology.

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional?