Category Archives: Arrest or entry on arrest

CA11: Abduction from the Dominican Republic to Florida for trial did not deny jurisdiction to try offense

Abduction from the Dominican Republic to Florida for trial did not violate extradition treaty because extradition is only one way to get a person back to the U.S. United States v. Odoni, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 502 (11th Cir. January … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA11: Abduction from the Dominican Republic to Florida for trial did not deny jurisdiction to try offense

CA6: Search of suspended judge’s personal safe during judicial misconduct investigation stated a claim for relief

The plaintiff was a judge suspended by the state judiciary and a workplace search occurred in relation to that investigation. Her personal safe was searched, too. The search of the office was reasonable under O’Connor, but the search of her … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA6: Search of suspended judge’s personal safe during judicial misconduct investigation stated a claim for relief

The Atlantic: The Future of Getting Arrested: What they’re gonna do when they come for you

The Atlantic: The Future of Getting Arrested: What they’re gonna do when they come for you by Leon Neyfakh: Even the most straightforward arrest is built upon an incredibly complex foundation: the moment the handcuffs go on is the moment … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on The Atlantic: The Future of Getting Arrested: What they’re gonna do when they come for you

IL: Handcuffs may be applied during a Terry encounter without turning it into an arrest

Handcuffs may be applied during a Terry encounter without turning it into an arrest. Here, there was plenty of reasonable suspicion and an uncooperative defendant. People v. Fields, 2014 IL App (1st) 130209, 2014 Ill. App. LEXIS 950 (December 31, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Handcuffs may be applied during a Terry encounter without turning it into an arrest

D.Conn.: CSLI not good enough to place def at particular location for entry to arrest

Using cell site location data to locate the defendant, the fact the phone put him at a particular address wasn’t sufficient to show that he was actually inside or that it was his residence under Steagald. The government had no … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones | Comments Off on D.Conn.: CSLI not good enough to place def at particular location for entry to arrest

N.D.Cal.: When the gov’t claims “high crime” area justifying pursuit when one flees, it has to prove the area was

Flight in an area the officers claim is “high crime” doesn’t make the area “high crime”–the prosecution has to prove it. Some areas of California, and most of some cities cannot be labeled “high crime” at all. Wardlow requires flight … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: When the gov’t claims “high crime” area justifying pursuit when one flees, it has to prove the area was

CA4: “Reason to believe” the defendant is home for execution of an arrest warrant under Payton is less than PC

“Reason to believe” the defendant is home for execution of an arrest warrant under Payton v. New York is less than probable cause. Fialdini v. Cote, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22938 (4th Cir. December 5, 2014):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA4: “Reason to believe” the defendant is home for execution of an arrest warrant under Payton is less than PC

MA: Arrest on recalled warrant suppressed under state const. where officers violated policy and didn’t recheck

Product of an arrest on a recently recalled warrant suppressed under the state constitution. The police had plenty of time to check the status of the warrant during the hours of surveillance looking for defendant and waiting for him to … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, State constitution | Comments Off on MA: Arrest on recalled warrant suppressed under state const. where officers violated policy and didn’t recheck

Cal.1: Taking DNA from an arrestee violates the California Constitution; Maryland v. King distinguished

California’s Constitution and DNA statute is different than Maryland’s in Maryland v. King so taking DNA from an arrestee is unconstitutional. People v. Buza, 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 1100 (1st Dist. December 3, 2014):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Informational privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on Cal.1: Taking DNA from an arrestee violates the California Constitution; Maryland v. King distinguished

MO: Entry to talk to defendant about stolen car was without exigency and suppressed

Officers got word that a man was trying to sell a stolen car, and they gave defendant’s address. One drove by defendant’s house five times before finding the car there, so he called for back up, doing a knock-and-talk over … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk | Comments Off on MO: Entry to talk to defendant about stolen car was without exigency and suppressed

W.D.N.Y.: Abandonment during an illegal arrest is subject to suppression

In this dropsy case, the court first finds that defendant’s arrest was without probable cause. A bag of pills was found at his feet. No officer saw him drop it, but that’s the inference the government wants to draw. Abandonment … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Abandonment during an illegal arrest is subject to suppression

NM: BAC blood draw by SW doesn’t require arrest already have occurred

A BAC blood draw by search warrant does not require the defendant be under arrest first. “[A] constitutionally permissible search of a person’s blood may arise either from an arrest pursuant to the Implied Consent Act or a valid search … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Due process | Comments Off on NM: BAC blood draw by SW doesn’t require arrest already have occurred

TN: No relief under plain error for McLaughlin error of no PC determination in 48 hours because of muddled facts

In a case that started in 1997 and was the subject of a successful habeas petition, defendant is not entitled to relief for a McLaughlin error where he was held more than 48 hours without a probable cause determination and … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: No relief under plain error for McLaughlin error of no PC determination in 48 hours because of muddled facts

WA: Probation search of iPod without RS was unconstitutional

A probation search of an iPod without a warrant was improper under state law. The statute doesn’t help the court, but the department’s rules do, and they limit searches to a potential offense being investigated and this was not. Thus, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Independent source, Probable cause | Comments Off on WA: Probation search of iPod without RS was unconstitutional

SC: Def had no standing to contest police entry onto the porch where he was hanging out, allegedly dealing drugs

Officers watched the porch of Apartment 122 and observed five men 10:00-10:30 pm, and five cars came up and one would go to the cars and do what appeared to be a hand-to-hand transaction. Finally, the officers moved to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Consent, Standing | Comments Off on SC: Def had no standing to contest police entry onto the porch where he was hanging out, allegedly dealing drugs

E.D.Mo.: By calling police to a home invasion robbery, defendant consented to entries

Defendant called the police because he was the victim of a home invasion robbery. That investigation also turned into an investigation of defendant for drug possession. Officers returned the next day to talk about the home invasion, but they also … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: By calling police to a home invasion robbery, defendant consented to entries

CA8: Implied consent given when arrested defendant asked to go in and change clothes

Defendant was arrested in pajamas outside her house. She asked to be able to change into other clothes before leaving, and the officers agreed. It was understood, without asking, that they would have to accompany her to the bedroom while … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on CA8: Implied consent given when arrested defendant asked to go in and change clothes

S.D.N.Y.: Riley issue preserved and came down after verdict, but harmless on this record

The motion to suppress a cell phone search under the automobile exception was filed and heard in November before Riley, and defendant was convicted. Before sentencing, Riley came down, and the court asked for briefs. The court concludes the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Riley issue preserved and came down after verdict, but harmless on this record

CA7: Davis GFE saves pre-Jardines-type search

Defendant was remanded for resentencing, and he sought to reopen his suppression hearing in light of Jardines. Agreeing that a “change in the law” can justify departure from the mandate of reversal, defendant loses on the Jardines argument because it … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Dog sniff, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA7: Davis GFE saves pre-Jardines-type search

CA4: Officers didn’t force their way in, but the exceptions to knock-and-announce applied

The officer hit defendant’s door hard to announce his presence under the knock-and-announce requirement and the door swung open on its own. That was technically a “breaking” under § 3109, but it was reasonable to enter without announcement because of … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Consent, Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Officers didn’t force their way in, but the exceptions to knock-and-announce applied