Daily Archives: August 22, 2014

W.D.Mich.: Police wandering rural property for an hour was invalid knock and talk

Officers came to defendant’s rural property to do a knock and talk and “lingered” for an hour wandering around. They obviously made a decision to search before they got there, and their actions were that of searching officers and the … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: Police wandering rural property for an hour was invalid knock and talk

CA7: Def’s car with his phone in it parked repeatedly outside a house supported PC to search that place

The repeated presence of defendant’s car and cell phone at the place searched under the warrant added to the probable cause that that was a place where evidence could be found. It wasn’t misleading to the USMJ to not tell … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA7: Def’s car with his phone in it parked repeatedly outside a house supported PC to search that place

KS: “puppy dog look” isn’t enough for a stop

Defendant’s “puppy dog look” isn’t enough for a stop. State v. Wilburn, 2014 Kan. App. LEXIS 56 (August 15, 2014): At the time of the stop, the officers had no reasonable and articulable suspicion that Wilburn or Curtis had committed … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: “puppy dog look” isn’t enough for a stop

CA5: Consent to search trunk doesn’t include passengers bags, too; no apparent authority

While the government didn’t argue standing in the USDC, it was decided, so it can appeal on that question. Passengers in a vehicle have standing to challenge the search of their own luggage. Here, the driver’s consent to search the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on CA5: Consent to search trunk doesn’t include passengers bags, too; no apparent authority