Monthly Archives: August 2014

TX4: Reverses self on remand from McNeely: warrant was required

On remand from SCOTUS after McNeely, the Texas Court of Appeals in San Antonio reverses itself and held that a warrant was required for defendant’s blood draw. Aviles v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 8508 (Tex. App. – San Antonio … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX4: Reverses self on remand from McNeely: warrant was required

NYTimes: Editorial: Keeping Track: … Stop-and-Frisk

NYTimes: Editorial: Keeping Track: … Stop-and-Frisk:

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NYTimes: Editorial: Keeping Track: … Stop-and-Frisk

CA5: Firing assault rifle into car with suicidal driver during high speed chase not constitutionally unreasonable

An officer firing an assault rifle into a fleeing stolen car operated at high speeds by a suicidal armed man did not commit a constitutional violation. There was no constitutional obligation on the part of the officer to use less … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: Firing assault rifle into car with suicidal driver during high speed chase not constitutionally unreasonable

M.D.Fla.: A private party’s search of a thumb drive didn’t limit the government’s search when they provided it

A thumb drive was found with child pornography on it by a private party who turned it over to the government. The government wasn’t limited by the scope of the private party’s search as to how deep it could search. … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: A private party’s search of a thumb drive didn’t limit the government’s search when they provided it

CA7: Warrantless seizure of alleged contraband wasn’t covered yet by FTCA; GJ in session

The DEA’s warrantless seizure of the plaintiff’s fake incense products which the DEA considered contraband but wasn’t declared such until just after the seizure didn’t state a claim for separate relief yet for a seizure for forfeiture. The government apparently … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA7: Warrantless seizure of alleged contraband wasn’t covered yet by FTCA; GJ in session

FL3: SI of defendant’s cell phone in 2011 already violated established law in Florida

The search incident of defendant’s cell phone was in violation of settled law in Florida at the time it happened in 2011, and the search is suppressed. Saint-Hilaire v. State, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12039 (Fla. 3d DCA August 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL3: SI of defendant’s cell phone in 2011 already violated established law in Florida

WA: Defendant was separated from his backpack, so it couldn’t be searched incident to arrest

During a Terry stop, the officer separated defendant from his backpack, and the backpack was searched about 10 minutes later when defendant was placed under arrest. The backpack was thus not on defendant’s person nor within his area of control … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on WA: Defendant was separated from his backpack, so it couldn’t be searched incident to arrest

N.D.Cal.: Police observation of a controlled buy is justification for a traffic stop

Police observation of a controlled buy is justification for a traffic stop. United States v. Cooper, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105617 (N.D. Cal. July 31, 2014).* D.C. helped set up defendant’s computer system, and defendant was downloading child pornography. The … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Police observation of a controlled buy is justification for a traffic stop

WaPo: Police officers have no constitutional ‘right of privacy’ in records of their official misconduct

WaPo: Police officers have no constitutional ‘right of privacy’ in records of their official misconduct by Eugene Volokh.

Posted in Police misconduct, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Police officers have no constitutional ‘right of privacy’ in records of their official misconduct

Law.com/CT: Gideon: Conn. Court Makes Misguided Ruling in Name of Officer Safety

Law.com/CT: Gideon: Conn. Court Makes Misguided Ruling in Name of Officer Safety In 1979, the U.S. Supreme Court in Ybarra v. Illinois held that ‘a person’s mere propinquity to others independently suspected of criminal activity does not, without more, give … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Law.com/CT: Gideon: Conn. Court Makes Misguided Ruling in Name of Officer Safety

D.Neb.: Cell phone GPS location was obtained by court order under § 2703 so GFE applies

Cell phone GPS location data was obtained by HSI with a court order on probable cause. While it wasn’t under Rule 41, it was clearly covered by good faith under § 2703. United States v. Garcia, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Cell phone GPS location was obtained by court order under § 2703 so GFE applies

WI: When a probation term includes no computers, it is reasonable for a probation officer to search one found in the home

When a probation term includes no computers, it is reasonable for a probation officer to search one found in the home. This one had child pornography on it. State v. Purtell, 2014 WI 101, 2014 Wisc. LEXIS 538 (August 1, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WI: When a probation term includes no computers, it is reasonable for a probation officer to search one found in the home

CA7: Davis GFE exception applies to pre-Jardines dog sniffs

A pre-Jardines dog sniff at the door is saved by the Davis good faith exception. United States v. Gutierrez, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14853 (7th Cir. July 29, 2014). The Eighth Circuit said the same thing the same day. Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA7: Davis GFE exception applies to pre-Jardines dog sniffs

D.Minn.: Defendant’s denial he had an ID didn’t warrant searching his wallet

Just because defendant was nervous and denied having ID when it was apparent he had a wallet, a search of his wallet wasn’t justified. United States v. Garcia-Garza, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105586 (D. Minn. June 30, 2014):

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Defendant’s denial he had an ID didn’t warrant searching his wallet

D.Neb.: Good faith exception applies to applications for CSLI

The good faith exception applies to applications for CSLI. United States v. Corona, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106398 (D. Neb. June 23, 2014): Notwithstanding the sufficiency of the search warrant issued by Judge Gossett, or any theoretical ramifications behind distinguishing … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Good faith exception applies to applications for CSLI

WaPo: How closely is Google really reading your e-mail?

WaPo: How closely is Google really reading your e-mail? by Hayley Tsukayama: Most users know that Google routinely uses software to scan the contents of e-mails, including images, to feed its advertising and to identify malware. But many may not … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on WaPo: How closely is Google really reading your e-mail?

D.Colo.: Photo of property in SW application cures address typo

A typo in the address, 1557 v. 1577, was not material where the application for the search warrant had a photograph of the property involved. United States v. Padilla, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104023 (D. Colo. July 30, 2014). Exigent … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Photo of property in SW application cures address typo

TN: Tracking no. typo not prejudicial in SW

Presented as an IAC claim, defendant’s claim that the tracking number on the package on the anticipatory warrant had a typo was not sufficient to void the search. It was not a prejudicial error. Davidson v. State, 2014 Tenn. Crim. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TN: Tracking no. typo not prejudicial in SW

The Hill: Microsoft digs in on digital privacy

The Hill: Microsoft digs in on digital privacy by Julian Hattem: Microsoft and the DOJ are squaring off in a case with drastic ramifications for digital privacy.

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on The Hill: Microsoft digs in on digital privacy

ND: State can’t justify exigent circumstances; suppressed

The state could not justify exigent circumstances in this case. Even the officer’s own testimony admittedly didn’t support it. State v. Stewart, 2014 ND 165, 2014 N.D. LEXIS 167 (July 31, 2014).* While consent of search of rooms of a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on ND: State can’t justify exigent circumstances; suppressed