Daily Archives: August 24, 2014

TX1: Fire scene search of unprotected property months after fire not unlawful

Months after a fire, arson investigators entered defendant’s property again to try to determine the source of the fire. It was not a criminal investigation yet. Significant here was that defendant hadn’t done anything to secure the premises, contrary to … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX1: Fire scene search of unprotected property months after fire not unlawful

TX4 follows Fifth Circuit and TX14: Search warrant not required for CSLI

TX4 follows Fifth Circuit and TX14: Search warrant not required for CSLI. It is information kept by the phone provider and voluntarily disclosed to it by the use of the cell phone. Ford v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 9159 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, GPS / Tracking Data, Informational privacy | Comments Off on TX4 follows Fifth Circuit and TX14: Search warrant not required for CSLI

WaPo: Editorial: The country needs more information on how often police kill

Editorial: The country needs more information on how often police kill: HOW MANY times a year do U.S. police officers employ deadly force, and how many people die as a result? What are the races and ethnicities of those involved? … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on WaPo: Editorial: The country needs more information on how often police kill

NYTimes: In Washington, Second Thoughts on Arming Police

NYTimes: In Washington, Second Thoughts on Arming Police by Matt Apuzzo and Michael S. Schmidt: WASHINGTON — Jolted by images of protesters clashing with heavily armed police officers in Missouri, President Obama has ordered a comprehensive review of the government’s … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on NYTimes: In Washington, Second Thoughts on Arming Police

CA2: Whether to employ a SWAT team entitled to qualified immunity; rest of raid not

The decision to employ a SWAT team is subject to qualified immunity, but the actions that follow here aren’t. The raid here was overkill [my word], and the officers do not get qualified immunity for how it was conducted because … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Overbreadth, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Whether to employ a SWAT team entitled to qualified immunity; rest of raid not